It’s Increasingly Clear The Feds Were Protecting Joe Biden, Not Hunter

[MagicMike]

Now, I’m not saying the feds were covering up proof of Joe Biden’s illegality — though circumstantial evidence and common sense say the family business couldn’t function without his participation.

From your own BS link.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

C A, show us the evidence.

 

[BluesLegend]

They didn't call Joe the big guy for nothing.

 

[BluesLegend]

No evidence, just accusations.

Whistle blowers must be believed, Democrats said so.

 

[Concerned American]

C A, show us the evidence.

Next time, do your own research you ignorant fuck. Hearing Wrap Up: IRS Whistleblowers Expose How Bidens Were Treated Differently - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

 

[Lesh]

Lots of people believe him, scumbag. Who they don't believe is you, the FBI, the DOJ, Joe Biden or any member of his cabinet.

“Lots of people “ believe Bigfoot is real

 

[Lesh]

Next time, do your own research you ignorant fuck. Hearing Wrap Up: IRS Whistleblowers Expose How Bidens Were Treated Differently - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

Did they have any evidence to back up their claims?

No?

Oh

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Next time, do your own research you ignorant fuck. Hearing Wrap Up: IRS Whistleblowers Expose How Bidens Were Treated Differently - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

You have to show us the incontrovertible evidence, which you have not, o triggered one.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

“Lots of people “ believe Bigfoot is real

bripat saw Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

“Lots of people “ believe Bigfoot is real

bripat saw Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes. Your post and commentary are horseshit.

If you could manage a moment of honesty, you’d recognize that they quote their source and they provide the actual form.

You’re a retard.

You keep getting owned by "retards", so what does it make you?


Their source is SAY-SO OF SOMEONE ELSE'S SAY-SO.

"Burisma CFO Vadirm Pojarskii told an FBI asset that Hunter Biden was hired onto the board of directors to "protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems."

Does that actually prove that Hunter protected Burisma through his dad? No it doesn't. Even without questioning anything, even if Burisma trully hired Hunter to get Joe Biden's favor - DOES NOT MEAN THEY ACTUALLY GOT IT.

We know Hunter told all kinds of bs to all kinds of people, that doesn't establish that Joe Biden was involved in any of it. So where is the proof?

 

[Arlette]

This is the last stand of the US justice system. If the Biden Crime Family is given a pass on this massive sellout of America to foreign nationals, then we're done. 17 million dollars from China, Romania and Ukraine distributed to 9 different members of the Biden Crime Family.......SO FAR.

File charges already. This is boring

 

[Billiejeens]

The country is in a dark sad place.

Rampant out in the open corruption that will never be brought to justice.

Open, in one's face corruption is a sure sign of a banana republic type country.

The family of the powerful become fabulously wealthy and all not compliant, silenced or arrested.

 

[Nostra]

They produced nothing at all that incriminates any Biden.

Stay stupid, it’s what you do best.

 

[Nostra]

“Lots of people “ believe Bigfoot is real

I’m sure some people believe you have a functioning brain, but that has no bearing on the topic.

 

[Nostra]

You keep getting owned by "retards", so what does it make you?


Their source is SAY-SO OF SOMEONE ELSE'S SAY-SO.

"Burisma CFO Vadirm Pojarskii told an FBI asset that Hunter Biden was hired onto the board of directors to "protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems."

Does that actually prove that Hunter protected Burisma through his dad? No it doesn't. Even without questioning anything, even if Burisma trully hired Hunter to get Joe Biden's favor - DOES NOT MEAN THEY ACTUALLY GOT IT.

We know Hunter told all kinds of bs to all kinds of people, that doesn't establish that Joe Biden was involved in any of it. So where is the proof?

If they weren’t getting what they were paying for, why did they keep paying, Simp?

 

[Foxfyre]

It’s Increasingly Clear The Feds Were Protecting Joe Biden, ​

Not Hunter​

Whistleblower testimony strongly suggests interference in the Hunter Biden tax case was meant to defuse any inquiry into Joe Biden.​

It's Increasingly Clear The Feds Were Protecting Joe, Not Hunter

Whistleblower testimony strongly suggests interference in the Hunter Biden tax case was meant to defuse any inquiry into Joe Biden.

thefederalist.com

20 Jul 2023 ~~ By David Harsanyi

Two veteran IRS agents with impeccable records have now testified under oath that federal officials not only slow-walked the Hunter Biden probe but nixed efforts to investigate Joe’s role in the family business. And though legacy media are conveniently apathetic about the developments, they seem somewhat newsworthy to me.
On Wednesday, we learned the identity of “Whistleblower X.” Joseph Ziegler, a self-proclaimed Democrat who worked at the agency since 2010, told the House Oversight Committee that he handled 95 percent of the evidence in the Hunter tax investigation. Ziegler testified that throughout the five-year investigation, he was “handcuffed,” “hamstrung,” “marginalized,” and ultimately stopped from moving forward in the manner he would for any other scofflaw.
Ziegler wrote a 99-page memo laying out the case for felony charges, wholly consistent with the IRS guidelines governing charging in tax evasion cases. He maintains that every investigator and prosecutor on the case agreed felonies were in order — all of which should be easy enough to find out.
Sure, it’s fun to talk about salacious parts of the Hunter case, but the far bigger concern should be finding out why companies operating in authoritarian nations sent Biden $17 million. It would be a fair question even if there had been no criminal investigation.
Now, I’m not saying the feds were covering up proof of Joe Biden’s illegality — though circumstantial evidence and common sense say the family business couldn’t function without his participation. I’m saying it’s increasingly clear the Justice Department didn’t want to find out if there was any evidence. No one wanted a replay of the And many in the Obama admin KNEW this was going on and yet never intervened. Hillary-illegal server scandal. And that’s how Hunter got his sweet deal.
~Snip~
Any real political journalist with access would be pressuring the White And many in the Obama admin KNEW this was going on and yet never intervened. ouse daily to explain what services Joe Biden’s son, brother, and grown grandchildren — and virtually every other member of his family — rendered foreign entities in Romania, China, and Ukraine that were worth over $17 million. The president could make this all go away by explaining the situation.
Frankly, I don’t expect to ever find out. It is what it is, but please stop telling me no one is above the law.
Commentary:
Many in the Obama admin KNEW this was going on and yet never intervened.
It was discussed briefly during the Trump impeachment trial, were And many in the Obama admin KNEW this was going on and yet never intervened. Hunter`s foreign dealings were flagged twice, were disregarded and buried.
There as been has more than sufficient evidence to open impeachment hearings and appoint a special prosecutor. But I suspect that all of those “no one is above the law” people will stay silent.
Frankly, I don’t expect to ever find out. It is what it is, but please stop telling me no one is above the law, especially wen a blindman can see the truth of the matter..

​

I haven't had a chance to watch the whole hearing, but three things seem very clear. Somebody correct me if I missed something:

1. The whistleblowers laid out a damning case against Hunter Biden and the Biden family.

2. The Republicans each one gave the whistleblowers opportunity to confirm their statements and affirm evidence in this matter.

3. Not a single Democrat made any effort to defend Hunter or the Biden family but spent their 10 minutes reciting the sins of Donald Trump. Eleanor Holmes Norton deviated it a bit to suggest Hunter Biden has been thoroughly investigated and there's nothing there.

 

[Lesh]

I haven't had a chance to watch the whole hearing, but three things seem very clear. Somebody correct me if I missed something:

1. The whistleblowers laid out a damning case against Hunter Biden and the Biden family.

2. The Republicans each one gave the whistleblowers opportunity to confirm their statements and affirm evidence in this matter.

3. Not a single Democrat made any effort to defend Hunter or the Biden family but spent their 10 minutes reciting the sins of Donald Trump. Eleanor Holmes Norton deviated it a bit to suggest Hunter Biden has been thoroughly investigated and there's nothing there.

1. With no evidence

The rest is nonsense

 

[Foxfyre]

1. With no evidence

The rest is nonsense

Seems to me they had it documented pretty thoroughly. Tax issues generally have a lot of documentation. Please inform us what a whistleblower said that had no evidence?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Where is the evidence than links Hunter to Joe for influence peddling?