Czernobog
Gold Member
I have noticed that in several discussions I have with Christians, the point of contention seems to be in attempting to separate the Bible into two parts - the part that must be accepted as accurate (The New Testament), and the part that doesn't (The Old Testament).
So, I have a question. The creation Truth Foundation, in their statement of faith, claims, “The unique divine inspiration of all the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments as originally given, so that they are infallibly and uniquely authoritative and free from error of any sort, in all matters with which they deal, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological.”
I would ask the Christians on this forum if they agree with that statement, bearing in mind:
First, they make no distinction between the Old, and the New Testament, and
Second, paying particular attention to the highlighted portion.
So, I have a question. The creation Truth Foundation, in their statement of faith, claims, “The unique divine inspiration of all the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments as originally given, so that they are infallibly and uniquely authoritative and free from error of any sort, in all matters with which they deal, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological.”
I would ask the Christians on this forum if they agree with that statement, bearing in mind:
First, they make no distinction between the Old, and the New Testament, and
Second, paying particular attention to the highlighted portion.