Simple yes or no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Depends on stance Sallow....
If one subscribes to a collectivist society , taxation is an essential catalyst to civility
If one sunscribes to a libertarian society, taxation is a mandatory obligation only the uncivil misfits would need take advantage of
Simple yes or no.
Simple yes or no.
I voted no, but only because your wording left me unable to vote yes.
First, there is the dictionary definition of socialism that doesn't even require 'taxation' since everything is already owned by the government.
But even if I ignore that, it's still not socialism until the taxes are used to promote the general welfare. For example, taxation occurs under feudalism too.
Simple yes or no.
I voted no, but only because your wording left me unable to vote yes.
First, there is the dictionary definition of socialism that doesn't even require 'taxation' since everything is already owned by the government.
But even if I ignore that, it's still not socialism until the taxes are used to promote the general welfare. For example, taxation occurs under feudalism too.
So taxes used to promote a military isn't socialism?
Simple yes or no.
I voted no, but only because your wording left me unable to vote yes.
First, there is the dictionary definition of socialism that doesn't even require 'taxation' since everything is already owned by the government.
But even if I ignore that, it's still not socialism until the taxes are used to promote the general welfare. For example, taxation occurs under feudalism too.
So taxes used to promote a military isn't socialism?
Because taxation being socialistic would have to benefit those actually paying the taxes. Not Haiti, Zaire, Iran, Iraq.......that list goes on and on and on........ the banks and damn sure not IsNtReal.So, two here think it's not socialism?
How would you explain that?
Seriously.
I voted no, but only because your wording left me unable to vote yes.
First, there is the dictionary definition of socialism that doesn't even require 'taxation' since everything is already owned by the government.
But even if I ignore that, it's still not socialism until the taxes are used to promote the general welfare. For example, taxation occurs under feudalism too.
So taxes used to promote a military isn't socialism?
That qualifies as promoting the general welfare. Few things undermine the 'general welfare' quite like an invading army.
I voted no, but only because your wording left me unable to vote yes.
First, there is the dictionary definition of socialism that doesn't even require 'taxation' since everything is already owned by the government.
But even if I ignore that, it's still not socialism until the taxes are used to promote the general welfare. For example, taxation occurs under feudalism too.
So taxes used to promote a military isn't socialism?
Militias are a tried and tested failure.
guys with guns are no match for trained soldiers.
Because taxation being socialistic would have to benefit those actually paying the taxes. Not Haiti, Zaire, Iran, Iraq.......that list goes on and on and on........ the banks and damn sure not IsNtReal.So, two here think it's not socialism?
How would you explain that?
Seriously.
SO.
Take every nickel you idiots pay in and keep it all at home. EVERY NICKEL and use it only within the US.No more corporate subsidies, no more bailouts. Your money used to benefit YOU.
Socialism.
Ya know. Schools,libraries, free internet, new infrastructure, health care, small business loans. All of the things murkins hate.
That qualifies as promoting the general welfare. Few things undermine the 'general welfare' quite like an invading army.
Soo..
I'm guessing you are saying that's socialism.
Nothing gets by you.