The laws of logic don't become absolute when authored by a sentient mind, or "god's mind."
They're the opposite, because they're based on his whim in that scenario. That's not what absolute means, "dependent" upon something (god's mind). That is the opposite of what absolute means.
Therefore, any argument presupposing absolute logic or knowledge is an argument AGAINST god being the author.
See how that shoddy, shoddy fucking logic works? It's retarded.
The laws are logic are absolute because they apply to actual existence, and existence is absolute as "proponents of the five" have already conceded.
Chase your tails, dimwits.