Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We get it, troll. Because you don't know things, nobody does. Of course, that makes everything you say utterly retarded. How can anyone know someone is wrong, if we can't know things? Moron...Look kid they dont agree with each other and everything not verifiable is a fucking theorySo, no idea then. You're sure they're wrong, but can't say why or what is right.
Let us know when the truth sinks in
Quote the ones who disagree and name them. You still haven't told us what you think the truth really is, only complained about something you don't understand.
Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Look kid they dont agree with each other and everything not verifiable is a fucking theorySo, no idea then. You're sure they're wrong, but can't say why or what is right.
Let us know when the truth sinks in
Quote the ones who disagree and name them. You still haven't told us what you think the truth really is, only complained about something you don't understand.
Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Look kid they dont agree with each other and everything not verifiable is a fucking theory
Let us know when the truth sinks in
Quote the ones who disagree and name them. You still haven't told us what you think the truth really is, only complained about something you don't understand.
Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.
Frannie: nobody can know where humans came from or any fundamental truths abiut the universeWell, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Quote the ones who disagree and name them. You still haven't told us what you think the truth really is, only complained about something you don't understand.
Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.
The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future, remembering that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator.
Frannie: nobody can know where humans came from or any fundamental truths abiut the universeWell, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.
The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future, remembering that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator.
Also Frannie: god exists and created humans
Moron
They were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?Tell us, where did humans come from?
I tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pondThey were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?Tell us, where did humans come from?
Again simpleton Hawking claims you are wrongI tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
1) NOTHING escapes a black hole.
2) "plasma" made up of electrons and positrons do shoot out from the REGION (but not from the surface) of a black hole.
If you actually want to LEARN something rather than trolling l, here's an excellent article:
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
You just can't think outside of your little childish creation box...life creating itself
See, you know less than nothing about Hawking radiation as well. Even with Hawking radiation, nothing escapes from within the event horizon. In fact, Hawking radiation itself relies on that principle. Not that you have any idea what any of that means.Again simpleton Hawking claims you are wrongI tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
1) NOTHING escapes a black hole.
2) "plasma" made up of electrons and positrons do shoot out from the REGION (but not from the surface) of a black hole.
If you actually want to LEARN something rather than trolling l, here's an excellent article:
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
You are really dumb, most internet geniuses are.
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements
Sure I can, DNA is really just a hard drive containing the molecular code of life, but the code that we see is actually the hard drive and the code is yet to be visualized.You just can't think outside of your little childish creation box...life creating itself
See, you know less than nothing about Hawking radiation as well. Even with Hawking radiation, nothing escapes from within the event horizon. In fact, Hawking radiation itself relies on that principle. Not that you have any idea what any of that means.Again simpleton Hawking claims you are wrongI tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
1) NOTHING escapes a black hole.
2) "plasma" made up of electrons and positrons do shoot out from the REGION (but not from the surface) of a black hole.
If you actually want to LEARN something rather than trolling l, here's an excellent article:
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
You are really dumb, most internet geniuses are.
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements
Wrong, as you are every time you say it.See, you know less than nothing about Hawking radiation as well. Even with Hawking radiation, nothing escapes from within the event horizon. In fact, Hawking radiation itself relies on that principle. Not that you have any idea what any of that means.Again simpleton Hawking claims you are wrongI tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
1) NOTHING escapes a black hole.
2) "plasma" made up of electrons and positrons do shoot out from the REGION (but not from the surface) of a black hole.
If you actually want to LEARN something rather than trolling l, here's an excellent article:
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
You are really dumb, most internet geniuses are.
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements
You have no idea that there are no settled facts in the entire field of theoretical physics
NOT ONE THATS WHY IT IS THEORY
Wrong, as you are every time you say it.See, you know less than nothing about Hawking radiation as well. Even with Hawking radiation, nothing escapes from within the event horizon. In fact, Hawking radiation itself relies on that principle. Not that you have any idea what any of that means.Again simpleton Hawking claims you are wrongI tried to explain this to you in another thread. You didnt listen.'UFOs' are coming out of black holes and altering galaxies forever: 'It's all very new science'
I wish these fucking physics professors would make up their minds already
Yawn
1) NOTHING escapes a black hole.
2) "plasma" made up of electrons and positrons do shoot out from the REGION (but not from the surface) of a black hole.
If you actually want to LEARN something rather than trolling l, here's an excellent article:
How Do Particles Escape Black Holes? Supercomputers May Have the AnswerThe gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape once it gets too close. However, there is one way to escape a black hole — but only if you're a subatomic particle.
As black holes gobble up the matter in their surroundings, they also spit out powerful jets of hot plasma containing electrons and positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Just before those lucky incoming particles reach the event horizon, or the point of no return, they begin to accelerate. Moving at close to the speed of light, these particles ricochet off the event horizon and get hurled outward along the black hole's axis of rotation.
You are really dumb, most internet geniuses are.
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements
You have no idea that there are no settled facts in the entire field of theoretical physics
NOT ONE THATS WHY IT IS THEORY
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Quote the ones who disagree and name them. You still haven't told us what you think the truth really is, only complained about something you don't understand.
Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.
The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pondThey were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?Tell us, where did humans come from?
Why is it that physicist are saying that the observable universe is not real but a computer simulation?Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.Einstein's static universe, also known as the Einstein universe or the Einstein world, is a relativistic model of the universe proposed by Albert Einstein in 1917. Shortly after completing the general theory of relativity, Einstein applied his new theory of gravity to the universe as a whole. Assuming a universe that was static in time, and possessed of a uniform distribution of matter on the largest scales, Einstein was led to a finite, static universe of spherical spatial curvature.
In order to achieve a consistent solution to the Einstein field equations for the case of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, Einstein found it necessary to introduce a new term to the field equations, the cosmological constant. In the resulting model, the radius R and density of matter ρ of the universe were related to the cosmological constant λ according to λ = 1/R2 = κp/2 where κ is the Einstein constant.[3]
Following the discovery by Edwin Hubble of a linear relation between the redshifts of the galaxies and their distance in 1929,[4] Einstein abandoned his static model of the universe and proposed expanding models such as the Friedmann-Einstein universe and the Einstein-de Sitter universe. In both cases, he set the cosmological constant to zero, declaring it "no longer necessary and theoretically unsatisfactory"
To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.
You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.
You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever
The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.
Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.
In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.
I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.
The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.
We are endowed by our creator with intelligence, and we can use that intelligence to observe and understand our environment. Thus, to say the observable universe cannot ever be understood at all is fallacious. The blunders of the past merely show us what not to assume today, and we are constantly learning more.
So basically your argument boils down to this: you are ignorant (no problem on its face because it can be cured, but a problem if you stay that way) and you intend to remain ignorant, and in your ignorance you lash out at those smarter than you who attempt to gain understanding of our universe, claiming they are ignorant fools.
Tell me, did you ever figure out how motor drives for telescopes work? Until you do that, you're not even trying.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pondThey were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?Tell us, where did humans come from?
We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
