Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 13,219
- 2,253
- 290
Exactly. And there will never peace with Israel as long as people insist that Israel must not exist. Thank you for doubling down on the existential threat part of my post.
Israel is by no means looking for peace, with it's Lebensraum style settlements, and killing far more Palestinians, than vice-versa.
Dude, you literally just said that Israel's existence is the problem. There can not be peace as long as people think the presence of Jews in their historical and ancestral homeland is a problem.
Hand over the loot you owe me Goyim. Jews think half of Eurasia owes them money, from Persia, to Morocco, from Russia to Germany.
But, they don't think they owe Palestinians a damn thing, just goes to show what kind of selfish people they are.
The Jewish people have a right to self-determination, sovereignty and peace in their ancestral and historical homelands in Israel. Yes or no?
The Arab Palestinian starting place is "no" to that question. You can't have peace when you are under an existential threat. Do you understand what that means? A threat against their existence.
No, because for 1,400 years Arabs have lived in Palestine.
I didn't ask about Arab rights. I asked about Jewish rights. I am not in any way suggesting that Arabs do not ALSO have these rights.
So, let's try this a different way.
From where do a people's rights arise? For example, 1400 years ago, or 2000 years ago or 3000 years ago did the Jewish people have rights to self-determination, sovereignty and peace in their ancestral and historical homelands?
The options are: 1. Rights to a homeland are inherent and can not be abrogated. Or 2. Rights to a homeland can be lost.
Which is it, for the Jews? Door #1 or door #2? And why?