Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #1,361
A long sentence for having caused the woman to lose her baby. Maybe even attempted murder of the woman, depending on the circumstances. But no, not murder of the fetus.I am not asking what the legal definition is, I'm asking what your opinion is, and what other leftists would think?They should do a very long sentence. Is it murder? That's a legal question depending on what that jurisdiction has on its books.So, do you then agree that anyone that is currently serving a prison sentence for murder because their actions may have cause the death of an unborn baby, they should be left out of prison, right?NorthKoreaChic doesn't want to live in a free society. Maybe she should move back to you know where.
Since the unborn bab....umm..the unremoved tissue is not a person, no murder could have taken place. Do you agree with this?
You're very clear to make a distinction when it comes to abortion that it is not a person and therefore it is not murder to have an abortion, but when someone asks you a question about someone else taking the life of an unborn baby, the left starts talking about legal definitions and you have to let lawyers make that call.
I've had people give me this response in the past about this question, and it is hard to ever get a straight answer. If the abortion is not a person, but just a ball of tissue, then if someone causes a woman to lose her pregnancy, then it also cannot be murder because it is still a ball of tissue, right?
I'm just asking your opinion, not legally, do you consider someone, who has caused a woman to lose her pregnancy, to have committed murder?
Also, you said they should do a very long sentence...why may I ask? If what the woman had inside her is not a person, then the worst they could be charged with is destruction of property? That is usually a misdemeanor and generally carries a light sentence, often, just a fine.