Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
gee----I never gave it much thought-----do bill and hellary LIVE
together-----uhm <blushing> .......same bedroom? ------
---twin beds or-----a queen sized rig??----BUNK BEDS??
Let's start with this: Obama hates Hillary.
Obama's reason for living is his insatiable arrogance and narcissism. He believes he's smarter, more insightful and better qualified than any underling or any prior president. Which is why he's surrounded by ass kissing sycophants like Valerie Jarrett. No one, not Michelle, not Uncle Joe, not Hillary, not even the dignity of the Office of the President is more important than the chain-to-his-wrist, "guard this with your life" priority of his legacy. Uber alles.
Obama hates Hillary with a hard blue flame. He held he beneath contempt during the 2008 primary, and bought her off, as is common among the Chicago organized crime circle, with those you wish to keep under your thumb until such time as, etc.
He hated her throughout her term as Sec Of State, as witnessed by his damning with faint praise throughout, and his documented (thus far) attempts to marginalize her Neocon warmongering influence, witness Libya, Afghanistan, Russia/Crimea/Ukraine, and Syria. And ISIS.
He hates her now, for being such a senile ditz over her handling of documents critical to the national security including tens of his own emails, let's not forget, which were announced to be in there by the State Department, because they had to explain the presidential privilege reason for not releasing them.
For the third time in this post, Obama hates Hillary, she threatens his legacy, and she puts him in actual legal jeopardy himself.
Only thing I don't get is why he endorsed her.
Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
And there is the constant value of Clinton's inherent sleaziness to considerI'm not convinced they don't have something to hide are you?why do you ask stupid questions
Really? Why couldn't Bill just call her? Maybe because they worried about wire taps? They know the plane is safe?
yes---they could worry about wire-tap
So you are convinced they did have something to hide?
I don't think that Lynch and Billy are good friends.
I don't think that Bill just stopped so Lynch could serve them coffee.
I do think that they met on the plane because then everything could be controlled.
When people act like Clinton and Lynch did, then yeah I think they have something to hide.
Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
Just kidding...
Let me guess - this 'professor' was Obama.
It was explained yesterday that such an act by ANY state Prosecuting Attorney or Attorney General is not only unethical but is ILLEGAL. Lynch herself recognized, at least, the 'perceived impropriety' - her way of explaining what she did - and 'apologized'.
Interestingly enough, such behavior by Lynch is EXACLY why a judge recently ordered ALL DOJ lawyers to attend ETHICS TRAINING.
Let me guess - this 'professor' was Obama.
It was explained yesterday that such an act by ANY state Prosecuting Attorney or Attorney General is not only unethical but is ILLEGAL. Lynch herself recognized, at least, the 'perceived impropriety' - her way of explaining what she did - and 'apologized'.
Interestingly enough, such behavior by Lynch is EXACLY why a judge recently ordered ALL DOJ lawyers to attend ETHICS TRAINING.
I think that in many cases ethics training is like teaching a car mechanic how to perform brain surgery.
All that shows is that left wingers have no principles. They will say anything, no matter how absurd and obviously wrong, to further their agenda. This "law professor" is nothing more than a partisan hack.Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
Only goes to show that Hilarybots don't stand for anything. They don't care if their candidate is a criminal or not.Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
It should be obvious to even to most rabid, dull witted Hilarybots that the meeting between the Attorney General and the former President was, at the very least, clearly improper and reeks of corruption and influence.Are you a Law Professor?Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
I call Bullshit. It is completely inappropriate for her to meet privately with the husband of a person who is the subject of an FBI investigation. There is an overwhelming appearance of impropriety in this case. Don't believe me? If this were a Republican ex POTUS meeting with a US attorney who served under him while his wife was under investigation it would be front page news, and every Dem on the planet would be demanding her resignation.
As if this forum is important enough to garner that kind of attention.^ Another paid- DNC posterRegarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
you'd be surprised at how far the powers that be would go to keep the sheeple in their slumber. Owning govt's is a lucrative businessAs if this forum is important enough to garner that kind of attention.^ Another paid- DNC posterRegarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
You're right, I wouldn't be surprised. I just think the Hilarybots would be more likely to focus their efforts where they can have the most effect.....Youtube and social media sites for example.you'd be surprised at how far the powers that be would go to keep the sheeple in their slumber. Owning govt's is a lucrative businessAs if this forum is important enough to garner that kind of attention.^ Another paid- DNC posterRegarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
It should be obvious to even to most rabid, dull witted Hilarybots that the meeting between the Attorney General and the former President was, at the very least, clearly improper and reeks of corruption and influence.Are you a Law Professor?Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
I call Bullshit. It is completely inappropriate for her to meet privately with the husband of a person who is the subject of an FBI investigation. There is an overwhelming appearance of impropriety in this case. Don't believe me? If this were a Republican ex POTUS meeting with a US attorney who served under him while his wife was under investigation it would be front page news, and every Dem on the planet would be demanding her resignation.
It should be obvious to even to most rabid, dull witted Hilarybots that the meeting between the Attorney General and the former President was, at the very least, clearly improper and reeks of corruption and influence.Are you a Law Professor?Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
I call Bullshit. It is completely inappropriate for her to meet privately with the husband of a person who is the subject of an FBI investigation. There is an overwhelming appearance of impropriety in this case. Don't believe me? If this were a Republican ex POTUS meeting with a US attorney who served under him while his wife was under investigation it would be front page news, and every Dem on the planet would be demanding her resignation.
I think old Slick probably told Lynch what is going to happen to her if she makes the wrong move and then Hillary gets elected. You can be Lynch needed some new underpants after that meeting.
