Is Snopes a Left-Wing Mouthpiece?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Soros owns an interest in Snopes. I should check Snopes to see if thats true
 
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.
 
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.
Maybe not a DNC sock, but a Soros sock for sure. He pumps money into both.
 
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.


Oh so if I DONT make fun of your lunacy that means its MORE ridiculous?

Reverse psychology level 3rd grade
 
could be the Right gives Snopes more to check out than the Left does, and more often than not proves the Right is wrong.

nah, that could never happen.
 
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.

The more people disagree with you, the more correct you must be, huh? That's a lovely piece of batshit.

Can you give us an example of Snopes being inaccurate in a political way? Or is this just more vague insinuation backed by exactly dick?
 
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.

The more people disagree with you, the more correct you must be, huh? That's a lovely piece of batshit.

Can you give us an example of Snopes being inaccurate in a political way? Or is this just more vague insinuation backed by exactly dick?
that's the problem, Lack of dick!
 
They certainly seem to be biased that way.
Absolutely. The founders are far left. You didn't know that?

Meet "snopes".
David and Barbara Mikkelson.
They have no experience, no qualifications, no research teams - it's a husband and wife team and they are highly over rated. imo.


I have to remove that photo - they look so satisfied to be getting away with this scam. No press for them.


One of them is supposedly a Canadian citizen - both are said to be far left socialists - Obama puppets - there were rumors that George Soros funded them. If you investigate some of their fact checking you'll find they have claimed true stories to be false and false to be true. Obama must be so proud. I would never use their website for fact checking. Ever.
 
Last edited:
Well the lefties are manning their bunkers on this one. The more they scream anything down, the more veracity you know the subject at hand possesses. To me the OP title is simply a muse. It shoud be obvious to anyone who thinks, that Snopes is a DNC sock.
Maybe not a DNC sock, but a Soros sock for sure. He pumps money into both.

And your evidence of that is......jack shit. Zilch. Nada. Nothing.

As is so typical among many conservatives, your assessment of a sources credibility is based solely on whether or not it agrees with you. And you'll happily imagine up any excuse to ignore a source that doesn't.

Even when you have zero evidence to support your imagination. Its the same logic used by birthers.
 
Is Snopes.com infallible

Millions of Americans, including national leaders, who rely on the popular online hoax-buster [URL='http://snopes.com/']Snopes.com as the ultimate authority in separating truth from fiction, may be surprised to learn that behind the Wizard’s curtain, is just a husband and wife doing research on their own.

In fact, Snopes, routinely cited by many as the final word on both frivolous and important stories, is not the well-staffed think tank of researchers, journalists and computer hacks one might expect – but rather, the work of David and Barbara Mikkelson, living in a Los Angeles suburb.

And though Snopes arguably deserves the popularity it has accrued over the years, many have come to regard the site as virtually infallible – which it definitely is not, say critics. Yet today, major news organizations such as the Associated Press and MSNBC cite Snopes as a definitive source for determining accuracy in suspicious stories. Six to 8 million viewers visit the site monthly. National Review Online calls Snopes “indispensable.”

In fact, as WND has reported, a U.S. senator recently dismissed an issue as significant as determining the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president based on the word of Snopes.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2009/03/91196/#hqKEkKPC2ahXC15I.99 [/URL]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top