CDZ Kavanaugh Documents Released Late, How Big A Deal?

[Sunsettommy]

Uh oh, looks like Kavanaugh may have lied to congress. And he was under oath.

Did Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh lie to Congress?

Did Brett Kavanaugh Mislead the Senate About Detainees?

Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh caught lying under oath during Senate testimony
------------------------------------

Come on, does it matter? He's a Republicans. They have no morals. They lie all the time.

If they didn't lie, would they even be a REAL Republican?

Clinton lied over a BJ and Republicans freaked.

Not because Clinton lied, but because only Republicans are allowed to tell lies to congress and the American people. Everyone knows that.

"Then in 2007, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin learned that Kavanaugh had lied during those hearings. He sought to get answers, but Kavanaugh stonewalled him. Now that Trump has put Kavanaugh under the microscope by nominating him for the Supreme Court, Durbin is going for the jugular."

This means that ELEVEN YEARS AGO Dick Durban believes Kavanaugh lied under oath, but never moved for impeachment or other available legal means to expose his alleged lie.

Since he didn't do anything for 11 years, he can't do anything now, he is just grandstanding as the meathead he is.

 

[Toronado3800]

Uh oh, looks like Kavanaugh may have lied to congress. And he was under oath.

Did Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh lie to Congress?

Did Brett Kavanaugh Mislead the Senate About Detainees?

Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh caught lying under oath during Senate testimony
------------------------------------

Come on, does it matter? He's a Republicans. They have no morals. They lie all the time.

If they didn't lie, would they even be a REAL Republican?

Clinton lied over a BJ and Republicans freaked.

Not because Clinton lied, but because only Republicans are allowed to tell lies to congress and the American people. Everyone knows that.

"Then in 2007, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin learned that Kavanaugh had lied during those hearings. He sought to get answers, but Kavanaugh stonewalled him. Now that Trump has put Kavanaugh under the microscope by nominating him for the Supreme Court, Durbin is going for the jugular."

This means that ELEVEN YEARS AGO Dick Durban believes Kavanaugh lied under oath, but never moved for impeachment or other available legal means to expose his alleged lie.

Since he didn't do anything for 11 years, he can't do anything now, he is just grandstanding as the meathead he is.

Ey, maybe reword that. It sounds as if you are siding with the liar for the sake of supporting your team instead of the man who was picking and chosing his battles.

That said, now its been a few days since the docs were released and I'm not totally blown away

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Kavanaugh confirmation is not 'normal,' Klobuchar says, claiming too many documents withheld

Hours before Kavanaugh nomination hearings, Bush lawyer releases 42,000 pages of documents to Judiciary Committee

I suppose this is always going to happen and my theory is Kavanaugh is not the worst of fellows Trump could have nominated.

So, if I were a senator in exchange for voting for Kavanaugh I'd demand some rule where senators had to vote on proposed justices before taking any vacation or off time or whatever to prevent that joke we saw last year. Thank goodness we're not waiting 3 or 7 years to get a vote on Kavanaugh lol.

But yeah, what's the take on the document situation? Business as normal? I just don't recall it coming up before.

90% of his past has not been submitted.

If his record is so exemplary, why are those documents being witheld?

In the hearing today, Senator Richard Durbin exposed that Kavanaugh lied under oath during his DC circuit confirmation.

The only joke are these confirmation hearings.

Unless you were speaking of the joke of Mitch McConnell not allowing an August recess to give Democrats no time to go home to campaign ahead of the elections.

There are indeed many jokes in this whole sordid affair.

All of them have (R)'s next to their names.

Fortunately, most of these jokes are over the age of 55, and will be replaced with younger, browner, and more Liberal replacements over the next 30 years that will wipe out the history of conservatism from the end of World War 2 up until that time.

And because the Congress and state legislatures and governorships that will be held by those younger, browner, and more Liberal replacements, are the Constitutional check and balance on the judiciary, all of this will become moot anyway.

They've provided five times the documentation of any other SCJ in history.

 

[sartre play]

Who said they provided 5 times the documentation?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Who said they provided 5 times the documentation?

Chuck Grassely.
****** liberals....always so ill informed.
Maybe more CSPAN and less Sesame Street.....

Senate digs through record 1 million pages of documents on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh

FACT CHECK: Are There More Records On Kavanaugh Than The Last Five SCOTUS Justices Combined?

 

[flacaltenn]

This kind of "current event" politically charged discussion just shouldn't be in the CDZ. Time to bring it into a Civil Discussion is once the boiling passions are over.

It was maybe OK when it was put here on the 3rd Sept or so. But since then we have 30 threads with full partisan conflict on the topic. Don't want it leaking to the CDZ..

Closed.