Zone1 Jesus Was a Socialist

Where is it? All I see is Satan's kingdom.
How pessimistic.

In the first century, the disciples began to recognize their place in God’s kingdom on earth. Paul proclaimed citizenship in the kingdom for himself and his contemporaries (Col 1:13). The letter to the Hebrews exhorts believers to be grateful for the kingdom they had received (Heb 12:28). And the Revelator declared himself a partner in the kingdom with his brethren (Rv 1:9).

The kingdom had also come within Caiaphas’ grasp. Jesus informed him and the Sanhedrin, “But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven” (Mt 26:64). From now on, he apprised the high priest.

When reasoning with a crowd of onlookers, Jesus told them that because he cast out demons in the name of God and not Beelzebul, the kingdom of God had come upon them (Lk 11:19-20). Yes, upon them, that crowd of onlookers.

The kingdom’s arrival is clearly a first-century phenomenon.

Now, who besides Christ is in charge? Who in this kingdom is redistributing wealth, discounting minority votes, amassing an ideological following? Who's the socialist?

That's the gist of my counter to the OP. No socialism with Christ. All are equals.
 
The Twelve Tribes will rule the earth under Jesus.

jesus was the repudiation of judaism -

believe not the crucifiers wrote the c-bible if you please, to believe those tribes will exist in the heavenly future were that to transpire is beyond even the zealotry of the most depraved christians of all times much less that any tribe will rule anything.
 
jesus was the repudiation of judaism -

believe not the crucifiers wrote the c-bible if you please, to believe those tribes will exist in the heavenly future were that to transpire is beyond even the zealotry of the most depraved christians of all times much less that any tribe will rule anything.
The kingdom only exists in the church at this time.

I have brought the kingdom to my workplace, but few recognize it, although my boss has an inkling.
 
He pitched the idea of a new religion. He has the patent for lack of a better word.

How many other pitchmen have ever had their idea still making billions of dollars a year 2000 years later?
He wasn’t even a priest. So, what authority did he have? None. And, if it’s a new religion, then it has no perpetuation going forward. Did he do some good? Yes. He directed the religious to organize the Bible. As were the Founding Fathers of the U.S. inspired of God, so were those bishops. Being inspired “of” God doesn’t mean they had authority to act in the name of God to perform ordinances including baptism. So, as far as translated and interpreted correctly, it’s the word of God. Just as the Constitution is our guidance as it is interpreted correctly.

As I stated before, to run any organization profit or non-profit that is in almost all countries, it takes billions of dollars a year to run. People in our country are not forced to pay tithes or put money into a plate. It’s voluntary. Unlike workers controlled by their Democrat union bosses.

I’m not sure why you can’t understand any of this? Feel FREE to explain. Please use logic and reason as I have and leave the emotions to the atheists and Democrats.
 
jesus was the repudiation of judaism -

believe not the crucifiers wrote the c-bible if you please, to believe those tribes will exist in the heavenly future were that to transpire is beyond even the zealotry of the most depraved christians of all times much less that any tribe will rule anything.
The crucifiers did not write the Bible. Revelators who had visions and were with the Lord wrote their experiences and the words the Lord wants us to know.
 
He wasn’t even a priest. So, what authority did he have? None. And, if it’s a new religion, then it has no perpetuation going forward. Did he do some good? Yes. He directed the religious to organize the Bible. As were the Founding Fathers of the U.S. inspired of God, so were those bishops. Being inspired “of” God doesn’t mean they had authority to act in the name of God to perform ordinances including baptism. So, as far as translated and interpreted correctly, it’s the word of God. Just as the Constitution is our guidance as it is interpreted correctly.

As I stated before, to run any organization profit or non-profit that is in almost all countries, it takes billions of dollars a year to run. People in our country are not forced to pay tithes or put money into a plate. It’s voluntary. Unlike workers controlled by their Democrat union bosses.

I’m not sure why you can’t understand any of this? Feel FREE to explain. Please use logic and reason as I have and leave the emotions to the atheists and Democrats.
He started a new religion he was the founder and recruited priests to do the recruiting and collecting of money for him. What other venture capitalist has ever has the idea he pitched still making money 2000 years later?



And if you don't want to be in a union you don't have to work in a union shop so yes paying union dues is still voluntary.
 
He started a new religion he was the founder and recruited priests to do the recruiting and collecting of money for him. What other venture capitalist has ever has the idea he pitched still making money 2000 years later?



And if you don't want to be in a union you don't have to work in a union shop so yes paying union dues is still voluntary.
So? What's your point? Like I said, you can't run any form of organization without the funds to do it. And, if you don't want to contribute your tithes and offerings, you don't have to either. The difference is you can still work in the true kingdom of God. Just not in the Temples. You can go along robbing God.
 
So? What's your point? Like I said, you can't run any form of organization without the funds to do it. And, if you don't want to contribute your tithes and offerings, you don't have to either. The difference is you can still work in the true kingdom of God. Just not in the Temples. You can go along robbing God.

All I said was the Jesus was the greatest venture capitalist that ever lived why are you getting your panties in a twist over that?
 
Socialism, like capitalism, is materialist. Jesus was not.
Capitalism provides the best means of caring for people and for the for people to rise out of starvation, so Jesus would be for capitalism, but not for attachment to wealth. Socialism impoverishes all.
 
I'm not asking you to verify anything.

Christian religions have been bilking people out of their money for over 2000 years.
So according to you, people voluntarily using their money the way they wish is them being bilked?
 
How many times do we have to debunk this? God and Jesus would clearly be on the side of Republicans, the party of family values. Jesus was woke? Come on, you people should know better than this.

---“Jesus Was a Socialist”: Christianity in Crisis as Conservatives Finally Realize Jesus Was Woke---


Jesus rose from the dead. He's not dead. That means he's alive. He's got a Socialist sitting on Peter's Throne.

 
So according to you, people voluntarily using their money the way they wish is them being bilked?
Yes because they are using the idea of god to get donations.

You can;t get to heaven if you don't tithe 10% you know.
 
He wasn’t even a priest. So, what authority did he have? None. And, if it’s a new religion, then it has no perpetuation going forward. Did he do some good? Yes. He directed the religious to organize the Bible. As were the Founding Fathers of the U.S. inspired of God, so were those bishops. Being inspired “of” God doesn’t mean they had authority to act in the name of God to perform ordinances including baptism. So, as far as translated and interpreted correctly, it’s the word of God. Just as the Constitution is our guidance as it is interpreted correctly.

As I stated before, to run any organization profit or non-profit that is in almost all countries, it takes billions of dollars a year to run. People in our country are not forced to pay tithes or put money into a plate. It’s voluntary. Unlike workers controlled by their Democrat union bosses.

I’m not sure why you can’t understand any of this? Feel FREE to explain. Please use logic and reason as I have and leave the emotions to the atheists and Democrats.
It's always comical when atheists condemn voluntary Christianity while praising coercive atheist regimes.
 
Yes because they are using the idea of god to get donations.

You can;t get to heaven if you don't tithe 10% you know.
Well, all the false claims about climate change has caused the political leaders of the Democrat Party to bilk people out of money to donate to the overcharging of electricity and gas. You godless atheists are pushing this false god. I don’t believe in your gods. Yet I’m forced to pay higher costs and higher taxes. 10%? How about 12, 22-35% by your state gods. We are forced to pay these or jailed.

As believers on the one true God, we can rob God or not. We have the choice and are not jailed. As for Heaven, for most will obtain heaven except those who deny the Holy Ghost. It will not be because they didn’t pay tithing. There are many mansions of heaven. At least 3 that Paul revealed in First Corinthians chapter 15.
 
Yes because they are using the idea of god to get donations.

You can;t get to heaven if you don't tithe 10% you know.
The tithing requirement for Heaven is untrue, but giving is voluntary and for a great purpose, so how is that bilking? You atheists just don't get it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top