Justice Clarence Thomas's Conspicuously Nonoriginalist Affirmative Action Jurispruden

[longknife]

Maybe I'm showing my ignorance. I've read this several times and still don't quite grasp what this post is all about. What is “nonoriginalist jurisprudence”? Can someone please translate the following into real English for me?

Conspicuously absent from Justice Thomas’s concurrence is any reference to or application an originalist interpretive methodology

Anyhow, read the whole piece @ Ronald Turner: Justice Clarence Thomas's Conspicuously Nonoriginalist Affirmative Action Jurisprudence Michael Ramsey - The Originalism Blog