Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Good response!Losing to a minor country a fraction of their size and you post this LOL military genius you are not.
What a moronic question.
Could it be actually true in a strategic sense?
Or is it redundant to speculate considering that any major conflict will soon turn to a nuclear war?
Still, the question should be asked for a war that is restricted to only conventional weapons.
I've placed this topic here in Military in hopes of a serious discussion that doesn't belong in the Badlands. Moderator cooperation would be appreciated.
No.Has Russia invaded a NATO country yet? ...
America applied all the might it dared to apply against Russia in Syria, and Russia won a tactical victory in that the world focused on the fact that Russia is an invited ally and America was involved in aggression against Syria.The West allowed Russia to take over Syria, both sides have much to gain eliminating terrorism in the world ...
We won't know until some Nato nation attacks Russia or vice versa. And fwiw, it turns out that exceptions to honouring article are possible for all concerned if any attack Russia. It's more likely the US would sit out a war between Russia and Poland. America is fully aware that it's interference will lead to a nuclear war. Military strategists are almost unanimous on America's inability to wage war against Russia.but frankly, it looks like Russia is no match for Turkey and/or Israel, and that's without USA direct intervention ...
In fact, article 5 doesn't suggest that all hell will break loose. You need to think it through without consideration of Nato.We don't want WWIII ... so we're tip-toeing around The Ukraine ... the first Russia tank crossing into Lithuania and all hell breaks lose ... all of Europe loses ...
It's likely to be moronic to ask Christians in America, on account of prophesy and the secured feelings of righteousness among them.What a moronic question.
Seriously my friend, America is frantically working to develop hypersonic missile technology.Is Russia the world's leading military power? It takes a bit more than just having a lot of outdated equipment available to throw out as cannon fodder.
Russia's attempts to get others to believe are strictly limited to demonstrations of their capability. They make no claims beyond that.Sorry, but they aren't as technically advanced militarily as they try to get others to believe.
The Ukraine is not. It has been destroyed by Russia with impunity. The only part of the Ukraine that still exists is depending on Russia observing limitations.Want examples? If they are so great, then why is Ukraine still holding their own against them?
Hit and run military posing a--hole!Losing to a minor country a fraction of their size and you post this LOL military genius you are not.
No. Your question was moronic. Russia barely clings on to first world status. Its military operations are a disaster. Its military leadership is very suspect. Its soldiers are dying at an alarming rate.It's likely to be moronic to ask Christians in America, on account of prophesy and the secured feelings of righteousness among them.
But there's always going to be the real world!
To people like you it's an annoying question on account of your secure feelings that America could never lose a war.
Most optimistic estimates are that Nato mercenaries and the few remaining Ukrainians are dying 5 to 1 against Russians and their allies.No. Your question was moronic. Russia barely clings on to first world status. Its military operations are a disaster. Its military leadership is very suspect. Its soldiers are dying at an alarming rate.
View attachment 814133
Could it be actually true in a strategic sense?
Or is it redundant to speculate considering that any major conflict will soon turn to a nuclear war?
Still, the question should be asked for a war that is restricted to only conventional weapons.
I've placed this topic here in Military in hopes of a serious discussion that doesn't belong in the Badlands. Moderator cooperation would be appreciated.
That's a crude way of saying that America's rubber is meeting the road, when compared to Russia's demonstrated capabilities.Potatohead has turned the US military in a bunch a purse swingers so we are not even in the count any more.
That's a crude way of saying that America's rubber is meeting the road, when compared to Russia's demonstrated capabilities.
That's the sort of bravado that's going to be a confidence builder for Americans who would rather not get informed.Russia couldn't defeat a 7th rate military.
So no. They aren't
The slaughter of the UKraine's first and second army and the current destruction of it's third, as Russia begins its offensive. specificallyWhat demonstrated capabilities?
Be specific.
That's the sort of bravado that's going to be a confidence builder for Americans who would rather not get informed.
It's all welcome here on this topic!
The slaughter of the UKraine's first and second army and the current destruction of it's third, as Russia begins its offensive. specifically
There are rules still being observed that dictate that Russia won't mount a Blitzkreif style offensive on the Ukraine by beating the civilian population into submission due to regular warfare.If the Russians have done what you claim then they could simply take over the country.
That hasn't happened so what you claim is a lie.
