It's On! The Teaparty Lashes Back At Boehner Calling Him A Liberal

The alleged "sane middle adults" got us into this mess. So, stick your paternalistic condescending consensus and compromise where the sun don't shine.

Big problems call for bold solutions, not any of your weak, middling, status quo pablum.

How are those "bold solutions" working out for you with a all time low of 13% approval for the GOP?
What's the approval rate for congress as a whole, Mr. Smartypants?

In any case, the CR with the sequester in force was a better deal than the Ryan-Murry sellout. Timid as they were, at least we got some small measure of spending restraint.l

How much of that congressional approval rating belongs to the failed "bold solutions" that the Tea Party tried to unconstitutionally ram down the nation's throat?
 
How are those "bold solutions" working out for you with a all time low of 13% approval for the GOP?
What's the approval rate for congress as a whole, Mr. Smartypants?

In any case, the CR with the sequester in force was a better deal than the Ryan-Murry sellout. Timid as they were, at least we got some small measure of spending restraint.l

How much of that congressional approval rating belongs to the failed "bold solutions" that the Tea Party tried to unconstitutionally ram down the nation's throat?
The approval ratings don't take into account why the person being polled disapproves. You really can't be so dense as to recognize that, can you?

No bold solutions were implemented, so any claim that they failed is specious on its face.

And what is your evidence that what Tea Party members did was unconstitutional?
 
What's the approval rate for congress as a whole, Mr. Smartypants?

In any case, the CR with the sequester in force was a better deal than the Ryan-Murry sellout. Timid as they were, at least we got some small measure of spending restraint.l

How much of that congressional approval rating belongs to the failed "bold solutions" that the Tea Party tried to unconstitutionally ram down the nation's throat?
The approval ratings don't take into account why the person being polled disapproves. You really can't be so dense as to recognize that, can you?

No bold solutions were implemented, so any claim that they failed is specious on its face.

And what is your evidence that what Tea Party members did was unconstitutional?

Your "bold solutions" were to shut down the government and to refuse to raise the debt ceiling. The shutdown cost american taxpayers $24 billion and did not achieve your goal since the government was reopened 16 days later. The unconstitutional part was to refuse to raise the debt ceiling thereby violating the full faith and credit of the US government. That was avoided by the ADULTS coming up with a solution at the 11th hour to save the nation.

As far as approval ratings go it is simple enough to note that the Dems ratings are higher than the record lows for the GOP therefore the low congressional ratings must be being brought down the Tea Party's failed "bold solutions" that harmed the American taxpayers.

FYI I suggest that you refrain from the puerile slurs, they don't add anything of value to your position.
 
How much of that congressional approval rating belongs to the failed "bold solutions" that the Tea Party tried to unconstitutionally ram down the nation's throat?
The approval ratings don't take into account why the person being polled disapproves. You really can't be so dense as to recognize that, can you?

No bold solutions were implemented, so any claim that they failed is specious on its face.

And what is your evidence that what Tea Party members did was unconstitutional?

Your "bold solutions" were to shut down the government and to refuse to raise the debt ceiling. The shutdown cost american taxpayers $24 billion and did not achieve your goal since the government was reopened 16 days later. The unconstitutional part was to refuse to raise the debt ceiling thereby violating the full faith and credit of the US government. That was avoided by the ADULTS coming up with a solution at the 11th hour to save the nation.

As far as approval ratings go it is simple enough to note that the Dems ratings are higher than the record lows for the GOP therefore the low congressional ratings must be being brought down the Tea Party's failed "bold solutions" that harmed the American taxpayers.

FYI I suggest that you refrain from the puerile slurs, they don't add anything of value to your position.
Arguing crappy democrat approval over crappy republican approval is like who is the winner of the Loser Olympics.

Only a paltry 14% of the government was shut down, you weak whiner.

The $24 billion that the shutdown "cost" America is economically illiterate spin.

There was never any threat of a default, as there was more than enough revenue coming in to cover expenses. The "full faith and credit" argument is more economically illiterate DNC/ media-industrial complex crap.

The pretense that your squishy, gutless position is "adult" projects a slur on its face, by the presupposition that all who don't agree are not. If you want to be considered any more than the typical haughty, paternalistic, know-it-all jackass, then maybe you need to clean out your own back yard first. You know, that added value thing.
 
The approval ratings don't take into account why the person being polled disapproves. You really can't be so dense as to recognize that, can you?

No bold solutions were implemented, so any claim that they failed is specious on its face.

And what is your evidence that what Tea Party members did was unconstitutional?

Your "bold solutions" were to shut down the government and to refuse to raise the debt ceiling. The shutdown cost american taxpayers $24 billion and did not achieve your goal since the government was reopened 16 days later. The unconstitutional part was to refuse to raise the debt ceiling thereby violating the full faith and credit of the US government. That was avoided by the ADULTS coming up with a solution at the 11th hour to save the nation.

As far as approval ratings go it is simple enough to note that the Dems ratings are higher than the record lows for the GOP therefore the low congressional ratings must be being brought down the Tea Party's failed "bold solutions" that harmed the American taxpayers.

FYI I suggest that you refrain from the puerile slurs, they don't add anything of value to your position.
Arguing crappy democrat approval over crappy republican approval is like who is the winner of the Loser Olympics.

Only a paltry 14% of the government was shut down, you weak whiner.

The $24 billion that the shutdown "cost" America is economically illiterate spin.

There was never any threat of a default, as there was more than enough revenue coming in to cover expenses. The "full faith and credit" argument is more economically illiterate DNC/ media-industrial complex crap.

The pretense that your squishy, gutless position is "adult" projects a slur on its face, by the presupposition that all who don't agree are not. If you want to be considered any more than the typical haughty, paternalistic, know-it-all jackass, then maybe you need to clean out your own back yard first. You know, that added value thing.

Your inability to engage in civil discourse means that your posts on this topic will be given all the respect they deserve. Have a nice day.
 
How are those "bold solutions" working out for you with a all time low of 13% approval for the GOP?
What's the approval rate for congress as a whole, Mr. Smartypants?

In any case, the CR with the sequester in force was a better deal than the Ryan-Murry sellout. Timid as they were, at least we got some small measure of spending restraint.l

How much of that congressional approval rating belongs to the failed "bold solutions" that the Tea Party tried to unconstitutionally ram down the nation's throat?

Not much. I think most of it has to do with a hostile liberal press.
 
Your "bold solutions" were to shut down the government and to refuse to raise the debt ceiling. The shutdown cost american taxpayers $24 billion and did not achieve your goal since the government was reopened 16 days later. The unconstitutional part was to refuse to raise the debt ceiling thereby violating the full faith and credit of the US government. That was avoided by the ADULTS coming up with a solution at the 11th hour to save the nation.

As far as approval ratings go it is simple enough to note that the Dems ratings are higher than the record lows for the GOP therefore the low congressional ratings must be being brought down the Tea Party's failed "bold solutions" that harmed the American taxpayers.

FYI I suggest that you refrain from the puerile slurs, they don't add anything of value to your position.
Arguing crappy democrat approval over crappy republican approval is like who is the winner of the Loser Olympics.

Only a paltry 14% of the government was shut down, you weak whiner.

The $24 billion that the shutdown "cost" America is economically illiterate spin.

There was never any threat of a default, as there was more than enough revenue coming in to cover expenses. The "full faith and credit" argument is more economically illiterate DNC/ media-industrial complex crap.

The pretense that your squishy, gutless position is "adult" projects a slur on its face, by the presupposition that all who don't agree are not. If you want to be considered any more than the typical haughty, paternalistic, know-it-all jackass, then maybe you need to clean out your own back yard first. You know, that added value thing.

Your inability to engage in civil discourse means that your posts on this topic will be given all the respect they deserve. Have a nice day.
Your inability to consider any other opinion but yours as "adult" will earn you all the disdain you deserve.
 
Arguing crappy democrat approval over crappy republican approval is like who is the winner of the Loser Olympics.

Only a paltry 14% of the government was shut down, you weak whiner.

The $24 billion that the shutdown "cost" America is economically illiterate spin.

There was never any threat of a default, as there was more than enough revenue coming in to cover expenses. The "full faith and credit" argument is more economically illiterate DNC/ media-industrial complex crap.

The pretense that your squishy, gutless position is "adult" projects a slur on its face, by the presupposition that all who don't agree are not. If you want to be considered any more than the typical haughty, paternalistic, know-it-all jackass, then maybe you need to clean out your own back yard first. You know, that added value thing.

Your inability to engage in civil discourse means that your posts on this topic will be given all the respect they deserve. Have a nice day.
Your inability to consider any other opinion but yours as "adult" will earn you all the disdain you deserve.

Ironic!
 
True, and now that is settled We the People in the sane moderate middle would appreciate it if the children from both extremes went out to play so that the adults can be allowed to get back to the process of governing by consensus and compromise.

"governing by consensus and compromise" is what got us into this mess,
Wanna rethink your "sane moderate" comment?
 
Your inability to engage in civil discourse means that your posts on this topic will be given all the respect they deserve. Have a nice day.
Your inability to consider any other opinion but yours as "adult" will earn you all the disdain you deserve.

Ironic!
You're the one who set yourself up as the only adult in the room, sport.

Now, getting called on your haughty, paternalistic snobbery is ironic?

That's a hoot. :lol:
 
True, and now that is settled We the People in the sane moderate middle would appreciate it if the children from both extremes went out to play so that the adults can be allowed to get back to the process of governing by consensus and compromise.

"governing by consensus and compromise" is what got us into this mess,
Wanna rethink your "sane moderate" comment?

The current "mess" consists of too little income for the current level of spending. At the turn of the century tax revenues were reducing the deficit and on a path to bring down the national debt. That trend was reversed when "tax cuts" were given to the wealthy elite 1% on the bogus premise that they were "job creators" and would use the additional funds to actually "create jobs". Those additional "jobs" would result in greater tax revenues that would ultimately reduce the deficit and the debt.

However in the real world none of those jobs actually materialized. The wealthy elite 1% continued to enjoy their massive tax cuts while jobs that paid a living wage with benefits were offshored in a wholesale manner. This too resulted in greater tax savings for the wealthy elite 1%. This Ponzi scheme was not a matter of consensus and compromise. Instead it was pushed through congress while the GOP had control of both houses and the Whitehouse.

Genuine fiscal conservatives would hold the wealthy elite 1% accountable for the trillions of debt that has been racked up at taxpayer expense for failing to create the jobs. However the situation we currently see is that all attempts to recover those trillions are being stymied by the GOP.

The sane and moderate consensus solution is to find a way to reduce spending and increase revenues.
 
True, and now that is settled We the People in the sane moderate middle would appreciate it if the children from both extremes went out to play so that the adults can be allowed to get back to the process of governing by consensus and compromise.

"governing by consensus and compromise" is what got us into this mess,
Wanna rethink your "sane moderate" comment?

The current "mess" consists of too little income for the current level of spending.
No, the problem is spending, period.

The government is taking in well in excess of $2.5 trillion a year. There is no revenue problem.

The sane and moderate consensus solution is to find a way to reduce spending and increase revenues.
There you go again, setting your view up as the only "sane" one in the room. Is it any wonder you get considered a condescending paternalistic ass?
 
The problem with the Teabaggers is they don't see themselves as the extremists.


Look Here Chump;......"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no Vice.......and also let me remind you--moderation in the pursuit of Jusstice is no Virtue."
B.G.
 
"governing by consensus and compromise" is what got us into this mess,
Wanna rethink your "sane moderate" comment?

The current "mess" consists of too little income for the current level of spending.
No, the problem is spending, period.

The government is taking in well in excess of $2.5 trillion a year. There is no revenue problem.

The sane and moderate consensus solution is to find a way to reduce spending and increase revenues.
There you go again, setting your view up as the only "sane" one in the room. Is it any wonder you get considered a condescending paternalistic ass?

:dig::dig::dig:
 
I hope this will get the movement going and we can get the rino's out. Then replace them with real conservatives. That's when we can repair whats been done.

Query: WTF is a "real conservative" these days? Is it a loon like Bachman or a big business darling like Boehner? Seems to be the only kinds we have to choose from.

Too many want to adopt the 'conservative label' without knowing what it really is..... the White Working Class can understand though who is with them and who is against them....thats all they need to know.

The p.c. rinos should just stand up and admit they had rather see Hillary win than a Real Conservative.
 
The current "mess" consists of too little income for the current level of spending.
No, the problem is spending, period.

The government is taking in well in excess of $2.5 trillion a year. There is no revenue problem.

The sane and moderate consensus solution is to find a way to reduce spending and increase revenues.
There you go again, setting your view up as the only "sane" one in the room. Is it any wonder you get considered a condescending paternalistic ass?

:dig::dig::dig:
Yes, you are digging.

Best you stop, lest you actually like appearing as the condescending paternalistic ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top