Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Abuse of power.Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
Starr believes that for removal of a president by the senate a serious "high" crime must have been committed by the president.
The House can impeach for non-crimes, as an abuse of their power, but for removal by the senate it needs to be both bi-partisan and a serious crime.
If the House impeachment process isn't bi-partisan and fair, the impeachment should fail.
That it was simply over the BJThe man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
I was only 18 at the time but was it not lying about it and coercing others to lie? No?
Yes. Exactly.
He lied under oath. He asked others to do so as well.
Trump has refused to even answer questions under oath. That is the
only reason that he has not lied under oath.
So you're saying rightwinger lied just now?
Did he? What did he say?
Yes, it is.He may have abused his power, so what, that is not a crime, idiot.
Poor Schiff, he and Nadler look like morons in comparison to Trump's legal team. Probably why neither has a job at a real law firm.
You see all of the actors/media and their nasty threats over the last few years?
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
He prosecuted perjury.
For sake of completeness, Clinton was prosecuted for perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1621), suborning perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1622) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S. Code § 1503)
Yep he was impeached for lying about an extra-marital blowjob. Democrats in the Senate own the corruption of lying about a blowjob. Republicans on the other hand, will own Trumpybears corruption of shaking down foreign governments by leveraging bipartisan foreign-aid to gin up announced investigations into his political rivals.
That might be true if it actually happened, but as we all know, it didn't. But even if it did, it's not a crime or impeachable offense.
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
I was only 18 at the time but was it not lying about it and coercing others to lie? No?
Yes. Exactly.
He lied under oath. He asked others to do so as well.
Trump has refused to even answer questions under oath. That is the
only reason that he has not lied under oath.
The man persecuted a blowjob
Shows his credibility
He prosecuted perjury.
For sake of completeness, Clinton was prosecuted for perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1621), suborning perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1622) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S. Code § 1503)
Yep he was impeached for lying about an extra-marital blowjob. Democrats in the Senate own the corruption of lying about a blowjob. Republicans on the other hand, will own Trumpybears corruption of shaking down foreign governments by leveraging bipartisan foreign-aid to gin up announced investigations into his political rivals.
That might be true if it actually happened, but as we all know, it didn't. But even if it did, it's not a crime or impeachable offense.
History has just proven that what ol'Trumpybear did was impeachable. He is impeached. The evidence is exposed before the American independent voters and I expect more evidence of his Shakedown of the Ukraine Scheme will be dripping out for the next 10 months or so. My dream may come true after all and the American Voters will have the opportunity to say to Trumpybear "You're Fired"
Did you ever wonder why Trump's previous lawyers are gone? Because he is defenseless. AD made a complete ass out of himself. Likewise with Starr.Abuse of power.Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
Starr believes that for removal of a president by the senate a serious "high" crime must have been committed by the president.
The House can impeach for non-crimes, as an abuse of their power, but for removal by the senate it needs to be both bi-partisan and a serious crime.
If the House impeachment process isn't bi-partisan and fair, the impeachment should fail.
Can you tell me one President that couldn't be impeached for abuse of power? That's a wide and ambiguous category. As Dershowitz stated in an interview on CNN, the founders discussed Abuse of Power and decided it should not be in the impeachment process. It was rejected.
Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Did you ever wonder why Trump's previous lawyers are gone? Because he is defenseless. AD made a complete ass out of himself. Likewise with Starr.Abuse of power.Trump is a lying fat ass windbag that sings BS to you constantly and you eat it up in gobs. Same with his defense.Ken Starr's testimony was outstanding. He very carefully explained how the House's Articles had no constitutional basis.
The president has the authority to conduct foreign policy, period. The "Rodino Rule" was violated in that for an impeachment to be justified it MUST be bi-partisan. Nixon's was, and Clinton's was, but Trump's was not.
Article-2 is simply void because the subpoenas issued before Resolution 660, the impeachment by the full House are not constitutional. Nancy has no authority to start an impeachment inquiry without the full House vote. Further, Trump has every legal right to "due process" and can have the courts evaluate subpoenas and executive privilege claims.
The defense could have rested right after Ken Starr's summary. It was fantastic.
Starr advised that a crime is essential based on the Constitution in order for the senate to remove a president, and Trump committed no crime.
Bolton's testimony is irrelevant, because it would not allege a crime. No witnesses are needed. The fat lady just sang.
Starr believes that for removal of a president by the senate a serious "high" crime must have been committed by the president.
The House can impeach for non-crimes, as an abuse of their power, but for removal by the senate it needs to be both bi-partisan and a serious crime.
If the House impeachment process isn't bi-partisan and fair, the impeachment should fail.
Can you tell me one President that couldn't be impeached for abuse of power? That's a wide and ambiguous category. As Dershowitz stated in an interview on CNN, the founders discussed Abuse of Power and decided it should not be in the impeachment process. It was rejected.
He prosecuted perjury.
For sake of completeness, Clinton was prosecuted for perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1621), suborning perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1622) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S. Code § 1503)
Yep he was impeached for lying about an extra-marital blowjob. Democrats in the Senate own the corruption of lying about a blowjob. Republicans on the other hand, will own Trumpybears corruption of shaking down foreign governments by leveraging bipartisan foreign-aid to gin up announced investigations into his political rivals.
That might be true if it actually happened, but as we all know, it didn't. But even if it did, it's not a crime or impeachable offense.
History has just proven that what ol'Trumpybear did was impeachable. He is impeached. The evidence is exposed before the American independent voters and I expect more evidence of his Shakedown of the Ukraine Scheme will be dripping out for the next 10 months or so. My dream may come true after all and the American Voters will have the opportunity to say to Trumpybear "You're Fired"
No, it was not impeachable. That's the defense of Trump. Impeachment is for high crimes, misdemeanors, bribery and treason. That's it. Trump engaged in none of that, and neither impeachment article highlights any crime.
How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
well ya see derpboi, he's already been IMPEACHED for obstruction of congress.
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Partisan and he will be acquitted. Also partisan. Wake up.How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
well ya see derpboi, he's already been IMPEACHED for obstruction of congress.
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
For sake of completeness, Clinton was prosecuted for perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1621), suborning perjury (18 U.S. Code § 1622) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S. Code § 1503)
Yep he was impeached for lying about an extra-marital blowjob. Democrats in the Senate own the corruption of lying about a blowjob. Republicans on the other hand, will own Trumpybears corruption of shaking down foreign governments by leveraging bipartisan foreign-aid to gin up announced investigations into his political rivals.
That might be true if it actually happened, but as we all know, it didn't. But even if it did, it's not a crime or impeachable offense.
History has just proven that what ol'Trumpybear did was impeachable. He is impeached. The evidence is exposed before the American independent voters and I expect more evidence of his Shakedown of the Ukraine Scheme will be dripping out for the next 10 months or so. My dream may come true after all and the American Voters will have the opportunity to say to Trumpybear "You're Fired"
No, it was not impeachable. That's the defense of Trump. Impeachment is for high crimes, misdemeanors, bribery and treason. That's it. Trump engaged in none of that, and neither impeachment article highlights any crime.
I believe they felt the Abuse of Power based on the claim that he:—"corruptly solicited the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into— (A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.; and (B) a discredited theory promoted by Russia alleging that Ukraine—rather than Russia—interfered in the 2016 United States Presidential election." reached the bar for High Crimes.
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf
That's why he was impeached.
Partisan and he will be acquitted. Also partisan. Wake up.How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
well ya see derpboi, he's already been IMPEACHED for obstruction of congress.
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Trumps entire defense is to say how everyone is lying but him, then refuse to present any exculpatory evidence ..
I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
Since when? Link....pretty sure he gets acquitted. Impeachment doesn’t equate to guilt. Hence the debate in the Senate.Partisan and he will be acquitted. Also partisan. Wake up.How is he obstructing Congress? They didn’t go through proper protocols and as the Executive Branch he is their equal.I believe his defense is the:
- Verbiage in the Transcript
- Zelensky saying no QPQ
Tell the class exactly wtf that has to do with obstruction of congress ----
well ya see derpboi, he's already been IMPEACHED for obstruction of congress.
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
you dont get acquitted dip -
he gets REMOVED FROM OFFICE - or not
