Karl Rove Attacking Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren is a champion of the poor and middle class. Therefore, 99%ers should love her and 1%ers should hate her. It's as simple as that...

Elizabeth Warren is a rich 1%er. It's as simple as that.

The richest people in the USA are DEMOCRATS.

The richest Congressmen are DEMOCRATS.

DEMOCRAT Obama raked in the most money ever from Wallstreet Bankers.

The DEMOCRATS always have their hands in others pockets enriching themselves.

Case in point: The richest US senator & ex-presidential candidate is John Kerry. Kerry & his wife are the richest because their wealth comes from their Heinz foods company. Heinz foods company makes them rich by overcharging for the food they sell to people on government food programs such as school lunch, food-stamps, SNAP, EBT, etc. John Kerry & his cronies always make sure these government food programs are well funded with your tax dollars under the guise of "helping to feed the poor". If he wanted to help the poor he would lower their food prices instead of "fleecing the poor" & the tax payers to amass his record profits with his high price Heinz foods.

ANY TIME A DEMOCRAT SAYS I'M HERE TO HELP - GRAB YOUR WALLET!!!
 
Elizabeth Warren is a champion of the poor and middle class. Therefore, 99%ers should love her and 1%ers should hate her. It's as simple as that...

Elizabeth Warren is a rich 1%er. It's as simple as that.

The richest people in the USA are DEMOCRATS.

The richest Congressmen are DEMOCRATS.

DEMOCRAT Obama raked in the most money ever from Wallstreet Bankers.

The DEMOCRATS always have their hands in others pockets enriching themselves.

Case in point: The richest US senator & ex-presidential candidate is John Kerry. Kerry & his wife are the richest because their wealth comes from their Heinz foods company. Heinz foods company makes them rich by overcharging for the food they sell to people on government food programs such as school lunch, food-stamps, SNAP, EBT, etc. John Kerry & his cronies always make sure these government food programs are well funded with your tax dollars under the guise of "helping to feed the poor". If he wanted to help the poor he would lower their food prices instead of "fleecing the poor" & the tax payers to amass his record profits with his high price Heinz foods.

ANY TIME A DEMOCRAT SAYS I'M HERE TO HELP - GRAB YOUR WALLET!!!

You should engage your brain before your mouth.

The 50 Richest Members of Congress — 112th : Roll Call
 
Elizabeth Warren is a champion of the poor and middle class. Therefore, 99%ers should love her and 1%ers should hate her. It's as simple as that...

Elizabeth Warren is a rich 1%er. It's as simple as that.

The richest people in the USA are DEMOCRATS.

The richest Congressmen are DEMOCRATS.

DEMOCRAT Obama raked in the most money ever from Wallstreet Bankers.

The DEMOCRATS always have their hands in others pockets enriching themselves.

Case in point: The richest US senator & ex-presidential candidate is John Kerry. Kerry & his wife are the richest because their wealth comes from their Heinz foods company. Heinz foods company makes them rich by overcharging for the food they sell to people on government food programs such as school lunch, food-stamps, SNAP, EBT, etc. John Kerry & his cronies always make sure these government food programs are well funded with your tax dollars under the guise of "helping to feed the poor". If he wanted to help the poor he would lower their food prices instead of "fleecing the poor" & the tax payers to amass his record profits with his high price Heinz foods.

ANY TIME A DEMOCRAT SAYS I'M HERE TO HELP - GRAB YOUR WALLET!!!

You should engage your brain before your mouth.

The 50 Richest Members of Congress — 112th : Roll Call
You should learn to fuckin' read, Tonto.........He was talking about senators, of whom have the majority.

Christ, those reservation educations sure do suck, as you so constantly prove.
 
I can only figure someone must like getting spanked on these threads because it happens to him a great deal.

A judgment that someone has been "spanked" is never legitimate unless it comes from someone who agrees with him. Otherwise, it's just evidence of childishness and irrelevance on the part of the one making the judgment.
 
Elizabeth Warren is a champion of the poor and middle class. Therefore, 99%ers should love her and 1%ers should hate her. It's as simple as that...

Elizabeth Warren is a rich 1%er. It's as simple as that.

The richest people in the USA are DEMOCRATS.

The richest Congressmen are DEMOCRATS.

DEMOCRAT Obama raked in the most money ever from Wallstreet Bankers.

The DEMOCRATS always have their hands in others pockets enriching themselves.

Case in point: The richest US senator & ex-presidential candidate is John Kerry. Kerry & his wife are the richest because their wealth comes from their Heinz foods company. Heinz foods company makes them rich by overcharging for the food they sell to people on government food programs such as school lunch, food-stamps, SNAP, EBT, etc. John Kerry & his cronies always make sure these government food programs are well funded with your tax dollars under the guise of "helping to feed the poor". If he wanted to help the poor he would lower their food prices instead of "fleecing the poor" & the tax payers to amass his record profits with his high price Heinz foods.

ANY TIME A DEMOCRAT SAYS I'M HERE TO HELP - GRAB YOUR WALLET!!!

You should engage your brain before your mouth.

The 50 Richest Members of Congress — 112th : Roll Call

My data was a bit older that had Kerry as the richest & 8 of the top 10 richest were democrat congressmen. Your recent info still has 7 of the top 10 richest are still democrat congressmen. Republican McCaul jumped to the top because his wife inherited a huge fortune & Issa finally passed Kerry. Did democrat Jon Corzine feel your pain?
 
Last edited:
Consumer protection is such a bad thing. It might hurt corporations who Republicans insist are "real" people.

You idiots don't have a clue. Consumer protection would have done absolutly nothing to prevent the subprime mortgage disaster. What are they going to protect the poor from? Banks giving a bunch of rich peoples money to poor people who really did not deserve it? The poor had nothing to lose. The savers lost the most.

The savers, investors, pensions & rich were the ones who were scammed. The reason people did not go to jail is because Clinton signed the bills into law that made this Robin-hood scam perfectly legal. Wallstreet collected fees for throwing investors savings at the poor & stupid. The democrats are trying to act like the poor & stupid were the ones scammed by screaming that we need another worthless costly agency staffed by their crony buddies to protect them.

They had their buddies at the SEC watching porn instead of protecting the investors. This is why the democrats did not jail anyone since they have been in power. Both parties caused this scam & nearly all of Congress, the President & their Wallstreet donor friends benefited from it.

The reason subprime borrowers have bad credit is because they are takers always willing to take money from lenders regardless of the contract terms & never willing to pay it back. The lenders are the ones who needed the protection from these greedy poor stupid assholes. This is why regulators since the "Great Depression" made Wallstreet operate as fiduciaries with the investors/lenders savings until Bill Clinton unceremoniously quietly removed those regulations with the stroke of his pen. Most of the hard working investors, savers with pension funds & 401Ks did not even realize their protections had been removed until it was to late.

The bad credit takers were jumping for joy to sign papers giving loan originators huge fees for giving them huge piles of cash. Consequences, rates, fees & terms do not matter to subprime borrowers. They are always willing to take, take, take & never willing to give back. This is why banks assigned people credit scores to protect the lenders from the greedy takers.

Why else do you think Bill Clinton chose to put his office in Harlem when he left office? He knew all this money would flow there & other inner cities loaded with subprime borrowers. He figured this would be his crowning achievement in the eyes of the poor communities.

Still waiting on rdean to enlighten us on how Elizabeth Warren & her Consumer Protection Agency would have protected us form the subprime mortgage disaster.
 
Consumer protection is such a bad thing. It might hurt corporations who Republicans insist are "real" people.

You idiots don't have a clue. Consumer protection would have done absolutly nothing to prevent the subprime mortgage disaster. What are they going to protect the poor from? Banks giving a bunch of rich peoples money to poor people who really did not deserve it? The poor had nothing to lose. The savers lost the most.

The savers, investors, pensions & rich were the ones who were scammed. The reason people did not go to jail is because Clinton signed the bills into law that made this Robin-hood scam perfectly legal. Wallstreet collected fees for throwing investors savings at the poor & stupid. The democrats are trying to act like the poor & stupid were the ones scammed by screaming that we need another worthless costly agency staffed by their crony buddies to protect them.

They had their buddies at the SEC watching porn instead of protecting the investors. This is why the democrats did not jail anyone since they have been in power. Both parties caused this scam & nearly all of Congress, the President & their Wallstreet donor friends benefited from it.

The reason subprime borrowers have bad credit is because they are takers always willing to take money from lenders regardless of the contract terms & never willing to pay it back. The lenders are the ones who needed the protection from these greedy poor stupid assholes. This is why regulators since the "Great Depression" made Wallstreet operate as fiduciaries with the investors/lenders savings until Bill Clinton unceremoniously quietly removed those regulations with the stroke of his pen. Most of the hard working investors, savers with pension funds & 401Ks did not even realize their protections had been removed until it was to late.

The bad credit takers were jumping for joy to sign papers giving loan originators huge fees for giving them huge piles of cash. Consequences, rates, fees & terms do not matter to subprime borrowers. They are always willing to take, take, take & never willing to give back. This is why banks assigned people credit scores to protect the lenders from the greedy takers.

Why else do you think Bill Clinton chose to put his office in Harlem when he left office? He knew all this money would flow there & other inner cities loaded with subprime borrowers. He figured this would be his crowning achievement in the eyes of the poor communities.

Still waiting on rdean to enlighten us on how Elizabeth Warren & her Consumer Protection Agency would have protected us form the subprime mortgage disaster.
LMAO!

As Bawney Frank so elegantly stated, everything was just fine with Fannie and Freddie. Nooooooo problems whatsoever IT'S AAAALLLLLLLLLLLLL GOOD!

Fuckin' douchebag son of a bitch!:evil:
 
Last edited:
The Marxist wench deserves it. She is however more vocal of her Marxism than Obama is. Obama just lies to the American people about his beliefs that are the very same.

Son of Liberty = Patriot?
Patriot = Son of Liberty?
Are you sure?:eusa_whistle:
 
You idiots don't have a clue. Consumer protection would have done absolutly nothing to prevent the subprime mortgage disaster. What are they going to protect the poor from? Banks giving a bunch of rich peoples money to poor people who really did not deserve it? The poor had nothing to lose. The savers lost the most.

The savers, investors, pensions & rich were the ones who were scammed. The reason people did not go to jail is because Clinton signed the bills into law that made this Robin-hood scam perfectly legal. Wallstreet collected fees for throwing investors savings at the poor & stupid. The democrats are trying to act like the poor & stupid were the ones scammed by screaming that we need another worthless costly agency staffed by their crony buddies to protect them.

They had their buddies at the SEC watching porn instead of protecting the investors. This is why the democrats did not jail anyone since they have been in power. Both parties caused this scam & nearly all of Congress, the President & their Wallstreet donor friends benefited from it.

The reason subprime borrowers have bad credit is because they are takers always willing to take money from lenders regardless of the contract terms & never willing to pay it back. The lenders are the ones who needed the protection from these greedy poor stupid assholes. This is why regulators since the "Great Depression" made Wallstreet operate as fiduciaries with the investors/lenders savings until Bill Clinton unceremoniously quietly removed those regulations with the stroke of his pen. Most of the hard working investors, savers with pension funds & 401Ks did not even realize their protections had been removed until it was to late.

The bad credit takers were jumping for joy to sign papers giving loan originators huge fees for giving them huge piles of cash. Consequences, rates, fees & terms do not matter to subprime borrowers. They are always willing to take, take, take & never willing to give back. This is why banks assigned people credit scores to protect the lenders from the greedy takers.

Why else do you think Bill Clinton chose to put his office in Harlem when he left office? He knew all this money would flow there & other inner cities loaded with subprime borrowers. He figured this would be his crowning achievement in the eyes of the poor communities.

Still waiting on rdean to enlighten us on how Elizabeth Warren & her Consumer Protection Agency would have protected us form the subprime mortgage disaster.
LMAO!

As Bawney Frank so elegantly stated, everything was just fine with Fannie and Freddie. Nooooooo problems whatsoever IT'S AAAALLLLLLLLLLLLL GOOD!

Fuckin' douchebag son of a bitch!:evil:
Fannie is asking for another bailout, too.

"Only" $7.8 billion this time.
 
Still waiting on rdean to enlighten us on how Elizabeth Warren & her Consumer Protection Agency would have protected us form the subprime mortgage disaster.
LMAO!

As Bawney Frank so elegantly stated, everything was just fine with Fannie and Freddie. Nooooooo problems whatsoever IT'S AAAALLLLLLLLLLLLL GOOD!

Fuckin' douchebag son of a bitch!:evil:
Fannie is asking for another bailout, too.

"Only" $7.8 billion this time.
The question is, how much of that big ol' chunk o' money is going to go to lining Fwank's, Dodd's, Obama's, and many other democrats pockets?:eusa_whistle:
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE_wj6NHdEQ&feature=player_embedded]First Ad: "Who I Am" - YouTube[/ame]
 
Yes, it's a great ad from a great American patriot.

Elizabeth-Warren-Ad-11-14--cropped-proto-custom_28.jpg


Elizabeth Warren Debuting First TV Ad | TPM 2012

First Ad: "Who I Am" - YouTube
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top