Is this the Anti-Obama only Thread?

JimH52

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2007
46,532
24,409
2,645
US
It seems to be going that way. Just asking so I will know where to post.
 
It is obvious that pro-Obama threads are being move.
 
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.

Desperation makes one do strange things. It is hilarious:lol:
 
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.


:lol:.. It seems Democrats lie to themselves and others so often they actually end up believing the lies... very sad indeed..:(


Trickle down dishonestly from their leaders and consistent brainwashing by the liberal media also plays a substantial part in this mass denial/hysteria....>>>>>


Thank Goodness there are people out there who are willing to take their time to show you to the road of enlightenment....:eusa_angel:
 
Last edited:
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. They believe nothing of the sort.

What's actually happening is that they realize that their defeat is inevitable, so they're setting the stage now to acclimate people to revising history, so that later on they can claim that they actually won.
 
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.

for the vast majority of them even if their party wins they lose.
But they are too stupit to realize it.
 
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. They believe nothing of the sort.

What's actually happening is that they realize that their defeat is inevitable, so they're setting the stage now to acclimate people to revising history, so that later on they can claim that they actually won.


Why don't you cite for all of us a list of tangible examples of actual historical revisionism and the particular Republican/Conservative that dd it...with links to it.
 
It doesn't matter where threads are being moved. The Mittster is still in big trouble. Soon, the GOP fathers will abandon him and concentrate on keeping seats in the Senate and House. He is quickly becoming a liability for the GOP. I would call him a "legitimate" liability.
 
It doesn't matter where threads are being moved. The Mittster is still in big trouble. Soon, the GOP fathers will abandon him and concentrate on keeping seats in the Senate and House. He is quickly becoming a liability for the GOP. I would call him a "legitimate" liability.

You just hit the nail on the head. So what will get done if Obama is reelected? So you obviously hate your country enough to reelect him knowing full well that the House and maybe even the Senate will be Republican.


I guess you do want more of the same. That really sounds like a smart, viable alternative to actually trying something different when what we have, is at best, only marginally working.

You're not too bright are you? Lights on but no one home? Maybe it's best that you post link after link to meaningless sites. At least it keeps you busy.
 
What's obvious, IMO, is the right wingers on this board are in Panic Mode and actually believe if they revise history often enough their party will win.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. They believe nothing of the sort.

What's actually happening is that they realize that their defeat is inevitable, so they're setting the stage now to acclimate people to revising history, so that later on they can claim that they actually won.


Why don't you cite for all of us a list of tangible examples of actual historical revisionism and the particular Republican/Conservative that dd it...with links to it.

You're an idiot.
 
It doesn't matter where threads are being moved. The Mittster is still in big trouble. Soon, the GOP fathers will abandon him and concentrate on keeping seats in the Senate and House. He is quickly becoming a liability for the GOP. I would call him a "legitimate" liability.

You just hit the nail on the head. So what will get done if Obama is reelected? So you obviously hate your country enough to reelect him knowing full well that the House and maybe even the Senate will be Republican.


I guess you do want more of the same. That really sounds like a smart, viable alternative to actually trying something different when what we have, is at best, only marginally working.

You're not too bright are you? Lights on but no one home? Maybe it's best that you post link after link to meaningless sites. At least it keeps you busy.

Mister Akin has made sure the GOP will not take the Senate. He and his "legitimate rape" theory. Then other Dems will ride Obama's coat tail into the Senate.

If you don't understand that, ask a grownup to explain it to you.
 
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. They believe nothing of the sort.

What's actually happening is that they realize that their defeat is inevitable, so they're setting the stage now to acclimate people to revising history, so that later on they can claim that they actually won.


Why don't you cite for all of us a list of tangible examples of actual historical revisionism and the particular Republican/Conservative that dd it...with links to it.

You're an idiot.

That's one way of getting out of lie!



:clap2::lol::badgrin::clap2:
 
It doesn't matter where threads are being moved. The Mittster is still in big trouble. Soon, the GOP fathers will abandon him and concentrate on keeping seats in the Senate and House. He is quickly becoming a liability for the GOP. I would call him a "legitimate" liability.

You just hit the nail on the head. So what will get done if Obama is reelected? So you obviously hate your country enough to reelect him knowing full well that the House and maybe even the Senate will be Republican.


I guess you do want more of the same. That really sounds like a smart, viable alternative to actually trying something different when what we have, is at best, only marginally working.

You're not too bright are you? Lights on but no one home? Maybe it's best that you post link after link to meaningless sites. At least it keeps you busy.

The ‘one term president’ maneuver didn’t produce the expected results. So go ahead and try blocking important legislation if you somehow manage to get that majority. You’ll lose everything not only in 2016, but for the foreseeable future. It will definitely show who 'hates this country' by putting politics first.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top