Kavanaugh/Ford Opinion Thread Merge -- Tuesday Sept 25th 2018

Are Establishment GOP Operatives Throwing The Kavanaugh SCOTUS Nomination?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 18.8%
  • No

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • I am undecided, but they are turning this in to a circus.

    Votes: 13 40.6%

  • Total voters
    32
This just in, Hamilton Burger has decided to press charges on Kav. Della street has indicated Perry Mason may represent Kav, saying that Lt. Tragg has no credibility. Paul Drake is currently getting yearbooks and having them analyzed. They are calling it the case of the washed up ho.
 
`
The lawyer also told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that “at least one” new accuser of the Supreme Court nominee will come forward within the next 48 hours. - Attorney Michael Avenatti has issued a stark warning to those attempting to discredit a new accuser of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

On Monday night, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that the woman was “both” a witness and a victim of Kavanaugh’s who “had a number of security clearances issued by the federal government over a number of years.” He also claims she will publicly come forward within 48 hours.

“So let this be a warning to Donald Trump, Brett Kavanaugh and other surrogates on the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Avenatti said. “Be very, very careful if you launch some smear campaign against my client because you will ultimately be shown to be a fraud.” - Source
`
`

Maybe I'm reading this wrong but is he talking about a third accuser?

The discredited creepy porn lawyer said what?


he said he want st be laughed at some more
 
My question is why doesn't Ford want to face the man she's accusing of groping her 36 years ago at a party she can't remember??

Hell I'd face him if it were me. But then I would have reported it 36 years ago.

This whole thing is a he said. She said. No proof and no one remembers anything and it stinks to high heaven.

If I were Grassly I'd forget this whole mess and get the vote going at get Kav on the SC post haste.

Really would you of?

You goddamned right I would have.

So you were never assaulted and we do not know if you would of reported it or not, do we?
 
McConnell needs to shut his fucking bullshit mouth! After what he did to Merrick Garland, he's in no position to be lecturing anyone about SCOTUS nominees.
I see another ABNORMAL who doesn't know history posting....here inbreedi know why Garland never made it

Joe Biden Argued for Delaying Supreme Court Picks in 1992!

As a senator more than two decades ago, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. argued that President George Bush should delay filling a Supreme Court vacancy, should one arise, until the presidential election was over, and that it was “essential” that the Senate refuse to confirm a nominee to the court until then.



Mr. Biden’s words, though uttered long ago, are a direct contradiction to President Obama’s position in the battle over naming a successor to Justice Antonin Scalia.



Mr. Obama has said it is his constitutional responsibility to name a successor to Justice Scalia, who died Feb. 13 at the age of 79. The president has reacted with incredulity to the suggestion by several Republican presidential candidates and senators, including Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, that the decision should wait until after Mr. Obama has left office.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...

 
`
The lawyer also told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that “at least one” new accuser of the Supreme Court nominee will come forward within the next 48 hours. - Attorney Michael Avenatti has issued a stark warning to those attempting to discredit a new accuser of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

On Monday night, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that the woman was “both” a witness and a victim of Kavanaugh’s who “had a number of security clearances issued by the federal government over a number of years.” He also claims she will publicly come forward within 48 hours.

“So let this be a warning to Donald Trump, Brett Kavanaugh and other surrogates on the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Avenatti said. “Be very, very careful if you launch some smear campaign against my client because you will ultimately be shown to be a fraud.” - Source
`
`

Maybe I'm reading this wrong but is he talking about a third accuser?
/----/ Fake accusers are like liberal women - a dime a dozen.
iu
 
Avenatti is an ambulance chaser with zero creds

Well he sure has been credible.

When? You've become extremely annoying. You just take the quack's side on any issue and facts or lack of be damned

You're like the forum Avenattii. A clown

Thank you, I only exist to annoy you cult followers.
You don't annoy, you amuse.

She's hilarious on religion threads, doesn't have the first clue but think she's an expert

Pretty much same with Kavanaugh no proof of anyting but because she has to toe the party line he's guilty.

Stupid as a stump and easily led
 
My question is why doesn't Ford want to face the man she's accusing of groping her 36 years ago at a party she can't remember??

Hell I'd face him if it were me. But then I would have reported it 36 years ago.

This whole thing is a he said. She said. No proof and no one remembers anything and it stinks to high heaven.

If I were Grassly I'd forget this whole mess and get the vote going at get Kav on the SC post haste.

Really would you of?

You goddamned right I would have.

So you were never assaulted and we do not know if you would of reported it or not, do we?

Nope. I've never been assaulted but at fifteen I sure wouldn't have been at that party either.

You can also bet your ass if I had been assaulted I would have reported it to my parents. They would have reported it to the police if my Dad didn't go looking for the assaulter.

Nope. Ford is full of shit or she has her own agenda.
 
Being a virgin doesn't make him a loser...but it also doesn't make him innocent of the accusations.

Ummmm, yes it probably does.

But why quibble

Not even remotely. Just because he wasn't a successful rapist doesn't mean he didn't try when the opportunity presented itself or when he was grossly intoxicated (as it is rumored he had a tendency to become).
 
You have to love crazy people they always have to take out their stupid and show it off like a bright penny.

No link, four people other then Kavanaugh have said it never happened. One of the neigh Sayers was a freind of the accussor. Even has written journals that may show it did not happen. One of the girls that went to drunk and loose high with her claimed she had heard rumors all over school about it until someone pointed out nothing had been said until 2012.

Now you come along with the idea that you must be a loser if you have not had dozens of sexual encounters by the time you are in high school. The funny thing is you are doing it with no information, while using a pornstars ID. That ranks beyond crazy or stupid.
 
Do Leftists believe Kavanaugh should go to prison? Or are they only concerned about the SC and if Kavanaughs nomination is rescinded they ll forget all about Crazy Ford?
 
McConnell needs to shut his fucking bullshit mouth! After what he did to Merrick Garland, he's in no position to be lecturing anyone about SCOTUS nominees.

You should be proud that he followed your rules to the letter.

That is true. Reid did this to Romney about taxes. False allegation. When asked he shrugged and said “he lost right?”

Dirty politics
 
  1. Confirm Kavanaugh
  2. Prosecute Ford
  3. Expel Feinstein
  4. Raid the creepy porn lawyer, seize his cellphone and emails, he's part of a criminal enterprise
1. Ok, do it.
2. For what?
3. For what?
4. For what?
1. Agree
2. Fraud
3. Ethics
4. Again, fraud.

Actually, change 2 and 4 to Conspiracy. If it is good enough for the Russians, its good enough for those two.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top