Lol now stuff is coming out of black holes

To put it mildly, your quote there does nothing to diminish Einstein's work, it merely reflects his adapting his model to match new observations. He was still a lot smarter than you will ever be.

You're worried about stuff from 1917? Scientists have been testing Einstein's work for decades. Some gets updated, some gets shown to be wrong, but most of his work holds up. Here's a hint for you, research what astronomy and astrophysics is telling us NOW. They're refining, not totally contradicting, a lot of earlier work and using much better equipment that gives us much more precise measurements.

You still haven't told us what YOU think is true. How far away are the galaxies, what is creating the hot jets we're seeing? Come on, you have to do better than just complain about work that smarter people have done.

Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking

Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever

The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.

Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.


In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.

I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.

Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.

The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.

We are endowed by our creator with intelligence, and we can use that intelligence to observe and understand our environment. Thus, to say the observable universe cannot ever be understood at all is fallacious. The blunders of the past merely show us what not to assume today, and we are constantly learning more.

So basically your argument boils down to this: you are ignorant (no problem on its face because it can be cured, but a problem if you stay that way) and you intend to remain ignorant, and in your ignorance you lash out at those smarter than you who attempt to gain understanding of our universe, claiming they are ignorant fools.

Tell me, did you ever figure out how motor drives for telescopes work? Until you do that, you're not even trying.
Why is it that physicist are saying that the observable universe is not real but a computer simulation?

Answer, because gravitational math forbids it from doing what is observed, or the observation is wrong.

They say that because quantum physics maintains that the universe is digital in nature. This is based on observable phenomena, things like quantum states and the Planck constant. We are constantly checking and rechecking all physical laws and theories as new, more precise equipment becomes available. You should know that.
 
Tell us, where did humans come from?
They were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pond

We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?

Lol

We finally have the first image of a black hole and it matches the predictions that came from that theoretical physics. Yes, black holes are moving from mathematical constructs to observed phenomena. And Hawking was always smarter than you. The mere fact that you choose to mock him from a position of ignorance tells me that.
 
Einstein was 100 percent totally WRONG
So was Hawking

Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career -
Stephen Hawking admits the biggest blunder of his scientific career - early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever

The cosmologist Stephen Hawking has described the biggest blunder of his scientific career – his early belief that everything swallowed up by a black hole must be lost forever.

Professor Hawking said that there is one thing that does in fact escape from black holes – radiation. He has previously said that his discovery of what is now known as Hawking radiation was one of his proudest achievements.


In a lecture at a hospital in Los Angeles that has pioneered research into stem-cell treatments for degenerative diseases – including his own condition of motor neuron disease – Professor Hawking described the blunder that had initially blinded him to one of his greatest insights into the Universe.

I can do this all night, why because no one knows anything, you for one only think you know, because the universe is not stranger than you think, it's stranger than you can think. So when you do think as does any human with our Earth perspective, they become a screwball, like the certified physicist and morons babbling that the universe is not real and they can prove it
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.

Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.

The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.

We are endowed by our creator with intelligence, and we can use that intelligence to observe and understand our environment. Thus, to say the observable universe cannot ever be understood at all is fallacious. The blunders of the past merely show us what not to assume today, and we are constantly learning more.

So basically your argument boils down to this: you are ignorant (no problem on its face because it can be cured, but a problem if you stay that way) and you intend to remain ignorant, and in your ignorance you lash out at those smarter than you who attempt to gain understanding of our universe, claiming they are ignorant fools.

Tell me, did you ever figure out how motor drives for telescopes work? Until you do that, you're not even trying.
Why is it that physicist are saying that the observable universe is not real but a computer simulation?

Answer, because gravitational math forbids it from doing what is observed, or the observation is wrong.

They say that because quantum physics maintains that the universe is digital in nature. This is based on observable phenomena, things like quantum states and the Planck constant. We are constantly checking and rechecking all physical laws and theories as new, more precise equipment becomes available. You should know that.
Nope now they are saying there is no dark matter because the speed is coming from outside the universe

Whaaaaaaaaa a new day a new bs

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim
 
Tell us, where did humans come from?
They were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pond

We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?

Lol

We finally have the first image of a black hole and it matches the predictions that came from that theoretical physics. Yes, black holes are moving from mathematical constructs to observed phenomena. And Hawking was always smarter than you. The mere fact that you choose to mock him from a position of ignorance tells me that.
Whaa!aaaa.

Theory of the day

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim
 
Well, duh, every scientist is wrong somewhere in their career. The smart ones figure out they were, admit it and correct their work.

Now, for the untold nth time, what do YOU think is the truth, since you apparently believe your intellect and knowledge on the subject of astrophysics is superior to that of Einstein and Hawking? If you don't answer this time, it will be apparent that you really have no idea.

The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.

We are endowed by our creator with intelligence, and we can use that intelligence to observe and understand our environment. Thus, to say the observable universe cannot ever be understood at all is fallacious. The blunders of the past merely show us what not to assume today, and we are constantly learning more.

So basically your argument boils down to this: you are ignorant (no problem on its face because it can be cured, but a problem if you stay that way) and you intend to remain ignorant, and in your ignorance you lash out at those smarter than you who attempt to gain understanding of our universe, claiming they are ignorant fools.

Tell me, did you ever figure out how motor drives for telescopes work? Until you do that, you're not even trying.
Why is it that physicist are saying that the observable universe is not real but a computer simulation?

Answer, because gravitational math forbids it from doing what is observed, or the observation is wrong.

They say that because quantum physics maintains that the universe is digital in nature. This is based on observable phenomena, things like quantum states and the Planck constant. We are constantly checking and rechecking all physical laws and theories as new, more precise equipment becomes available. You should know that.
Nope now they are saying there is no dark matter because the speed is coming from outside the universe

Whaaaaaaaaa a new day a new bs

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

It's a new theory. If observations support it, it will gain credibility. Have you figured out how motor drives for telescopes work yet?
 
They were all born to their mothers amd fathers. What a stupid question. Did you think storks bring babies?
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pond

We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?

Lol

We finally have the first image of a black hole and it matches the predictions that came from that theoretical physics. Yes, black holes are moving from mathematical constructs to observed phenomena. And Hawking was always smarter than you. The mere fact that you choose to mock him from a position of ignorance tells me that.
Whaa!aaaa.

Theory of the day

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

That's the way science works, scientists get an idea, test it against observable phenomena, publish it and get other scientists to test it out. Of course some will be rejected and proven false. That's how it works. You should know that. Figured out how telescopes work yet?
 
The truth unfortunately is that the human race has no idea where they came from or how they were created or for what purpose, the further truth is that the universe outside of our solar system is a complete enigma that may never be understood. See I have shown you and could go on for days showing you massive scientific blunders of the past, that are not solved in the present as we are living in the past of the future where todays genius is tomorrows fool. Remember that we can not do or understand anything that was not already understood by our creator as we did not form spontaneously in a pond, nor could the simplest life form.

We are endowed by our creator with intelligence, and we can use that intelligence to observe and understand our environment. Thus, to say the observable universe cannot ever be understood at all is fallacious. The blunders of the past merely show us what not to assume today, and we are constantly learning more.

So basically your argument boils down to this: you are ignorant (no problem on its face because it can be cured, but a problem if you stay that way) and you intend to remain ignorant, and in your ignorance you lash out at those smarter than you who attempt to gain understanding of our universe, claiming they are ignorant fools.

Tell me, did you ever figure out how motor drives for telescopes work? Until you do that, you're not even trying.
Why is it that physicist are saying that the observable universe is not real but a computer simulation?

Answer, because gravitational math forbids it from doing what is observed, or the observation is wrong.

They say that because quantum physics maintains that the universe is digital in nature. This is based on observable phenomena, things like quantum states and the Planck constant. We are constantly checking and rechecking all physical laws and theories as new, more precise equipment becomes available. You should know that.
Nope now they are saying there is no dark matter because the speed is coming from outside the universe

Whaaaaaaaaa a new day a new bs

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

It's a new theory. If observations support it, it will gain credibility. Have you figured out how motor drives for telescopes work yet?

Actually the idea that something unknown is attracting the universe is just a play on DARK MATTER IS DOING IT. The problem with dark matter is that there is no way to hide 85 percent of the universe, SO this gave way to the universe is a computer simulation and now THE NEXT THEORY is that something outside the universe has some magical attraction able to pull an entire universe toward it. What you do not understand is that none of this is real, can you comprehend that it all cant be real as these theories contradict each other? Or do you just believe everything you see and read? Because Putin will give you lots of logical believable reading material...………………….

Schmuck, dark matter was just tossed away and just the other day you and others were demanding that I was stupid for not accepting everything at face value.

LOL You wanna buy a bridge

Have fun doing the long range exposure when the object being focused is on the other side of the Earth

Long range exposure
maxresdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
A stork bringing mothers and fathers actually makes more sense then life creating itself in a pond

We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?

Lol

We finally have the first image of a black hole and it matches the predictions that came from that theoretical physics. Yes, black holes are moving from mathematical constructs to observed phenomena. And Hawking was always smarter than you. The mere fact that you choose to mock him from a position of ignorance tells me that.
Whaa!aaaa.

Theory of the day

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

That's the way science works, scientists get an idea, test it against observable phenomena, publish it and get other scientists to test it out. Of course some will be rejected and proven false. That's how it works. You should know that. Figured out how telescopes work yet?
There is no observable phenomena outside this universe.

How old are you really, I know your mental age is perhaps 15
 

I'll take that as a "Yes"
How old are you really? We're not a nation of fear driven, tattletaling haters. "A Nation of Immigrants" was written as "part of the Anti-Defamation League's series entitled the One Nation Library." When even the Jewish people find your attitude seriously warped here perhaps it's high time you checked yourself before totally wrecking yourself.
 

I'll take that as a "Yes"
How old are you really? We're not a nation of fear driven, tattletaling haters. "A Nation of Immigrants" was written as "part of the Anti-Defamation League's series entitled the One Nation Library." When even the Jewish people find your attitude seriously warped here perhaps it's high time you checked yourself before totally wrecking yourself.
Fuck You Bernie
ISIS releases another video of beheading
How did his phobia turn out, you malignant shit
sharia-head-cutting.jpg
 
By the way, the software (ironically) reinterpreted your links when I simply cut and pasted them above. Because we're all being spied upon constantly by big govt and corporations. They don't really need any of our help.
 
By the way, the software (ironically) reinterpreted your links when I simply cut and pasted them above. Because we're all being spied upon constantly by big govt and corporations. They don't really need any of our help.
You mean like if you use the words Plutonium, Sheik or Jihad that NSA software will pick up the communication automatically and an agent will read it to determine the threat level.

You mean like that fuckwad?

Oh these words work too, theoretically anyway

Waihopai, INFOSEC, Information Security, Information Warfare, IW, IS, Priavacy, Information Terrorism, Terrorism Defensive Information, Defense Information Warfare, Offensive Information, Offensive Information Warfare, National Information Infrastructure, InfoSec, Reno, Compsec, Computer Terrorism, Firewalls, Secure Internet Connections, ISS, Passwords, DefCon V, Hackers, Encryption, Espionage, USDOJ, NSA, CIA, S/Key, SSL, FBI, Secert Service, USSS, Defcon, Military, White House, Undercover, NCCS, Mayfly, PGP, PEM, RSA, Perl-RSA, MSNBC, bet, AOL, AOL TOS, CIS, CBOT, AIMSX, STARLAN, 3B2, BITNET, COSMOS, DATTA, E911, FCIC, HTCIA, IACIS, UT/RUS, JANET, JICC, ReMOB, LEETAC, UTU, VNET, BRLO, BZ, CANSLO, CBNRC, CIDA, JAVA, Active X, Compsec 97, LLC, DERA, Mavricks, Meta-hackers, ^?, Steve Case, Tools, Telex, Military Intelligence, Scully, Flame, Infowar, Bubba, Freeh, Archives, Sundevil, jack, Investigation, ISACA, NCSA, spook words, Verisign, Secure, ASIO, Lebed, ICE, NRO, Lexis-Nexis, NSCT, SCIF, FLiR, Lacrosse, Flashbangs, HRT, DIA, USCOI, CID, BOP, FINCEN, FLETC, NIJ, ACC, AFSPC, BMDO, NAVWAN, NRL, RL, NAVWCWPNS, NSWC, USAFA, AHPCRC, ARPA, LABLINK, USACIL, USCG, NRC, ~, CDC, DOE, FMS, HPCC, NTIS, SEL, USCODE, CISE, SIRC, CIM, ISN, DJC, SGC, UNCPCJ, CFC, DREO, CDA, DRA, SHAPE, SACLANT, BECCA, DCJFTF, HALO, HAHO, FKS, 868, GCHQ, DITSA, SORT, AMEMB, NSG, HIC, EDI, SAS, SBS, UDT, GOE, DOE, GEO, Masuda, Forte, AT, GIGN, Exon Shell, CQB, CONUS, CTU, RCMP, GRU, SASR, GSG-9, 22nd SAS, GEOS, EADA, BBE, STEP, Echelon, Dictionary, MD2, MD4, MDA, MYK, 747,777, 767, MI5, 737, MI6, 757, Kh-11, Shayet-13, SADMS, Spetznaz, Recce, 707, CIO, NOCS, Halcon, Duress, RAID, Psyops, grom, D-11, SERT, VIP, ARC, S.E.T. Team, MP5k, DREC, DEVGRP, DF, DSD, FDM, GRU, LRTS, SIGDEV, NACSI, PSAC, PTT, RFI, SIGDASYS, TDM. SUKLO, SUSLO, TELINT, TEXTA. ELF, LF, MF, VHF, UHF, SHF, SASP, WANK, Colonel, domestic disruption, smuggle, 15kg, nitrate, Pretoria, M-14, enigma, Bletchley Park, Clandestine, nkvd, argus, afsatcom, CQB, NVD, Counter Terrorism Security, Rapid Reaction, Corporate Security, Police, sniper, PPS, ASIS, ASLET, TSCM, Security Consulting, High Security, Security Evaluation, Electronic Surveillance, MI-17, Counterterrorism, spies, eavesdropping, debugging, interception, COCOT, rhost, rhosts, SETA, Amherst, Broadside, Capricorn, Gamma, Gorizont, Guppy, Ionosphere, Mole, Keyhole, Kilderkin, Artichoke, Badger, Cornflower, Daisy, Egret, Iris, Hollyhock, Jasmine, Juile, Vinnell, B.D.M.,Sphinx, Stephanie, Reflection, Spoke, Talent, Trump, FX, FXR, IMF, POCSAG, Covert Video, Intiso, r00t, lock picking, Beyond Hope, csystems, passwd, 2600 Magazine, Competitor, EO, Chan, Alouette,executive, Event Security, Mace, Cap-Stun, stakeout, ninja, ASIS, ISA, EOD, Oscor, Merlin, NTT, SL-1, Rolm, TIE, Tie-fighter, PBX, SLI, NTT, MSCJ, MIT, 69, RIT, Time, MSEE, Cable & Wireless, CSE, Embassy, ETA, Porno, Fax, finks, Fax encryption, white noise, pink noise, CRA, M.P.R.I., top secret, Mossberg, 50BMG, Macintosh Security, Macintosh Internet Security, Macintosh Firewalls, Unix Security, VIP Protection, SIG, sweep, Medco, TRD, TDR, sweeping, TELINT, Audiotel, Harvard, 1080H, SWS, Asset, Satellite imagery, force, Cypherpunks, Coderpunks, TRW, remailers, replay, redheads, RX-7, explicit, FLAME, Pornstars, AVN, Playboy, Anonymous, Sex, chaining, codes, Nuclear, 20, subversives, SLIP, toad, fish, data havens, unix, c, a, b, d, the, Elvis, quiche, DES, 1*, NATIA, NATOA, sneakers, counterintelligence, industrial espionage, PI, TSCI, industrial intelligence, H.N.P., Juiliett Class Submarine, Locks, loch, Ingram Mac-10, sigvoice, ssa, E.O.D., SEMTEX, penrep, racal, OTP, OSS, Blowpipe, CCS, GSA, Kilo Class, squib, primacord, RSP, Becker, Nerd, fangs, Austin, Comirex, GPMG, Speakeasy, humint, GEODSS, SORO, M5, ANC, zone, SBI, DSS, S.A.I.C., Minox, Keyhole, SAR, Rand Corporation, Wackenhutt, EO, Wackendude, mol, Hillal, GGL, CTU, botux, Virii, CCC, Blacklisted 411, Internet Underground, XS4ALL, Retinal Fetish, Fetish, Yobie, CTP, CATO, Phon-e, Chicago Posse, l0ck, spook keywords, PLA, TDYC, W3, CUD, CdC, Weekly World News, Zen, World Domination, Dead, GRU, M72750, Salsa, 7, Blowfish, Gorelick, Glock, Ft. Meade, press-release, Indigo, wire transfer, e-cash, Bubba the Love Sponge, Digicash, zip, SWAT, Ortega, PPP, crypto-anarchy, AT&T, SGI, SUN, MCI, Blacknet, Middleman, KLM, Blackbird, plutonium, Texas, jihad, SDI, Uzi, Fort Meade, supercomputer, bullion, 3, Blackmednet, Propaganda, ABC, Satellite phones, Planet-1, cryptanalysis, nuclear, FBI, Panama, fissionable, Sears Tower, NORAD, Delta Force, SEAL, virtual, Dolch, secure shell, screws, Black-Ops, Area51, SABC, basement, data-haven, black-bag, TEMPSET, Goodwin, rebels, ID, MD5, IDEA, garbage, market, beef, Stego, unclassified, utopia, orthodox, Alica, SHA, Global, gorilla, Bob, Pseudonyms, MITM, Gray Data, VLSI, mega, Leitrim, Yakima, Sugar Grove, Cowboy, Gist, 8182, Gatt, Platform, 1911, Geraldton, UKUSA, veggie, 3848, Morwenstow, Consul, Oratory, Pine Gap, Menwith, Mantis, DSD, BVD, 1984, Flintlock, cybercash, government, hate, speedbump, illuminati, president, freedom, cocaine, $, Roswell, ESN, COS, E.T., credit card, b9, fraud, assasinate, virus, anarchy, rogue, mailbomb, 888, Chelsea, 1997, Whitewater, MOD, York, plutonium, William Gates, clone, BATF, SGDN, Nike, Atlas, Delta, TWA, Kiwi, PGP 2.6.2., PGP 5.0i, PGP 5.1, siliconpimp, Lynch, 414, Face, Pixar, IRIDF, eternity server, Skytel, Yukon, Templeton, LUK, Cohiba, Soros, Standford, niche, 51, H&K, USP, ^, sardine, bank, EUB, USP, PCS, NRO, Red Cell, Glock 26, snuffle, Patel, package, ISI, INR, INS, IRS, GRU, RUOP, GSS, NSP, SRI, Ronco, Armani, BOSS, Chobetsu, FBIS, BND, SISDE, FSB, BfV, IB, froglegs, JITEM, SADF, advise, TUSA, HoHoCon, SISMI, FIS, MSW, Spyderco, UOP, SSCI, NIMA, MOIS, SVR, SIN, advisors, SAP, OAU, PFS, Aladdin, chameleon man, Hutsul, CESID, Bess, rail gun, Peering, 17, 312, NB, CBM, CTP, Sardine, SBIRS, SGDN, ADIU, DEADBEEF, IDP, IDF, Halibut, SONANGOL, Flu, &, Loin, PGP 5.53, EG&G, AIEWS, AMW, WORM, MP5K-SD, 1071, WINGS, cdi, DynCorp, UXO, Ti, THAAD, package, chosen, PRIME, SURVIAC


CIAO farty
 
So, contrary to my initial impression, here's hoping you continue getting yourself banned and quickly! ;)
 
We're not talking about that, we're talking about the astrophysics of black holes.
There is no such thing as black hole astrophysics. Black hole discussions fall under the theoretical physics umbrella. Do you think because a full cripple wrote something in a book that this creates fact?

Lol

We finally have the first image of a black hole and it matches the predictions that came from that theoretical physics. Yes, black holes are moving from mathematical constructs to observed phenomena. And Hawking was always smarter than you. The mere fact that you choose to mock him from a position of ignorance tells me that.
Whaa!aaaa.

Theory of the day

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

That's the way science works, scientists get an idea, test it against observable phenomena, publish it and get other scientists to test it out. Of course some will be rejected and proven false. That's how it works. You should know that. Figured out how telescopes work yet?
There is no observable phenomena outside this universe.

How old are you really, I know your mental age is perhaps 15

Really? Feeble insults like that, especially when you can't figure out how telescopee work?
 

Forum List

Back
Top