Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All that‘s necessary is the appearance of misconduct. And when a D.A. Is having an affair with a man whom she pays hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds, and then she personally benefits from that with trips to Aruba and cruises, it appears that way.
Someone with such poor judgment has no business being a D.A.
She’s caused the DIE movement enough embarrassment as it is. Add in that she put the entire case at risk, and she’s gone baby, gone.
Such a shame, really. Here is a girl who was raised by a racist father*, and as a result was told that any failure she has was due to whitey. And success she had was due to her own brilliance and skill set - despite whitey. The truth of course is that she was advantaged by her color, and got to where she is because of it. We all heard her last week - an ordinary person, very defiant and entitled, unable to speak English properly, and showing very poor judgement.
She really blew it. She believed she got to where she was due to her own brilliance, and now she’s exposed what a DIE and AA candidate is.
*member of the Black Panthers who dated Angela Davis
The appearance of prosecutor misconduct is all you need. But Ray Charles could see what she did.This is much more likely. And again, I've seen the hearings.
Willis will not be removed. There is simply not enough evidence to establish an actual conflict of interest. This will lead to all of you screaming that it's simply more proof that the judicial system has it in for Trump.
Meanwhile. In the real world that judge will have made his decision on the applicable law. And on and on we go.
Made up shit you Canadians made up. Means nothingThat's not the same standard you hold Donald Trump to, or anyone else.
Are you seriously suggesting that that anyone Donald Trump decides to smear with lies and bullshit should be disqualified from ANYTHING, just because Trump lied about them because "appearances matter".
Alas, the brilliant Ray Charles is long dead. But Stevie Wonder could see it.The appearance of prosecutor misconduct is all you need. But Ray Charles could see what she did.
Either one could see it.Alas, the brilliant Ray Charles is long dead. But Stevie Wonder could see it.
The appearance of prosecutor misconduct is all you need. But Ray Charles could see what she did.
Why is it that all of you keep on repeating that bogus claim. Even when it's shown that it simply isn't true?“ In applying these standards, the reversal of a conviction due to such a conflict of interest requires more than a "`theoretical or speculative conflict.'" Lyons v. State. An actual conflict of interest must be involved.” Whitworth v. State, 275 Ga. App. 790, 793 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)
No, you are wrong. That is NOT the standard in Georgia.
Maybe you should read first before you post itWhitworth v. State, 275 Ga. App. 790 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Whitworth v. State, 275 Ga. App. 790, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
Why is it that all of you keep on repeating that bogus claim. Even when it's shown that it simply isn't true?
Let's just assume for the sake of argument that Wade payed for her trips. She denies it he denies it. But let's just assume this isn't true.
What's the conflict? Does it invalidate the charges? How do you get there?
Yes and the ruling was.... a conflict of interest requires more than a "`theoretical or speculative conflict.Maybe you should read first before you post it
Whitworth does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, nor outline any specific harm which he suffered as a result of the actions of which he complains in this prosecution. Rather, he complains primarily of the actions of the Attorney General's office in briefing J. Tom Morgan, the second special prosecutor appointed following the voluntary recusal in this case of the Attorney General and his staff, and the failure of the trial court to disqualify Morgan based on his personal interest in the matter. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.
There is no theoretical conflict. There is actual prosecutorial misconductYes and the ruling was.... a conflict of interest requires more than a "`theoretical or speculative conflict.
You don't need to explain the case. You need to explain why all of a sudden, the standard changes from "more than a theoretical or speculative conflict", to... "well the appearance of a conflict is all that is required?"
Yet, with all your brains, all you did with your life was process paperwork for rich people's kids.She’ll be removed for, at the minimum, for the appearance of misconduct. If she weren’t a member of a Dem protected class, she would also be charged for misuse of campaign funds.
Also, half my brain could rot away, and I’d still be smarter than that DIE, Soros-funded D.A.
She’s caused the DIE movement enough embarrassment as it is. Add in that she put the entire case at risk, and she’s gone baby, gone.
Such a shame, really. Here is a girl who was raised by a racist father*, and as a result was told that any failure she has was due to whitey. And success she had was due to her own brilliance and skill set - despite whitey. The truth of course is that she was advantaged by her color, and got to where she is because of it. We all heard her last week - an ordinary person, very defiant and entitled, unable to speak English properly, and showing very poor judgement.
She really blew it. She believed she got to where she was due to her own brilliance, and now she’s exposed what a DIE and AA candidate is.
*member of the Black Panthers who dated Angela Davis
Damn how racist are youYet, with all your brains, all you did with your life was process paperwork for rich people's kids.
And get upset when they admitted a black kid to keep from getting sued.
Prosecutor misconductSo let me get this straight. Trump cheating on all three of his wives, paying porn stars for sex, and bragging about grabbing women by the pussy is not an embarrassment, but Fani having a consensual relationship with a coworker is.
How is having a relationship "Misconduct".Prosecutor misconduct
That may be the ideal, but the reality is that this case is dead. If they take Willis off the case and reassign it to another country, the presiding district attorney will drop it like a hotel potato.The key point is that regardless of whether the factual circumstances involving Willis and Wade give rise to separate ethical concerns with respect to his hiring, such questions do not affect the propriety of the prosecution against Roman and his co-defendants. Questions about gifts and related matters go to Willis’s and Wade’s obligations to the Fulton County District Attorney’s office, and have no connection to assuring the defendants a fair trial. These allegations are as irrelevant to the trial as allegations in other situations that prosecutors took office supplies for personal use, drove county vehicles for personal errands, or plagiarized portions of their student law review notes. All of those are legitimate issues—for prosecutors’ offices and those with oversight responsibilities to address—but such allegations do not bring criminal prosecutions to a stop or require that cases be transferred to a different office. Defense attorneys cannot use allegations of prosecutorial ethics violations, real or imaginary, that have nothing to do with a trial to delay or force prosecutors off of a case.
As a matter of both common sense and Georgia law, a prosecutor is disqualified from a case due to a “conflict of interest” only when the prosecutor’s conflicting loyalties could prejudice the defendant leading, for example, to an improper conviction. None of the factual allegations made in the Roman motion have a basis in law for the idea that such prejudice could exist here – as it might where a law enforcement agent is involved with a witness, or a defense lawyer with a judge. We might question Willis’s judgment in hiring Wade and the pair’s other alleged conduct, but under Georgia law that relationship and their alleged behavior do not impact her or his ability to continue on the case.
Why Fani Willis Is Not Disqualified Under Georgia Law
Analysis of Georgia law on disqualifying prosecutors in light of allegations against DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade.www.justsecurity.org
She did not ruin the case.
She's his boss, dumbass. Having sex with subordinates is misconduct in many corporations and almost all government offices.How is having a relationship "Misconduct".
They were both consenting adults, and his contract was approved by the county board after two other lawyers begged off due to not wanting to have their families murdered by MAGAts.
She committed perjury in front of a judge.She lied on legal documents. She is charging people in this case for lying on legal documents. How can you not see the issue with this?
Wtf!She’ll be removed for, at the minimum, for the appearance of misconduct. If she weren’t a member of a Dem protected class, she would also be charged for misuse of campaign funds.
Also, half my brain could rot away, and I’d still be smarter than that DIE, Soros-funded D.A.
