Left wingers...regarding Orlando tragedy....you have a tough choice to make

[bripat9643]

No one sides with terrorists.

Leftwingers do.

Garbage.
Appalachia hid Eric Rudolph for years.

Those are the facts, back to the spin

Whenever some scumbag jihadists slaughters Americans, douche bags like you start blaming it on a lack of gun control and that we shouldn't blame it on Islam.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You're correct...didn't read it.

We know stats from other nations.... Fewer guns always equal fewer gun crimes.

Those are the facts, now back to the spin.

Nope, not at all. In fact in most cases, gun control did very little (in the long run) for gun crimes and other crimes increased.

 

[Norman]

No one sides with terrorists.

Leftwingers do.

Garbage.
Appalachia hid Eric Rudolph for years.

Those are the facts, back to the spin

Whenever some scumbag jihadists slaughters Americans, douche bags like you start blaming it on a lack of gun control and that we shouldn't blame it on Islam.

True, but this mad-man wasn't only a muslim. He was also a registered democrat. So, of course the libs couldn't blame him! Those evil guns and the NRA made him do it! It's the evil white republicans at it again!

Orlando Shooting Suspect Identified As Omar Mateen, Registered Democrat Of Afghan Descent; Pledged Allegiance To ISIS | Zero Hedge

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I'm sure he does. Fewer bloodbaths is preferable to more bloodbaths

The problem is people think they can control bloodbaths by taking away guns.

 

[Tilly]

In some of those cases, you're not wrong, however, the terrorists are consistently Islamic Extremists, and they're out to kill anyone that isn't. The government refuses to acknowledge that a group of Islamic Extremists are the threat we're facing.

Actually, it was a no gun zone, if I heard correctly. These people should have been able to defend themselves.

I agree with the last part. But terrorists are not always responsible for these mass murders. We've had plenty of non-terrorist mass murders too.

He was a kook because (at least what we know now) he wasn't raised that way. He was born here and a citizen. It seems to me he went out looking to join up with terrorists (kook) and not the other way around. He was the one looking to be a troublemaker.

His father is a fan of the Taliban. He didn't have to look too far.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What would have happened if the trigger man couldn't get guns, and was relegated to using knives?
#prayforaworkingbraincuzyouneedone

I guess the same thing dope addicts did when they couldn't get dope. They found a way.

 

[Norman]

You're correct...didn't read it.

We know stats from other nations.... Fewer guns always equal fewer gun crimes.

Those are the facts, now back to the spin.

Nope, not at all. In fact in most cases, gun control did very little (in the long run) for gun crimes and other crimes increased.

WRONG. More guns = less homicides..

However, muslims or black people = more homicides.

Just take the liberal religion and believe the opposite of what it says, and you will more often than not arrive at the facts.

 

[candycorn]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

 

[mudwhistle]

Me thinks the left threw the gays under the bus after reading the comments

Where did you see this?

All over the forum. I will never understand you on the left's defense of Islam and what it is truly about. The sad fact is these people you don't dare to offend would slit your throat just as soon as they would mine...we are all infidels to them

They only support Islam because their current leadership supports it.
They follow their lead.
The people they placed in power are responsible for all of this. Political-Correctness in this country helped create this mass-shooting. This guy was under investigation for years by the FBI, but they ended the investigation because the only way they will do anything about him is if he actually murders someone, but by then it's always too late. Cops aren't allowed enough leeway to act on hunches because of our legal system that protects the rights of thugs more than their victims. Our president constantly makes excuses for them. Blames the tools of their murderous acts rather than the perverted religion that breeds millions of these sick fucks.

 

[candycorn]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

Other nations have very strict gun laws and their citizenry is largely gun free
They do not have the number of bloodbaths we have

 

[DigitalDrifter]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

Other nations have very strict gun laws and their citizenry is largely gun free
They do not have the number of bloodbaths we have

A Muslim as crazed as this guy would have simply came up with another method if he could not obtain a firearm.

 

[candycorn]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

Other nations have very strict gun laws and their citizenry is largely gun free
They do not have the number of bloodbaths we have

A Muslim as crazed as this guy would have simply came up with another method if he could not obtain a firearm.

possibly.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support Islam....Ideology whose main purpose is to kill as many gay people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO regressive ideology should be criticized so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from oppressive white males......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "Tolerant") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the acceptance of such ideology.

That is not the ideology of Islam any more than killing abortion doctors is the ideology of Christianity.

 

[NYcarbineer]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

Other nations have very strict gun laws and their citizenry is largely gun free
They do not have the number of bloodbaths we have

A Muslim as crazed as this guy would have simply came up with another method if he could not obtain a firearm.

And drunks will drive drunk despite the law. That's not a case for making drunk driving legal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They seem to be siding with Muslims over gays.

I realize it's a Sophie's choice kinda thing for them, but I think they're taking the low road.

I side with the innocent people that were slaughtered because of someones hatred driven by extremist bs.

In this case, worst massacre ever in US history and commited in the name of Jihad.

Then, there's this....

"Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program hasled to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Obama said he'd side with Muslims.

The left will always side with Islam.

I'll never side with extremist that commit such mindless violence. I will of course side with common sense that allows for America to keep leading in infrastructure, science, r&d and education! To be against such is also mindless idiocy.

Don't you ever tire of posting this endless drivel? Your own lack of knowledge handcuffs your pathetic attempts at reasoning.

I have college degrees, while all you have is hatred of the basic functions of government. Please learn something about the subject.

You should sue those colleges for failure to do their job and filling your head with useless garbage and failing to teach you how to think. All you do is repeat the same old tired posts without any clue as why those are not functions of the federal government. Maybe if you had a teacher like me, you might have learned something.

 

[Norman]

if more guns made the nations safer, we’d have, by far, the safest nation on earth.
Instead, we have the highest gun crime rate of any advanced society.

If having less guns made us safer, then we would have been the safest during the assault weapons ban a couple of years ago. But as most of us know, it produced no results. If having less guns made us safer, gun-free zones would be the safest place to be instead of the most dangerous. If you think having less guns make you safe, then get a huge sign made for your front porch. The sign should read WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOME and let us know how it works out for you in a couple of months.........if you are still here with us.

Other nations have very strict gun laws and their citizenry is largely gun free
They do not have the number of bloodbaths we have

Wrong.. more guns = less homicides:

(In Swizerland everyone has an assault rifle as part of military service... and look at where it falls).

The reason Europe doesn't have as many homicides, is that there are not as many blacks owned by the democrat plantation, who commit almost 10x as many homicides as the whites.

 

[candycorn]

Sad that some have to invoke racism.
Switzerland is the textbook example of a well-regulated militia. Are you willing to enact the exact same rules Switzerland has on US citizens?

 

[Norman]

Sad that some have to invoke racism.
Switzerland is the textbook example of a well-regulated militia. Are you willing to enact the exact same rules Switzerland has on US citizens?

If admitting facts is racism, then everyone better be racist.


My point was that Swizerland has assault rifles... a lot of them. What they lack is muslims, they were smart enough not to participate in the European migration(destruction) programs.