Liberals: There's No Racism In This Country

....at least the way you mean it.

No....really. There isn't. It's simply....no pun intended, a made up bête noire designed to fill Democrat fund risers, and ballot boxes.



1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.


2. As Victor Davis Hanson points out, ....
'The smears "racist," "fascist," "white privilege" and "Nazi" -- like "commie" of the 1950s -- are so overused as to become meaningless.'




3. In the next several posts, John Hawkins gives an astute explanation of what Liberals mean by the term 'racism.'
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


a. "You disagree with me: "The Republican Party is racist." "Sarah Palin is racist." There's a famous Tea Party sign that reads, "It doesn't matter what this sign says. You'll call it racism anyway!" Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. "Everybody" knows it.

In other words, liberals believe they can't be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be "racist" by default. It's about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a "poopy head," but it's how they think."

[Remember that definition of racist as a conservative winning an argument? Yup.]



b. " I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people "racist." Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn't find enough things to call "racist," they'd be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living."



c. "Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election?

Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can't even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option."



Yup, yup....and yup!!

Now....you simple-minded folks who have been persuaded to vote against the imagined 'racism'....don't you feel stooooopid?

Tank, shootspeeders, et al will find your theory of racism surprising as they learn they are in fact liberals, i.e.,liberals are those who support Affirmative Action / consent decrees, equal rights and equal opportunities for minorities, women, the disadvantaged and children - all people and issues under attack by some in our society.

Since callous conservatives are a minority in this country, PC may one day be provided some relief by liberal policies when Medicare for All provides therapy and anti psychotic meds.
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....
the abortion thing is spot on. genocide paid for with tax payer money. sick.

The above, in a way, is why we shouldn't really fear conservatism. It's too stupid to ever get anywhere.
who invented the KKK. Who owns the cities with the most blacks in poverty? yep, you got it, the dems. Who puts up the good abortion fight to limit black babies? yep you got it dems. no one else. it's amazing the stupid that is a lib.
Dems do not own cities, citizens do...Genocide~the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. Where is the deliberate involuntary killing of black babies only in the USA?
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....
the abortion thing is spot on. genocide paid for with tax payer money. sick.

The above, in a way, is why we shouldn't really fear conservatism. It's too stupid to ever get anywhere.
They do tend to walk far out on the limb to grab any nut they can get...

Do they make idiotic claims like abortion is genocide because they really believe it, or because they are addicted to trolling?

And which would be worse?
It's an actual statement from a christian organization...
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....

Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?

I believe men should be encouraged to stay with and help the women they knock up. The woman should not be left to fend for herself. Deal with the cause, not the symptom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....

Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?

I believe men should be encouraged to stay with and help the women they knock up. The woman should not be left to fend for herself. Deal with the cause, not the symptom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your answer as usual has nothing to do with my question. And I know why.
 
....at least the way you mean it.

No....really. There isn't. It's simply....no pun intended, a made up bête noire designed to fill Democrat fund risers, and ballot boxes.



1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.


2. As Victor Davis Hanson points out, ....
'The smears "racist," "fascist," "white privilege" and "Nazi" -- like "commie" of the 1950s -- are so overused as to become meaningless.'




3. In the next several posts, John Hawkins gives an astute explanation of what Liberals mean by the term 'racism.'
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


a. "You disagree with me: "The Republican Party is racist." "Sarah Palin is racist." There's a famous Tea Party sign that reads, "It doesn't matter what this sign says. You'll call it racism anyway!" Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. "Everybody" knows it.

In other words, liberals believe they can't be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be "racist" by default. It's about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a "poopy head," but it's how they think."

[Remember that definition of racist as a conservative winning an argument? Yup.]



b. " I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people "racist." Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn't find enough things to call "racist," they'd be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living."



c. "Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election?

Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can't even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option."



Yup, yup....and yup!!

Now....you simple-minded folks who have been persuaded to vote against the imagined 'racism'....don't you feel stooooopid?

Tank, shootspeeders, et al will find your theory of racism surprising as they learn they are in fact liberals, i.e.,liberals are those who support Affirmative Action / consent decrees, equal rights and equal opportunities for minorities, women, the disadvantaged and children - all people and issues under attack by some in our society.

Since callous conservatives are a minority in this country, PC may one day be provided some relief by liberal policies when Medicare for All provides therapy and anti psychotic meds.



Will there ever come a day when you posts are less than hot air and 'I hate you'?

Will you ever actually confront what causes you to become irate.e...that is, the truth.

On the other hand, of course, you vacuous post are a time saver, because, after all...I am never wrong or incorrect in any way.


As in this, from the OP:


1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.



See what I mean? 100% correct, accurate and insightful.
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....

Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?

I believe men should be encouraged to stay with and help the women they knock up. The woman should not be left to fend for herself. Deal with the cause, not the symptom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your answer as usual has nothing to do with my question. And I know why.

Apparently, you don't. Those children don't deserve being abandoned by boys (they don't deserve to be called men), but they deserve even less to be killed without even a chance at living. Let's put it this way. Isn't it racist to say that there are too many black children being born?

As usual, you want to focus on the tree while ignoring the forest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....
the abortion thing is spot on. genocide paid for with tax payer money. sick.
And who is forcing these women to have abortions?
No body is trying to stop them. Liberals the more dead black babies the better.
 
....at least the way you mean it.

No....really. There isn't. It's simply....no pun intended, a made up bête noire designed to fill Democrat fund risers, and ballot boxes.



1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.


2. As Victor Davis Hanson points out, ....
'The smears "racist," "fascist," "white privilege" and "Nazi" -- like "commie" of the 1950s -- are so overused as to become meaningless.'




3. In the next several posts, John Hawkins gives an astute explanation of what Liberals mean by the term 'racism.'
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


a. "You disagree with me: "The Republican Party is racist." "Sarah Palin is racist." There's a famous Tea Party sign that reads, "It doesn't matter what this sign says. You'll call it racism anyway!" Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. "Everybody" knows it.

In other words, liberals believe they can't be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be "racist" by default. It's about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a "poopy head," but it's how they think."

[Remember that definition of racist as a conservative winning an argument? Yup.]



b. " I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people "racist." Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn't find enough things to call "racist," they'd be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living."



c. "Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election?

Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can't even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option."



Yup, yup....and yup!!

Now....you simple-minded folks who have been persuaded to vote against the imagined 'racism'....don't you feel stooooopid?

I wonder why the OP thinks that black Americans overwhelmingly vote Democrat ONLY because of race issues, or the perception thereof?
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....

Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?

I believe men should be encouraged to stay with and help the women they knock up. The woman should not be left to fend for herself. Deal with the cause, not the symptom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your answer as usual has nothing to do with my question. And I know why.

Apparently, you don't. Those children don't deserve being abandoned by boys (they don't deserve to be called men), but they deserve even less to be killed without even a chance at living. Let's put it this way. Isn't it racist to say that there are too many black children being born?

As usual, you want to focus on the tree while ignoring the forest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your position on the poor woman who has an unwanted pregnancy and does not want another child?
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....
the abortion thing is spot on. genocide paid for with tax payer money. sick.

The above, in a way, is why we shouldn't really fear conservatism. It's too stupid to ever get anywhere.
They do tend to walk far out on the limb to grab any nut they can get...

Do they make idiotic claims like abortion is genocide because they really believe it, or because they are addicted to trolling?

And which would be worse?
It's an actual statement from a christian organization...

Yeah, I've seen the like. Crazies posing as Christians, or thinking they're Christians.

I believe it's a troll tactic with flaming as its only motive, at least around here. I can't believe these people genuinely believe that the opportunity to choose legal abortion is genocide.
 
....at least the way you mean it.

No....really. There isn't. It's simply....no pun intended, a made up bête noire designed to fill Democrat fund risers, and ballot boxes.



1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.


2. As Victor Davis Hanson points out, ....
'The smears "racist," "fascist," "white privilege" and "Nazi" -- like "commie" of the 1950s -- are so overused as to become meaningless.'




3. In the next several posts, John Hawkins gives an astute explanation of what Liberals mean by the term 'racism.'
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


a. "You disagree with me: "The Republican Party is racist." "Sarah Palin is racist." There's a famous Tea Party sign that reads, "It doesn't matter what this sign says. You'll call it racism anyway!" Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. "Everybody" knows it.

In other words, liberals believe they can't be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be "racist" by default. It's about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a "poopy head," but it's how they think."

[Remember that definition of racist as a conservative winning an argument? Yup.]



b. " I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people "racist." Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn't find enough things to call "racist," they'd be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living."



c. "Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election?

Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can't even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option."



Yup, yup....and yup!!

Now....you simple-minded folks who have been persuaded to vote against the imagined 'racism'....don't you feel stooooopid?

Tank, shootspeeders, et al will find your theory of racism surprising as they learn they are in fact liberals, i.e.,liberals are those who support Affirmative Action / consent decrees, equal rights and equal opportunities for minorities, women, the disadvantaged and children - all people and issues under attack by some in our society.

Since callous conservatives are a minority in this country, PC may one day be provided some relief by liberal policies when Medicare for All provides therapy and anti psychotic meds.



Will there ever come a day when you posts are less than hot air and 'I hate you'?

Will you ever actually confront what causes you to become irate.e...that is, the truth.

On the other hand, of course, you vacuous post are a time saver, because, after all...I am never wrong or incorrect in any way.


As in this, from the OP:


1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.



See what I mean? 100% correct, accurate and insightful.

I don't hate you, I pity you. Until you admit to yourself that you suffer from a personality disorder, there is no help for you. I simply try to counsel you, as I have done for most of my life, helping those who need help.
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....
the abortion thing is spot on. genocide paid for with tax payer money. sick.

The above, in a way, is why we shouldn't really fear conservatism. It's too stupid to ever get anywhere.
They do tend to walk far out on the limb to grab any nut they can get...

Do they make idiotic claims like abortion is genocide because they really believe it, or because they are addicted to trolling?

And which would be worse?
Liberals has made abortion socially acceptable, heck you sickos brag about having them now.
 
Riiiight but according to people like you there is a genocide of black babies through abortion...Yeah love that two faced two step rhetoric...Everyone dance now....

Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?
If you already have several children and you don't know about birth control. You may be a liberal.
 
Which party champions abortion and which doesn't?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you believe that poor women already financially burdened with several children should be encouraged NOT to have an abortion? Why?

I believe men should be encouraged to stay with and help the women they knock up. The woman should not be left to fend for herself. Deal with the cause, not the symptom.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your answer as usual has nothing to do with my question. And I know why.

Apparently, you don't. Those children don't deserve being abandoned by boys (they don't deserve to be called men), but they deserve even less to be killed without even a chance at living. Let's put it this way. Isn't it racist to say that there are too many black children being born?

As usual, you want to focus on the tree while ignoring the forest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So what is your position on the poor woman who has an unwanted pregnancy and does not want another child?

First, do everything possible to identify the father and hold him responsible. Making it harder to dump and run would cut down the numbers of babies being dumped on society. In essence, that's what we're really talking about, what to do with babies not wanted by their parents. I won't call them unwanted because there are couples who spend a lot of time and money trying to adopt a baby.

I'm not stupid, if we want the babies to have a chance at life, we should give them a good chance at it. Those babies should be born and cared for. I do not accept the premise that not being wanted by parents or by society should be a death sentence. Is that we do, the homeless population would shrunk dramatically.

The ultimate solution, as it always has been, lies not in government programs, but rather in what society expects. Instead of glorifying single parenthood, let's glorify stable nuclear families. Instead of championing men who have multiple children with multiple women who don't take care of them, let's champion men who sacrifice their immediate gratification for the good of their families. Continuing to deal only with the symptoms ensures that they will never go away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Wow! This thread apparently got hijacked into an abortion argument.

But to the Op I would say that while I normally agree with you, to say that there is NO racism is discounting mankind's proclivity toward being asshole's.
There will always be some racist's. It's man's nature.
 
....at least the way you mean it.

No....really. There isn't. It's simply....no pun intended, a made up bête noire designed to fill Democrat fund risers, and ballot boxes.



1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.


2. As Victor Davis Hanson points out, ....
'The smears "racist," "fascist," "white privilege" and "Nazi" -- like "commie" of the 1950s -- are so overused as to become meaningless.'




3. In the next several posts, John Hawkins gives an astute explanation of what Liberals mean by the term 'racism.'
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”


a. "You disagree with me: "The Republican Party is racist." "Sarah Palin is racist." There's a famous Tea Party sign that reads, "It doesn't matter what this sign says. You'll call it racism anyway!" Why are these people and groups racist? They JUST ARE. "Everybody" knows it.

In other words, liberals believe they can't be racist by virtue of being liberal; so people or groups that oppose them must be "racist" by default. It's about as intellectual as a five year old calling someone a "poopy head," but it's how they think."

[Remember that definition of racist as a conservative winning an argument? Yup.]



b. " I need more attention and/or money: There are an awful lot of people in the Democrat Party who make a living calling people "racist." Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Toure, Joy Reid, Eric Dyson, the NAACP, Tavis Smiley, Cornell West and Ben Jealous rely on finding new and intriguing ways to accuse people of bigotry to fill their pockets and get in front of cameras. If they couldn't find enough things to call "racist," they'd be nobodies and worse yet, some of them might have to get real jobs instead of pretending to be offended for a living."



c. "Let’s take a choice away from black Americans: No group in Congress does less to make the lives of its constituents better than the Congressional Black Caucus. Furthermore, no ethnic group in America has been more loyal to a political party with less to show for it than black Americans. So how can it be that the Democrat Party has been an absolute disaster for black Americans, yet it can count on 90% of the black vote every election?

Simple; liberals have falsely convinced black Americans that Republicans hate them. That means no matter how bad it gets, Republicans can't even be considered as an option. This is how Democrats have managed to utterly destroy cities like Detroit without the populace even considering the Republican Party as an option."



Yup, yup....and yup!!

Now....you simple-minded folks who have been persuaded to vote against the imagined 'racism'....don't you feel stooooopid?

Tank, shootspeeders, et al will find your theory of racism surprising as they learn they are in fact liberals, i.e.,liberals are those who support Affirmative Action / consent decrees, equal rights and equal opportunities for minorities, women, the disadvantaged and children - all people and issues under attack by some in our society.

Since callous conservatives are a minority in this country, PC may one day be provided some relief by liberal policies when Medicare for All provides therapy and anti psychotic meds.



Will there ever come a day when you posts are less than hot air and 'I hate you'?

Will you ever actually confront what causes you to become irate.e...that is, the truth.

On the other hand, of course, you vacuous post are a time saver, because, after all...I am never wrong or incorrect in any way.


As in this, from the OP:


1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.



See what I mean? 100% correct, accurate and insightful.

I don't hate you, I pity you. Until you admit to yourself that you suffer from a personality disorder, there is no help for you. I simply try to counsel you, as I have done for most of my life, helping those who need help.



Look who's duckin' and dodgin'!!!

The ol' windbag himself!!!!!


And all it took to prove that you are our greatest source of Greenhouse Gases was this:

Will there ever come a day when you posts are less than hot air and 'I hate you'?

Will you ever actually confront what causes you to become irate.e...that is, the truth.

On the other hand, of course, you vacuous post are a time saver, because, after all...I am never wrong or incorrect in any way.


As in this, from the OP:


1. As with all intellectual discussions, it is best to define terms. To be a description of something worth fighting, becoming violent about, or using all sorts of punishment against, well....it need be something that can be shown to cause physical or monetary harm.

If it means not liking some other entity, well....that is both protected by the first amendment, as 'thought crimes' are the sort found under totalitarian authorities....

....and is a pretense that the target of the dislike is too weak to shrug it off.
We conservatives are targets of such contumely constantly.....and simply continue on.



See what I mean? 100% correct, accurate and insightful.
 
Wow! This thread apparently got hijacked into an abortion argument.

But to the Op I would say that while I normally agree with you, to say that there is NO racism is discounting mankind's proclivity toward being asshole's.
There will always be some racist's. It's man's nature.


The OP is about the definition of racism.

I stand by the premise.




Well known is the fact that in the marketplace of ideas, in debate.....conservatives eat Liberals' lunch.

Hawkins explains why.....what is important to the Liberal agenda is not what is said....but who says it.


d. "You are disagreeing with a minority: The last thing any liberal wants is to argue an issue on its merits. Is it logical? Does it work? Is the benefit worth the cost? These things have NOTHING to do with why liberals support a position.


So, one of the many ways they try to get people off track is to accuse any white person arguing with a minority of being racist. This is a neat trick, given that roughly 70% of Hispanic Americans and 90% of black Americans vote Democrat. Maybe Republicans should adopt this one and start accusing liberals who disagree with Allen West, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz of being racists."
- 7 Things Liberals REALLY MEAN When They Cry “Racism”
 

Forum List

Back
Top