Legalizing Marijuana

He should have gotten life.

There is a way to deal with drug addicts. Bring back the chain gang and put them to work in the fields, send the illegals packing.

This is a sensible alternative to our imprisoning drug users.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/world/asia/08china.html?_r=0

Our rehab doesn't work. Users get out and immediately start using again. It just doesn't last long enough. Two years of physical labor is a much more realistic timeframe.

LIFE ?
We're talking Marijuana, not heroin, not crack cocaine, or Meth... but a plant. A plant that I would love to garden in my own back yard, or at least be able to purchase just as one would cigarettes (which is WAY deadlier than pot btw) or alcohol.
It's not some man made synthetic bs...it's weed.
 
He should have gotten life.

Two consenting adults engaging in activity that does not harm another and does not involve taking what doesn't belong to them...and you want to lock them up for life?

Wow.

It would serve as an excellent example to others.

This kid may get 25 years for smoking pot (and killing four people in a car crash).

Queens teenager Joseph Beer faces 25 years in prison for car crash that killed three friends  - NY Daily News

Another marijuana killer.

Driver charged with DUI marijuana after fatal crash in Vancouver, WA | Q13 FOX News

What was that about marijuana not harming others?

Do babies count, or does that come under post birth abortion protection?

Pot smoking mother drives off with baby on car roof | Reuters

Marijuana has never been known to cause harm, except....

Byron Nelson student sickened by marijuana-laced brownie | Breaking News | News from For...
A 15-year-old student at Byron Nelson High School faces drug charges after authorities say he gave a marijuana-laced brownie to a classmate who became unconscious and had to be rushed to a hospital, Trophy Club police said Tuesday.


Phillipsburg High School students sickened by marijuana-laced cookies, police say | lehighvalleylive.com

School authorities along with police later learned that several students had ingested the cookies laced with the drug, the news release says. Police did not indicate in the release exactly how many students were affected or how they came in possession of the cookies.

The release says the affected students were taken to St. Luke's Hospital in Phillipsburg for treatment.

Eight students sickened by marijuana-laced food in L. A. school - People's Daily Online
Marijuana-laced food sickened eight students at George Washington Carver Middle School in South Los Angeles on Thursday, authorities said.

The students became ill after eating a "brownie-type dessert" that was possibly laced with marijuana, said Erik Scott of the Los Angeles Fire Department.

What's this about only being used by consenting adults? It's not true so why mention it.

Suspected marijuana laced cookies sickens Molokai High students | KHON2 Hawaii's News Leader

VALLEJO: School Children Sickened By Marijuana Cookies | www.ktvu.com

There was a time when poisoners were called witches because they made potions that sickened people. They were burned at the stake. It's time to bring that back.
 
He should have gotten life.

There is a way to deal with drug addicts. Bring back the chain gang and put them to work in the fields, send the illegals packing.

This is a sensible alternative to our imprisoning drug users.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/world/asia/08china.html?_r=0

Our rehab doesn't work. Users get out and immediately start using again. It just doesn't last long enough. Two years of physical labor is a much more realistic timeframe.

LIFE ?
We're talking Marijuana, not heroin, not crack cocaine, or Meth... but a plant. A plant that I would love to garden in my own back yard, or at least be able to purchase just as one would cigarettes (which is WAY deadlier than pot btw) or alcohol.
It's not some man made synthetic bs...it's weed.

Poppies are a plant too - that is where opium and heroin comes from Cocao is also a plant that they make cocaine and crack-cocaine from. Just because it has a natural source doesn't mean it should be used.
 
He should have gotten life.

Two consenting adults engaging in activity that does not harm another and does not involve taking what doesn't belong to them...and you want to lock them up for life?

Wow.

It would serve as an excellent example to others.

This kid may get 25 years for smoking pot (and killing four people in a car crash).

Queens teenager Joseph Beer faces 25 years in prison for car crash that killed three friends* - NY Daily News

Another marijuana killer.

Driver charged with DUI marijuana after fatal crash in Vancouver, WA | Q13 FOX News

What was that about marijuana not harming others?

Do babies count, or does that come under post birth abortion protection?

Pot smoking mother drives off with baby on car roof | Reuters

Marijuana has never been known to cause harm, except....

Byron Nelson student sickened by marijuana-laced brownie | Breaking News | News from For...
A 15-year-old student at Byron Nelson High School faces drug charges after authorities say he gave a marijuana-laced brownie to a classmate who became unconscious and had to be rushed to a hospital, Trophy Club police said Tuesday.


Phillipsburg High School students sickened by marijuana-laced cookies, police say | lehighvalleylive.com

School authorities along with police later learned that several students had ingested the cookies laced with the drug, the news release says. Police did not indicate in the release exactly how many students were affected or how they came in possession of the cookies.

The release says the affected students were taken to St. Luke's Hospital in Phillipsburg for treatment.

Eight students sickened by marijuana-laced food in L. A. school - People's Daily Online
Marijuana-laced food sickened eight students at George Washington Carver Middle School in South Los Angeles on Thursday, authorities said.

The students became ill after eating a "brownie-type dessert" that was possibly laced with marijuana, said Erik Scott of the Los Angeles Fire Department.

What's this about only being used by consenting adults? It's not true so why mention it.

Suspected marijuana laced cookies sickens Molokai High students | KHON2 Hawaii's News Leader

VALLEJO: School Children Sickened By Marijuana Cookies | www.ktvu.com

There was a time when poisoners were called witches because they made potions that sickened people. They were burned at the stake. It's time to bring that back.

I have no problem with punishing someone that kills another...or hands out a potion that makes others sick. Activity that harms no other? That is none of your business.
 
He should have gotten life.

There is a way to deal with drug addicts. Bring back the chain gang and put them to work in the fields, send the illegals packing.

This is a sensible alternative to our imprisoning drug users.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/world/asia/08china.html?_r=0

Our rehab doesn't work. Users get out and immediately start using again. It just doesn't last long enough. Two years of physical labor is a much more realistic timeframe.

LIFE ?
We're talking Marijuana, not heroin, not crack cocaine, or Meth... but a plant. A plant that I would love to garden in my own back yard, or at least be able to purchase just as one would cigarettes (which is WAY deadlier than pot btw) or alcohol.
It's not some man made synthetic bs...it's weed.

Poppies are a plant too - that is where opium and heroin comes from Cocao is also a plant that they make cocaine and crack-cocaine from. Just because it has a natural source doesn't mean it should be used.

Yes, I do know where heroin and coke comes from...but those are made from the derivatives of the plants that make it into the drug. Marijuana is basically grown, harvested and distributed...(except for the thc pills that is given to cancer patients and the like)
Marijuana doesn't 'tweak' you out like meth and cocaine, it's far safer and of much more benefit to those who medicinally need it, and WAY safer than drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes for those who just want to hang out and goof off...
 
Marijuana doesn't 'tweak' you out like meth and cocaine, it's far safer and of much more benefit to those who medicinally need it, and WAY safer than drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes for those who just want to hang out and goof off...

Personally, I don't care what a adult chooses to put into his own body. Shoot up with gasoline for all I care. As long as you're not taking what doesn't belong to you or hurting another person by your actions, it should be nobody's damn business.

When you go down the "marijuana is safe" route, you run into all kinds of conflicting evidence and comparisons to other banned substances. Stick to the idea of personal liberty and there is no argument outside of what every nanny state central planner thinks he knows...that his ideas are what's best for everyone else...:doubt:
 
I highly' recommend the book "I Should Robbed A Bank" by Hugh Yonn to those for and against legalization.

386fa9a4bba3b1492b0d59c7f3682adc.png


The man served FIVE years for a marijuana offense, while others, such as armed bank robbers, came and went..some in for no more than twenty months.
It's insane that he had to sit FIVE years, yet other offenders such as child molestors, rapists, murderers and other criminals roam free after just short stay.
I personally know of someone who is about to get released after sitting only five months for child molestation...WTF?
That little girl will be scarred for life, yet he gets to go free to do it again???

I guess busting folks with weed and keeping them incarcerated is much more important than keeping a disgusting pig of a man off the street and away from little girls.

It's possible to ferret out the truth. Yonn wasn't merely some user caught with a joint. He was a trafficker and a smuggler. Smuggling drugs and selling them is hardly a victimless crime.

Shockingly enough, he paid off his IRS using the proceeds of his drug sales and the debt was deemed satisifed when it should have been reinstated with penalties and interest since he paid the debt with the proceeds of criminal activity.

Try again, this guy is a criminal under any circumstances.

Shoulda Robbed a Bank, a novel by Hugh Yonn - Portland cannabis | Examiner.com

So, are you telling me that he's more of a criminal than a baby rapist? That he sat for five years yet a baby rapist only sits 5 months?
I hardly call that 'right'.
 
I think there are legitimate arguments to be made in support of this proposition, but the alleged medical benefits of Marijuana and its analogy to tobacco are not among them. First, the active ingredients in MJ are already legally obtainable with a Doctor's prescription. Secondly, tobacco is legal only because of its historically widespread usage. If it was introduced today, it would never receive FDA approval. In the absence of any credible medical studies to the contrary, it must be assumed that the same harmful effects of ingesting carbonized tobacco particles would be realized by ingesting carbonized MJ particles into your lungs.

That being said, society should have the ability to evaluate its laws based on a cost-benefit analysis. Whether the costs of exposing more children to marijuana and trying to enforce impaired driving laws are outweighed by the benefits of lower drug enforcement and incarceration expenses is an open question. As with the death penalty, practical considerations may trump moral imperatives. What say you?
In spite of the seemingly logical content of your commentary there is no record anywhere in the annals of medical science of marijuana having caused a single death or pathology. Not one.

Next, in spite of NIDA propaganda, there has been no successful effort to synthetically duplicate the beneficial effects of ingesting natural cannabis sativa. (Ref: Marijuana, The Forbidden Medicine, by Dr. Lester Grinspoon, MD, Ph.D., Professor of Psychiatric Medicine, Harvard Medical School.)

Last, NIDA propaganda re: the projected "harmful pulmonary effects of smoking marijuana" is predicated on lab analysis of marijuana samples derived from batches of illegally grown plants seized by DEA, most of which is typically contaminated with pesticides and growth-inducing hormones. One such batch was found to be radioactive because it was grown in a condemned medical waste dump. (Ref: The Emperor Wears No Clothes," by Jack Herer.)

Cleanly grown cannabis is absolutely benign. What should be kept in mind the average tobacco cigarette contains numerous chemicals intended to enhance the effect of nicotine, all of which are converted to carcinogenic properties when burned. If you will closely examine any markerted cigarette you will see faint grey circles running the length of the paper. This is dried potassium nitrate. Its purpose is to keep the cigarette burning. It is a known carcinogenic when burned.

Consider the average cigarette user smokes between twenty and thirty cigarettes a day, whereas even a heavy marijuana user rarely ingests more than the comparable content of two cigarettes in a day. Also consider that the vast majority of marijuana smokers do not indulge every day and those who do use a bong or a pipe, which significantly cools the smoke. So there is absolutely no comparison between the negative effects of the two entities. Sensible use of marijuana is relatively harmless.

Briefly stated, you have been influenced by federal propaganda. You should do your obviously healthy intellect a favor by researching this topic. I promise you will be surprised by what you will learn.
 
Poppies are a plant too - that is where opium and heroin comes from Cocao is also a plant that they make cocaine and crack-cocaine from. Just because it has a natural source doesn't mean it should be used.
Using opium, heroin, etc., requires laboratory processing to alter the chemical properties and derive the narcotic. No such processing is required to enjoy the benign, tranquilizing euphoria of naturally occurring cannabis sativa (marijuana).
 
Opium is the secretions from the seed pod and is used without futher refining - it is addictive and deadly. Cocoa leaves are used as they come off the plant - again addictive. The refinement process makes them more potent and a lot easier to distribute but it is simple to make leaves into cocaine and tar into heroine. Thats why they are so prevalent - easy to get, make and distribute.
Yes, pot is less dangerous to the individual than other drugs - including alcohol but it is more dangerous to a society because of its effects on short term memory and the lethargy and supression of physical activity that it causes. While it is not addictive it can be habitual for those who are susceptible to it.
The big difference between it (pot) and alcohol is that you can readily identify someone under the influence of alcohol but not so pot. Someone can be putting you at risk on the roads, workplace or even in your own home and you have no way to defend against it. Pot rarely causes agression or even personality changes other than lethargy and silliness but it does affect the persons ability to make reasonable choices.
Do we really need another such drug in our lives?
Decriminalize it, YES! but legalize it? I really doubt that is a good idea.
 
Do we really need another such drug in our lives?

Then don't do it.

Your fears of what MIGHT occur when someone chooses to ingest a particular substance does not give you the right to make criminals out of people that have not harmed or taken from another.
 
He should have gotten life.

Two consenting adults engaging in activity that does not harm another and does not involve taking what doesn't belong to them...and you want to lock them up for life?

Wow.

It would serve as an excellent example to others.

This kid may get 25 years for smoking pot (and killing four people in a car crash).

Queens teenager Joseph Beer faces 25 years in prison for car crash that killed three friends* - NY Daily News

Another marijuana killer.

Driver charged with DUI marijuana after fatal crash in Vancouver, WA | Q13 FOX News

What was that about marijuana not harming others?

Do babies count, or does that come under post birth abortion protection?

Pot smoking mother drives off with baby on car roof | Reuters

Marijuana has never been known to cause harm, except....

Byron Nelson student sickened by marijuana-laced brownie | Breaking News | News from For...
A 15-year-old student at Byron Nelson High School faces drug charges after authorities say he gave a marijuana-laced brownie to a classmate who became unconscious and had to be rushed to a hospital, Trophy Club police said Tuesday.


Phillipsburg High School students sickened by marijuana-laced cookies, police say | lehighvalleylive.com

School authorities along with police later learned that several students had ingested the cookies laced with the drug, the news release says. Police did not indicate in the release exactly how many students were affected or how they came in possession of the cookies.

The release says the affected students were taken to St. Luke's Hospital in Phillipsburg for treatment.

Eight students sickened by marijuana-laced food in L. A. school - People's Daily Online
Marijuana-laced food sickened eight students at George Washington Carver Middle School in South Los Angeles on Thursday, authorities said.

The students became ill after eating a "brownie-type dessert" that was possibly laced with marijuana, said Erik Scott of the Los Angeles Fire Department.

What's this about only being used by consenting adults? It's not true so why mention it.

Suspected marijuana laced cookies sickens Molokai High students | KHON2 Hawaii's News Leader

VALLEJO: School Children Sickened By Marijuana Cookies | www.ktvu.com

There was a time when poisoners were called witches because they made potions that sickened people. They were burned at the stake. It's time to bring that back.

Yet again you demonstrate that you're not only utterly unfamiliar with rational thought, but that you're a complete fucking idiot.

What you're describing are acts that were already illegal. The MJ was coincidental to them.

I'd ask you to pull your head out of your ass, but I don't want to disturb your fantasy about burning people at the stake.
 
[...]

Yes, pot is less dangerous to the individual than other drugs - including alcohol but it is more dangerous to a society because of its effects on short term memory and the lethargy and supression of physical activity that it causes. While it is not addictive it can be habitual for those who are susceptible to it.

The big difference between it (pot) and alcohol is that you can readily identify someone under the influence of alcohol but not so pot. Someone can be putting you at risk on the roads, workplace or even in your own home and you have no way to defend against it. Pot rarely causes agression or even personality changes other than lethargy and silliness but it does affect the persons ability to make reasonable choices.
The above is typical of the kind of rationalized nonsense put forth by narcs to justify their wholly redundant and counterproductive existence.

Do we really need another such drug in our lives?
There are many things we don't need in our lives but which we choose to enjoy -- such as excess calories. And when the lies and the nonsense is eliminated from the marijuana debate the fact which remains is the most negative element in the marijuana issue is the effect its prohibition has imposed on the recreational use of this relatively benign plant.

Were it not for marijuana prohibition, which has driven a relatively harmless natural substance into the depths of the criminal underworld, the public would by now be aware of the safest and most productive way to make use of it and the available supply would be pure and distributed in precisely measured amounts. The only negative effect of legalized marijuana would impact narcs and their associated public enemies.
 
Last edited:
Opium is the secretions from the seed pod and is used without futher refining - it is addictive and deadly. Cocoa leaves are used as they come off the plant - again addictive. The refinement process makes them more potent and a lot easier to distribute but it is simple to make leaves into cocaine and tar into heroine. Thats why they are so prevalent - easy to get, make and distribute.
Yes, pot is less dangerous to the individual than other drugs - including alcohol but it is more dangerous to a society because of its effects on short term memory and the lethargy and supression of physical activity that it causes. While it is not addictive it can be habitual for those who are susceptible to it.
The big difference between it (pot) and alcohol is that you can readily identify someone under the influence of alcohol but not so pot. Someone can be putting you at risk on the roads, workplace or even in your own home and you have no way to defend against it. Pot rarely causes agression or even personality changes other than lethargy and silliness but it does affect the persons ability to make reasonable choices.
Do we really need another such drug in our lives?
Decriminalize it, YES! but legalize it? I really doubt that is a good idea.

'more dangerous to society' is no excuse to illegalize behavior that does not impact anyone's rights or freedoms. If you want to destroy your own life, it is yours to destroy. Weather it is through cheeseburgers, pot or smoking tea bags, it is your body and your rights.

Decriminalization is a half assed way of addressing the problem. There is no argument that I can think of where decriminalization would suddenly be better than legalization. It is just a way for people to agree without having to face the fact they are talking about allowing people to actually be in control of themselves and what they put in their bodies.
 
He should have gotten life.

Two consenting adults engaging in activity that does not harm another and does not involve taking what doesn't belong to them...and you want to lock them up for life?

Wow.

It would serve as an excellent example to others.

This kid may get 25 years for smoking pot (and killing four people in a car crash).

Queens teenager Joseph Beer faces 25 years in prison for car crash that killed three friends* - NY Daily News

Another marijuana killer.

Driver charged with DUI marijuana after fatal crash in Vancouver, WA | Q13 FOX News

What was that about marijuana not harming others?

Do babies count, or does that come under post birth abortion protection?

Pot smoking mother drives off with baby on car roof | Reuters

Marijuana has never been known to cause harm, except....

Byron Nelson student sickened by marijuana-laced brownie | Breaking News | News from For...
A 15-year-old student at Byron Nelson High School faces drug charges after authorities say he gave a marijuana-laced brownie to a classmate who became unconscious and had to be rushed to a hospital, Trophy Club police said Tuesday.


Phillipsburg High School students sickened by marijuana-laced cookies, police say | lehighvalleylive.com

School authorities along with police later learned that several students had ingested the cookies laced with the drug, the news release says. Police did not indicate in the release exactly how many students were affected or how they came in possession of the cookies.

The release says the affected students were taken to St. Luke's Hospital in Phillipsburg for treatment.

Eight students sickened by marijuana-laced food in L. A. school - People's Daily Online
Marijuana-laced food sickened eight students at George Washington Carver Middle School in South Los Angeles on Thursday, authorities said.

The students became ill after eating a "brownie-type dessert" that was possibly laced with marijuana, said Erik Scott of the Los Angeles Fire Department.

What's this about only being used by consenting adults? It's not true so why mention it.

Suspected marijuana laced cookies sickens Molokai High students | KHON2 Hawaii's News Leader

VALLEJO: School Children Sickened By Marijuana Cookies | www.ktvu.com

There was a time when poisoners were called witches because they made potions that sickened people. They were burned at the stake. It's time to bring that back.
One of the negative effects of marijuana prohibition has been the obscurity its illegal status has endured. If this benign tranquilizer had not been so wrongly demonized its recreational and therapeutic uses would by now be well refined and carefully regulated.

For example, the fact that the most common means of using marijuana is smoking it in hand-rolled cigarette form, which typically delivers unmeasured doses of THC almost directly to the brain via the lungs, which often are affected by the residue of pesticides and growth hormones used by bootleg growers. Smoking marijuana in a pipe or a bong is somewhat less offensive to the organism but it still involves ingesting doses of unknown potency in a potentially irritating manner.

The fact is smoking marijuana is neither the only way to enjoy it, nor is it the best way. In fact if marijuana were legal it would be marketed in various edible forms, because the best way to ingest it is via the digestive system. The effect takes a bit longer to manifest but it lasts longer, is much more pleasant, and it has absolutely no negative influence on any part of the organism.

But cooking and baking with marijuana calls for specific knowledge and experience which remains largely obscured by the cloak of illegality. Consequently some ambitious experimenters, typically teen-agers, think the way to make pot brownies is to grind up some marijuana leaf and stir it into some ordinary brownie mix -- which will cause a number of digestive problems because that is not the way it's done.

Again, the preliminary steps involved in preparing marijuana for use in cooked or baked products calls for specific knowledge and experience, the lack of which will result in the problems described in the reports cited in your message.

The cause of those reported sicknesses is not marijuana but ignorance. And the cause of the ignorance is the obscurity brought about by the wholly unnecessary prohibition of a benign natural tranquilizer.
 
How about we evaluate laws based on the idea of liberty and individual freedom? If I'm not hurting another nor taking what doesn't belong to me, why are we even talking about a law?

What a consenting adult chooses to put in his own body is nobody else's business.

So true. We don't really have a drug problem. It's that the culture is so degenerate that so many people must be high just to get through the day. Although the people killed in accidents where the perpetrator might disagree with how harmless pot is. Pot is a symptom like alcoholism. If all the addictions were added up more than half the population suffers from some kind of depravity.

I have been thinking along these lines, perhaps too much.
Most of the advertising supports values that are not beneficial to society. Reinforced in almost everything offered on TV.

What about that 'little problem'?

I won't wait on the government to solve that problem for me---individual choice is faster. jmo.

A better question might be why is it illegal? Prohibition failed but Pot is still illegal. The libertarians rightly hate it.

I think the question might be best answered by following the money. For a couple generations pot has been a substitute drug for tobacco. Should pot be legal the substitution of pot for tobacco would accelerate as they would now be on equal footing.

Tobacco is grown in the south while Pot is largely grown in the west. To me the illegalization of Pot while tobacco is legal is a clear violation of article IX of the constitution which states that

"No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another ..."

To me the illegalization of pot is a federal violation of the constitution. Pot is a clear substitute for tobacco. The federal government regulates pot in such a manner as to provide preference for those southern states selling tobacco over the western states selling pot.
 
So true. We don't really have a drug problem. It's that the culture is so degenerate that so many people must be high just to get through the day. Although the people killed in accidents where the perpetrator might disagree with how harmless pot is. Pot is a symptom like alcoholism. If all the addictions were added up more than half the population suffers from some kind of depravity.

I have been thinking along these lines, perhaps too much.
Most of the advertising supports values that are not beneficial to society. Reinforced in almost everything offered on TV.

What about that 'little problem'?

I won't wait on the government to solve that problem for me---individual choice is faster. jmo.

A better question might be why is it illegal? Prohibition failed but Pot is still illegal. The libertarians rightly hate it.

I think the question might be best answered by following the money. For a couple generations pot has been a substitute drug for tobacco. Should pot be legal the substitution of pot for tobacco would accelerate as they would now be on equal footing.

Tobacco is grown in the south while Pot is largely grown in the west. To me the illegalization of Pot while tobacco is legal is a clear violation of article IX of the constitution which states that

"No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another ..."

To me the illegalization of pot is a federal violation of the constitution. Pot is a clear substitute for tobacco. The federal government regulates pot in such a manner as to provide preference for those southern states selling tobacco over the western states selling pot.

One area where the pot = tobacco argument has an issue is with impairment. I dont mind some trucker huffing down a pack of marlboro reds when on the interstate, but I would not want to be driving near someone stoned driving the same rig.
 
I have been thinking along these lines, perhaps too much.
Most of the advertising supports values that are not beneficial to society. Reinforced in almost everything offered on TV.

What about that 'little problem'?

I won't wait on the government to solve that problem for me---individual choice is faster. jmo.

A better question might be why is it illegal? Prohibition failed but Pot is still illegal. The libertarians rightly hate it.

I think the question might be best answered by following the money. For a couple generations pot has been a substitute drug for tobacco. Should pot be legal the substitution of pot for tobacco would accelerate as they would now be on equal footing.

Tobacco is grown in the south while Pot is largely grown in the west. To me the illegalization of Pot while tobacco is legal is a clear violation of article IX of the constitution which states that

"No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another ..."

To me the illegalization of pot is a federal violation of the constitution. Pot is a clear substitute for tobacco. The federal government regulates pot in such a manner as to provide preference for those southern states selling tobacco over the western states selling pot.

One area where the pot = tobacco argument has an issue is with impairment. I dont mind some trucker huffing down a pack of marlboro reds when on the interstate, but I would not want to be driving near someone stoned driving the same rig.

Actually as a stimulate cigarettes could make the said truck driver more irritable and aggressive as a driver. The case can easily be made that a truck driver under the influence of marijuana would be a more safe driver than one using Pot. Of course levels of dose would come into play.

But no matter which is safer regulating while operating a vehicle wouldn't affect section IX but the current prohibition seems to be a clear violation. My guess is most criminal defense attorneys slept through their constitutional law classes. Hopefully the State of Colorado will sue the government on these grounds.
 
A better question might be why is it illegal? Prohibition failed but Pot is still illegal. The libertarians rightly hate it.

I think the question might be best answered by following the money. For a couple generations pot has been a substitute drug for tobacco. Should pot be legal the substitution of pot for tobacco would accelerate as they would now be on equal footing.

Tobacco is grown in the south while Pot is largely grown in the west. To me the illegalization of Pot while tobacco is legal is a clear violation of article IX of the constitution which states that

"No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another ..."

To me the illegalization of pot is a federal violation of the constitution. Pot is a clear substitute for tobacco. The federal government regulates pot in such a manner as to provide preference for those southern states selling tobacco over the western states selling pot.

One area where the pot = tobacco argument has an issue is with impairment. I dont mind some trucker huffing down a pack of marlboro reds when on the interstate, but I would not want to be driving near someone stoned driving the same rig.

Actually as a stimulate cigarettes could make the said truck driver more irritable and aggressive as a driver. The case can easily be made that a truck driver under the influence of marijuana would be a more safe driver than one using Pot. Of course levels of dose would come into play.

But no matter which is safer regulating while operating a vehicle wouldn't affect section IX but the current prohibition seems to be a clear violation. My guess is most criminal defense attorneys slept through their constitutional law classes. Hopefully the State of Colorado will sue the government on these grounds.

I would disagree on the tobacco user being more of a danger than a pot user, but I do agree it should be legalized. Legalization, however would need to be tempered by allowing companies to prevent its use by employees in certain occupations.

Alcohol is legal, but get caught with it in your system during a random or after accident test as a truck operator, and your ass is fired. The same should be for pot, but we would have to figure out a test that measured concentration in blood vs. intoxication rather than just evidence of trace amounts.
 
Marijuna definitely makes people safer drivers.

Teenage Driver Indicted in Fatal Car Accident | Verizon FiOS1 News - Long Island

It's all in how you define safe.

Does safe driving mean twice as likely to crash?

Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash cars - HealthPop - CBS News

Marijuana Use May Double the Risk of Accidents for Drivers | News | Mailman School of Public Health

It's the definition of safe driving that needs to be changed so that driving under the influence of marijuana can be statistically safer, if not actually safer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top