Is KellyAnne Conway correct? That MLKJr. wouldve opposed impeaching this White President?

[IM2]

MLK Negro was a Socialist so he would have hated Trump. Like all the dumbass Democrat Negros he would have been suffering from TDS.

If King had lived, there would have been no trump presidency and old white men like you would quietly be put to pasture.

If King had lived then he would have judged President Trump, by the content of his character. Which means Dr. King would not join Black America to play, pretend, about what we see Trump doing to uplift Black people.

If Dr. King had lived, since he attended an HBCU, then he would be happy that President Trump made a promise to help HBCU thrive then he signed a law giving $250-million/year to those schools.

Wrong. You see if King had lived, the course of events change in America. Now since he was on his way to propose economic solutions for blacks, he would have implemented national boycotts of racist companies and as he was broadening his base of support, he may have ended up becoming the first black president, then we would have had the white backlash in 1980 if Kings poverty program failed.

There would be no trump presidency today.

Those like you repeat that one sentence, but King would not be fooled by trump. trump has done nothing to uplift us. trump had to sign that law, it was not an issue he has been promoting. King would have been very concerned and opposed to trumps gutting civil rights and certainly he would have had a few words for trump picking judges that disagree with Brown v. Board.

Since you will never be satisfied, evolution of our nation can not occur. Revolution is the answer. You have the greatest advantage in human history. Globalists have made white people scared shitless about offending black people in any way. You have people form all groups on your side and the added benefit of a percentage of people who have grudges not only against you but of their own who screwed them over. They will give you leeway for a period of time until they join in on their side. This to get even as people on the side they have chosen need to suffer first to prove allegiances. We have peaked out IM 2. Taxes will need to go past the level of demarcation which will lead to violence or not caring about doing a damn thing to live to satisfy you. Remember.....when tyranny is the law, revolution is the order!

I will be satisfied when racism by whites is gone. Until THAT happens evolution of our nation cannot occur. Globalists don't exist. No you have not peaked out and taxes don't have to be raised. Racism has cost this nation money and until those like you understand that, you'll post this type of silly drivel.

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

 

[IM2]

Either party doesn't do it. There is one party who is correct about Dr. King, then we have the republicans. It's real simple, had you been alive and paid attention to King, you know he was no conservative and you know he would oppose trump. The fact he was calling on government to do what's right eliminates any claim of conservatism.

And you don't watch the right kind of "news"

Dems had MLK weighing in on the impeachment.. They had him crusading for CC/GW... It was just as disgusting when Kellyanne does it...

You have no proof that he would oppose Trump... After all, he did suck up to LBJ didn't he???

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

No it wouldn't. You really need to unlearn your radicalization.

 

[IM2]

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.

Amen Bro.. And that's why the nation CELEBRATES MLK day.. Unfortunately, there's pitifully few people like you who CARE about the real meanings of nearly ANY Holiday today.... There's a epidemic of derangement going on -- so NOTHING gets crafted as real solutions...

You don't want a solution and you really didn't know what king stood for. At the end of his life he was planning to petition the government to provide money to help rebuild black communities.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. - Get Our Check



Whites have not progressed without government help. Asians mobility increased in the last 35 years because a large number of them got reparations. So what king was saying is that since the government provided economic development for whites, it should do so for blacks. Had he lived, then at age 90 he could do exactly what katsteve stated because his economic plan would have been implemented. This you miss as you live in the white delusion of "we made it by ourselves so why can't you."

I have a solution and I have it on paper. It is a 20 year plan whereby blacks rebuild black communities. But it will require the government to pay money. Those like you would oppose such a plan because your mentality is not rooted in reality

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

You don't know shit ...

Well, I do know that in my 5 weeks on USM so far, I've yet to post flagrant remarks to you.


skinny: Proceed with caution.

So when you learn more than that one sentence white racists use to defend their racism we can talk.

I invited you to talk about many sentences I have posted about Trump's several deeds which exclusively uplifted Black people. You have refused to.

I invited you to talk about links that you posted. But you refuse to. Then even when I start to list your link's issues here, one at a time to discuss --- your reply is that I should learn more than that one sentence white racists use to defend their racism

lol

I think you and I both can see the irrationality reeking here.

And you are incorrect, according to my posts. I cited more than a couple of instances, to deny false claims about Trump being a racist toward negros.

And when I see how you approached the truth about Trump and the HBCU funding ---with your article that abandon the facts from May 2017-today--- then I can't wait to see if you will ever show that you respect your own argument enough to discuss your claim about 150 racist judges appointed to federal benches and him Taking white supremacist groups off the terrorist watch list and him creating a category called black identity extremists that designates black protest groups as terrorists and him Gutting civil rights

You refuse to use logic re President Trump, but you make sure that you're using the Dem's playbook. And I really do hope you desire a discussion between us ---so I can expose that playboo, page by page, when it comes to veracity of Trump not being racist toward Negroid people.

 

[Flash]

Instead of having a holiday named after that commie piece of shit asshole MLK Negro we should have one recognizing the brave patriotic Americans that led the Confederacy's rebellion against the oppressive Libtard Union shitheads.

If not that at least a holiday recognizing the contribution of Eugene Stoner. He is a much greater American hero than that MLK Negro.

 

[22lcidw]

MLK Negro was a Socialist so he would have hated Trump. Like all the dumbass Democrat Negros he would have been suffering from TDS.

If King had lived, there would have been no trump presidency and old white men like you would quietly be put to pasture.

If King had lived then he would have judged President Trump, by the content of his character. Which means Dr. King would not join Black America to play, pretend, about what we see Trump doing to uplift Black people.

If Dr. King had lived, since he attended an HBCU, then he would be happy that President Trump made a promise to help HBCU thrive then he signed a law giving $250-million/year to those schools.

Wrong. You see if King had lived, the course of events change in America. Now since he was on his way to propose economic solutions for blacks, he would have implemented national boycotts of racist companies and as he was broadening his base of support, he may have ended up becoming the first black president, then we would have had the white backlash in 1980 if Kings poverty program failed.

There would be no trump presidency today.

Those like you repeat that one sentence, but King would not be fooled by trump. trump has done nothing to uplift us. trump had to sign that law, it was not an issue he has been promoting. King would have been very concerned and opposed to trumps gutting civil rights and certainly he would have had a few words for trump picking judges that disagree with Brown v. Board.

Since you will never be satisfied, evolution of our nation can not occur. Revolution is the answer. You have the greatest advantage in human history. Globalists have made white people scared shitless about offending black people in any way. You have people form all groups on your side and the added benefit of a percentage of people who have grudges not only against you but of their own who screwed them over. They will give you leeway for a period of time until they join in on their side. This to get even as people on the side they have chosen need to suffer first to prove allegiances. We have peaked out IM 2. Taxes will need to go past the level of demarcation which will lead to violence or not caring about doing a damn thing to live to satisfy you. Remember.....when tyranny is the law, revolution is the order!

I will be satisfied when racism by whites is gone. Until THAT happens evolution of our nation cannot occur. Globalists don't exist. No you have not peaked out and taxes don't have to be raised. Racism has cost this nation money and until those like you understand that, you'll post this type of silly drivel.

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

I thank gaia everyday for my non globalist Asian made superior products. Imagine having to keep purchasing the most technical products made here by our PC and quota driven standards. Thank You Japan. Thank You South Korea. Thank You China. Thank You Southeast Asia. You have our eternal thanks for providing comforts despite our social agenda insanity run amok.I know in a couple of decades you won't really need us. But the younger ones will pay that price big time. We will see how noble they are then.

 

[rightwinger]

Yea, MLK would have supported Trump

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

Instead of having a holiday named after that commie piece of shit asshole MLK Negro we should have one recognizing the brave patriotic Americans that led the Confederacy's rebellion...

Or ... we could have one to recognize any of your great, great, great grandmothers. Yes. The ones who used to sneak out of the big house, late night, and head down to the slave quarters to find some negro stud to take out into the cornfields to force him to pump big steam deep into her loins. You voting for that holiday?

 

[Flash]

Instead of having a holiday named after that commie piece of shit asshole MLK Negro we should have one recognizing the brave patriotic Americans that led the Confederacy's rebellion...

Or ... we could have one to recognize any of your great, great, great grandmothers. Yes. The ones who used to sneak out of the big house, late night, and head down to the slave quarters to find some negro stud to take her out into the cornfields to pump big steam deep into her loins. You voting for that holiday?

My great great grandfather fought for the 9th Florida Regiment at the Battle of Olustee.

That is when the Union filth tried to invade Florida and kill Floridians and destroy Florida homes and farms. The Union scum sent their neggras. The 54th Colored Regiment. You know, the assholes that were depicted in the movie Glory.

They got their sorry black asses kicked really bad.

But to address your point. My great grandmother was a Seminole Indian. Seminoles had integrated many runaway Negro slaves into their population. Good chance I am part neggra so in a convoluted way you may correct.

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

I will be satisfied when racism by whites is gone.

Good luck with that one.

If we've learned nothing else, it is that as long as we awake each morning knowing that this is a White-controlled nation, then Racism will not be going away. So it then becomes about how negros need to get in, where they fit in, and document all proofs where they are illegally denied the chance to do so.

Documentation = $$$ @ the courthouse. Because no racist in the world, wants to have to give a negro his $$$ at the courthouse.

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

Instead of having a holiday named after that commie piece of shit asshole MLK Negro we should have one recognizing the brave patriotic Americans that led the Confederacy's rebellion...

Or ... we could have one to recognize any of your great, great, great grandmothers. Yes. The ones who used to sneak out of the big house, late night, and head down to the slave quarters to find some negro stud to take her out into the cornfields to pump big steam deep into her loins. You voting for that holiday?

My great great grandfather fought for the 9th Florida Regiment at the Battle of Olustee.

That is when the Union filth tried to invade Florida and kill Floridians and destroy Florida homes and farms. The Union scum sent their neggras. The 54th Colored Regiment. You know, the assholes that were depicted in the movie Glory.

They got their sorry black asses kicked really bad.

But to address your point. My great grandmother was a Seminole Indian. Seminoles had integrated many runaway Negro slaves into their population. Good chance I am part neggra so in a convoluted way you may correct.

ROFL

 

[Jitss617]

Kellyanne Conway Says MLK Would Oppose Trump Impeachment

What say you, Dems?

Mlk got a pay load from the left to switch ideology.. so it would depend who was paying more

 

[OldLady]

Either party doesn't do it. There is one party who is correct about Dr. King, then we have the republicans. It's real simple, had you been alive and paid attention to King, you know he was no conservative and you know he would oppose trump. The fact he was calling on government to do what's right eliminates any claim of conservatism.

And you don't watch the right kind of "news"

Dems had MLK weighing in on the impeachment.. They had him crusading for CC/GW... It was just as disgusting when Kellyanne does it...

You have no proof that he would oppose Trump... After all, he did suck up to LBJ didn't he???

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team..
Why is that? You haven't bought the bullshit that all Dems are atheist demons, have you? It's not true.

 

[flacaltenn]

And you don't watch the right kind of "news"

Dems had MLK weighing in on the impeachment.. They had him crusading for CC/GW... It was just as disgusting when Kellyanne does it...

You have no proof that he would oppose Trump... After all, he did suck up to LBJ didn't he???

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

No it wouldn't. You really need to unlearn your radicalization.

You're just naive if you think Dr. King could be a "secular humanist" to fit into today's Dem Party... Having prayer breakfasts not ONCE a year but maybe once a week would be VERY PROBLEMATIC to your political clan today...

Because it removes one of their LARGEST WEDGE ISSUES... And all those "bible thumping Christians" would no longer be just deplorable Repubs....

Having a REVEREND as president?? According to the official diversity scoring guide, (LOL ---I stole a copy) his NEGATIVE points on JUST that would put him out before Cory Booker in the primaries...

 

[flacaltenn]

And you don't watch the right kind of "news"

Dems had MLK weighing in on the impeachment.. They had him crusading for CC/GW... It was just as disgusting when Kellyanne does it...

You have no proof that he would oppose Trump... After all, he did suck up to LBJ didn't he???

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team..
Why is that? You haven't bought the bullshit that all Dems are atheist demons, have you? It's not true.

See my post above... Atheist demons no... But RELIANT on that giant "bible thumping" wedge that every top Dem has used one way or another??? Of course they are using it..... Couldn't KEEP that wedge of YOURS and welcome a reverend as President and leader of their party today...

 

[Crepitus]

Is KellyAnne Conway correct?

Never has been, never will be.

 

[OldLady]

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team..
Why is that? You haven't bought the bullshit that all Dems are atheist demons, have you? It's not true.

See my post above... Atheist demons no... But RELIANT on that giant "bible thumping" wedge that every top Dem has used one way or another??? Of course they are using it..... Couldn't KEEP that wedge of YOURS and welcome a reverend as President and leader of their party today...

I don't remember MLK using his pulpit to damn and ostracize homosexuals and violate the civil laws regarding it. I don't remember MLK trying to put Christian iconography in front of state houses, like monuments of the 10 Commandments. You are wrong about Democrats. They are religious/not religious just like the Repubs. Some are some aren't. You've been reading here too long if you think the hateful stuff a few posters here spew is the truth Out There.

And it's not my party.

 

[IM2]

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

No it wouldn't. You really need to unlearn your radicalization.

You're just naive if you think Dr. King could be a "secular humanist" to fit into today's Dem Party... Having prayer breakfasts not ONCE a year but maybe once a week would be VERY PROBLEMATIC to your political clan today...

Because it removes one of their LARGEST WEDGE ISSUES... And all those "bible thumping Christians" would no longer be just deplorable Repubs....

Having a REVEREND as president?? According to the official diversity scoring guide, (LOL ---I stole a copy) his NEGATIVE points on JUST that would put him out before Cory Booker in the primaries...

Fool, every democrat is not a secular humanist and when King lived there was word going around in 1968 that King might possibly be Kennedys running mate. You don't seem to understand the difference in the way liberals and conservatives see God. The conservative god is a draconian angry god waiting to punish everyone for sin. He's the god who says starve if you don't work. Rev. Jackson and Rev Sharpton have ran for president in the democratic party and Rev. William Barber is a leader in the Democratic party.

You really need not clown diversity then lie about how you aren't a racist. Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh son, because you are all the way wrong.

 

[IM2]

Unlike you, I watch the truth. Dems were right. The imaginary King those like you created is not Dr. King. The real Dr. King would have opposed trump. And your lack of knowledge about King has you saying he sucked up to LBJ instead of he made demands that LBJ was forced to deal with.

Just do us all a favor and keep Dr. Kings name out your mouth until you really learn about him.

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team..
Why is that? You haven't bought the bullshit that all Dems are atheist demons, have you? It's not true.

See my post above... Atheist demons no... But RELIANT on that giant "bible thumping" wedge that every top Dem has used one way or another??? Of course they are using it..... Couldn't KEEP that wedge of YOURS and welcome a reverend as President and leader of their party today...

There is no wedge. There is an opposition to right wing theology.

 

[22lcidw]

Of course what MLK would think of the Trump circus today is only speculation, but if he were still living, at 90+ years of age, my guess would be that he would not concern himself so much with Trumps business and the non partisan, self serving circus that American politics have become, and focus more on encouraging the succesful segment of the black population to work together with the less fortunate segment of the black population to rebuild predominately black communities through a system of self reliance and self help, much like the NOI has advocated for many generations, and you see the same approach in predominantly Asian communities. They take care of themselves.
First and foremost.

I would hope that he would look back and recognize that along with his work to obtain the basic rights of citizenship, that he should have done more to encourage economic growth based more on community redevelopment from within, than seeking a utopian society where we all reach across the aisles to join hands.

That did very little to build economic wealth in predominantly black communities. In fact, it hurt more than it helped, IMO.

My own father knew MLK and admired him as well as marched with him, but I also recall him saying to me as a kid:

"We live in a capitalistic society, and if he does not integrate building wealth, ON OUR OWN into his message, we will have marched for nothing"

JMO.

If he had lived, I do think he would have helped create the economic development you say is needed today. It stands to reason that many things would be different and it may have been King instead of Obama who would have been the first black president in 1972 and would have served 2 terms and Reagan very well may not have been able to rise into prominence which means this current type of "conservatism" probably would not have taken hold. That would mean we'd not be talking about a president trump.

But looking at what actually happened, he probably would have done better to adopt Malcolm X's economic nationalism. Your opinion is correct in this regard.

As long as this alternate scenario got rid of Nixon faster -- I'm all for it...

BTW -- His religious faith and convictions TODAY would be a real conundrum for the Dem team.. Don't think that would fly very well...

No it wouldn't. You really need to unlearn your radicalization.

You're just naive if you think Dr. King could be a "secular humanist" to fit into today's Dem Party... Having prayer breakfasts not ONCE a year but maybe once a week would be VERY PROBLEMATIC to your political clan today...

Because it removes one of their LARGEST WEDGE ISSUES... And all those "bible thumping Christians" would no longer be just deplorable Repubs....

Having a REVEREND as president?? According to the official diversity scoring guide, (LOL ---I stole a copy) his NEGATIVE points on JUST that would put him out before Cory Booker in the primaries...

Fool, every democrat is not a secular humanist and when King lived there was word going around in 1968 that King might possibly be Kennedys running mate. You don't seem to understand the difference in the way liberals and conservatives see God. The conservative god is a draconian angry god waiting to punish everyone for sin. He's the god who says starve if you don't work. Rev. Jackson and Rev Sharpton have ran for president in the democratic party and Rev. William Barber is a leader in the Democratic party.

You really need not clown diversity then lie about how you aren't a racist. Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh son, because you are all the way wrong.

There is a difference between an angry god and a god who allows every vice there is to its maximum detriment. Especially when people are taxed for it. Biblical scripture tells you what happens. Lets face it we don't need many reasons to have wars. And all of those vices to the max, cause them.