Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think was very intentional that the State Department did not condition the billion dollars to the Ukraine on Shokin's firing.So you think it’s just a coincidence that the State Dept independently concluded Shokin was corrupt and preventing necessary reforms?
The DOJ cans and will handle any illegal activities he may have engaged in.
That’s evading the question.I think was very intentional that the State Department did not condition the billion dollars o the Ukraine on Shiokin's firing.
Joe corruptly did that all on his own, for personal reasons.
It didn't. That's the point. Joe corruptly did that all on his own, for personal reasons. Literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them.That’s evading the question.
Is it just a coincidence that the State Dept wanted him replace at the exact same time?
Yes, the State Dept did conclude on their own that Shokin was corrupt and needed to be replaced. We have extensive testimony from policy makers saying so.It didn't. That's the point. Joe corruptly did that all on his own, for personal reasons. Literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them.
Huh?
State Department memos contradict Democrats’ Ukraine impeachment narrative
Newly obtained memos found that senior State Department officials had been sending positive words regarding Shokin’s anti-corruption efforts less than one year before Shokin was fired.thepostmillennial.com
Unlike right wing media, the DoJ must operate on facts.LOL, this DOJ will do no such thing. They are bought and paid for by the Democratic Party. No amount of evidence will suffice to warrant an investigation if the target is a Democratic, particularly if his/her last name is Biden.
Fourth, and last time. It was not US policy to withhold the billion dollars contingent on Shokin being fired. All, repeat all document evidence says just the opposite. Including the document you provided. All of the documents say give them the billions without any Shokin strings attached.Yes, the State Dept did conclude on their own that Shokin was corrupt and needed to be replaced. We have extensive testimony from policy makers saying so.
I asked: Is it just a coincidence that the State Dept wanted him replace at the exact same time?Fourth, and last time. It was not US policy to withhold the billion dollars contingent on Shokin being fired. All, repeat all document evidence says just the opposite. Including the document you provided. All of the documents say give them the billions without any Shokin strings attached.
Joe leveraged the billion to corruptly force the Ukraine to fire Shokin. He did that all on his own, for personal reasons. Literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them.
They didn'tI asked: Is it just a coincidence that the State Dept wanted him replace at the exact same time?
You replied: It didn’t.
Please stop changing the specific issue we are debating.
Fourth and last time: Is it just a coincidence that the State Dept wanted Shokin replaced at the exact same time?
They say otherwise.They didn't
Exactlythe rules are to restrictive for public the questioning is limited to 5 minutes per member not enough time to get serious questions asked and answered.
That's exactly what this is about, the corrupt scumbag you support and defend Used $1B in US aid to get Shokin fired.They say otherwise.
Don’t change the subject. Don’t get confused. This isn’t about making funding contingent on having him replaced.
Nah. The ridiculous coinidence that you would have folks swallow is that is simply a coincidence that literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and demand they do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them, threatened to withhold $1B in aid until they fired Shokin.This is just about wanting him to be replaced.
The policy makers at the State Dept concluded Shokin needed to go and was impeding reform.
The right wing media tries to portray Shokin as something he’s not. The right wing media tries to make it seem like the State Dept was in support of him. They weren’t.
It’s just a coincidence?
That's what you keep trying to make it about but it's not what I've been asking. The fact is you are continuing to evade the question.That's exactly what this is about, the corrupt scumbag you support and defend Used $1B in US aid to get Shokin fired.
Using your "logic" Biden should have withheld the aid until the Ukraine fully implemented the Minsk Agreements. He didn't though, did he? Joe only leveraged the billion to corruptly force the Ukraine to fire Shokin.
At least you're getting better at accurately describing the testimony from Devon Archer. He had no idea what the "pressure" was that he was asked about. If there was any pressure coming from Shokin's office, it was most likely in the form of extortion, which was a common tactic that Shokin's office engaged in and was protected by him.Nah. The ridiculous coinidence that you would have folks swallow is that is simply a coincidence that literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and demand they do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them, threatened to withhold $1B in aid until they fired Shokin.
That doesn't even pass the laugh test.
Yes. The question you've been asking is a deflection and diversion away from the corrupt act of the scumbag you are defending.That's what you keep trying to make it about but it's not what I've been asking.
What a bizarre thing to be upset about. Biden achieved the stated US policy of getting a corrupt foreign prosecutor fired and the aid was delivered exactly as planned. No one in the State Dept or Obama Administration had any problem with the negotiation.Yes. The question you've been asking is a deflection and diversion away from the corrupt act of the scumbag you are defending.
The relevant question, that I asked you at the beginning of your runaround, was whether if was official US policy for Biden to withhold $1B in US aid to get Shokin fired. As your own source clearly answered, it is a resounding NO, it was not US policy. Joe was implementing his own corrupt personal needs.
We're done. This horse is quite dead. We can resume when the public hearings of the corrupt scumbag begin.
You keep making this claim and providing NOTHING to support itFourth, and last time. It was not US policy to withhold the billion dollars contingent on Shokin being fired. All, repeat all document evidence says just the opposite. Including the document you provided. All of the documents say give them the billions without any Shokin strings attached.
Joe leveraged the billion to corruptly force the Ukraine to fire Shokin. He did that all on his own, for personal reasons. Literally 5 days after Hunter's bosses asked him to call "Washington" and do something about the pressure the company thought the Ukranian gvt was putting on them.
Colonel Anus:Hunter, which whore was your favorite?
Hunter, you never paid 1 bill for your father?
Hunter, from who did you buy your crack?
Hunter, did you make a personal business deal in China after traveling on AIR FORCE 2?
I think you desperately require deprogramming.
