If you love America stay home

[Mac1958]

Self-inflicted wound.

 

[mudwhistle]

i laugh at all the snowflakes calling for an NFL boycott

I laugh at all of the silly snowflakes calling for a boycott because they don't want to hear a speech by Milo.

 

[mudwhistle]

Self-inflicted wound.

Aren't liberals fun????

 

[PredFan]

Veterans defend Kaepernick on social media - CNN

Really? A majority of us veterans think he's an ignorant jackass. He has the right to do it, but we have a right to point out that he's an idiot.

There are millions of ignorant socialist VETERANS like you and your ilk.

You are confused and ignorant. Sucks to be you.

And many more veterans like myself believe he's just an idiot.

 

[PredFan]

Veterans defend Kaepernick on social media - CNN

Really? A majority of us veterans think he's an ignorant jackass. He has the right to do it, but we have a right to point out that he's an idiot.

There are millions of ignorant socialist VETERANS like you and your ilk.

You are confused and ignorant. Sucks to be you.

But why would any veteran want to show support for a racist bigot who hates the country that made him rich and famous?

Most don't. It's just a hashtag and any idiot can make one.

 

[frigidweirdo]

It doesn't matter what YOU think their beliefs are based on.

99% of the America right now just accepts what they're told by someone or other. The fact that you bring up "corrupt media" is ironic because you basically got some guy to come along and stick that in your head. Like in Monty Python's The Life of Brian. "You're all individuals" "Yes, we're all individuals" they all say robotically.

Yes, blacks have been told their whole lives that whites hate them, then you come on forums like this and find plenty of whites who hate blacks. Oh, what a fucking surprise.

So you figure that a blanket condemnation of the country as a whole is due because of a few assholes?
Isn't that not only pigheaded, childish, but racist as well?
Maybe I should have just condemned all of Germany when I lived there because a few of them are ignorant Nazis.

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

 

[mudwhistle]

So you figure that a blanket condemnation of the country as a whole is due because of a few assholes?
Isn't that not only pigheaded, childish, but racist as well?
Maybe I should have just condemned all of Germany when I lived there because a few of them are ignorant Nazis.

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

The biggest threat to the world is the socialist world movement. The second biggest threat is Islam.

They are working together to bring down the West.

Islam controls the Middle East, China controls the far East, and Socialists want to control the West.

 

[mudwhistle]

So you figure that a blanket condemnation of the country as a whole is due because of a few assholes?
Isn't that not only pigheaded, childish, but racist as well?
Maybe I should have just condemned all of Germany when I lived there because a few of them are ignorant Nazis.

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

More than 10% of all Muslims are radical Muslims. A large percentage of them are willing to kill over their religion. Shiites under age 30 are willing to kill themselves to get 72 virgins when they reach Heaven. This comes from the fact that most of them are unable to marry until they reach 30. This causes DSB (DEADLY SPERM BUILDUP) Those rags be crazy if they don't get any till 30.

 

[Papageorgio]

View attachment 151371

"That is Colin Kaepernick, and he's at 49ers camp wearing socks that depict little piggies wearing police hats."

Kaepernick wore police pig socks at 49ers camp

And?

Anti-America, Anti-National Anthem, Anti-law enforcement...and cocksuckers like you will defend him until the end...because you agree 100%.

How am I anti-American?

Oh, yeah, I'm anti-American because I don't agree with you. Oh, wow.

And you accuse Ray that he is “sticking his head in the sand” because he doesn’t agree with you.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

The biggest threat to the world is the socialist world movement. The second biggest threat is Islam.

They are working together to bring down the West.

Islam controls the Middle East, China controls the far East, and Socialists want to control the West.

Give me a break.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

More than 10% of all Muslims are radical Muslims. A large percentage of them are willing to kill over their religion. Shiites under age 30 are willing to kill themselves to get 72 virgins when they reach Heaven. This comes from the fact that most of them are unable to marry until they reach 30. This causes DSB (DEADLY SPERM BUILDUP) Those rags be crazy if they don't get any till 30.

Sure they are, and you can prove this... no, wait, you can't and you won't, but you'll still spout the same old crap every day.

 

[mudwhistle]

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

More than 10% of all Muslims are radical Muslims. A large percentage of them are willing to kill over their religion. Shiites under age 30 are willing to kill themselves to get 72 virgins when they reach Heaven. This comes from the fact that most of them are unable to marry until they reach 30. This causes DSB (DEADLY SPERM BUILDUP) Those rags be crazy if they don't get any till 30.

Sure they are, and you can prove this... no, wait, you can't and you won't, but you'll still spout the same old crap every day.

1. Dissemination of a subculture of martyrdom. As pointed out by Gill[10], the concept of a "subculture of martyrdom" refers to a set of beliefs and symbolic resources that have been extracted from the political culture or the religion that insurgent groups who perpetrate suicide attacks share with a constituent community. These beliefs and symbolic resources are adapted in order to build a moral interpretation of suicide attacks as a legitimate and heroic sacrifice in favour of a certain community or social collective, or as a response to a sacred obligation (in the case of suicide violence promoted by religious groups). Obviously, the spreading of a subculture of martyrdom is frequently connected with religious indoctrination and generally speaking should be understood as the result of several activities developed to attain that goal: proselytizing, preaching, charismatic leadership, propaganda, intensive indoctrination of future suicide bombers, etc.[11] The subculture of martyrdom that promotes jihadi suicide violence adds two frequent and strong motivations for "martyrdom operations": as a way of atoning for the previous sins, or as an action that would be compensated with a rewards after death and/or some benefits to the suicide bomber's family in life (from cash bonuses to free apartments.[12]Suicide Terrorism as a Tool of Insurgency Campaigns: Functions, Risk Factors, and Countermeasures | Corte | Perspectives on Terrorism

Unlike Sunni Islam, Shi`a theology is famous for promoting a cult of martyrdom—a discursive-mythical paradigm that is symbolically rooted in the multifaceted narrative of the self-sacrifice of the Prophet Muhammad’s beloved grandson, Husayn, who is believed to have died a “noble” death at the plains of Karbala at the hands of the “evil” army of Caliph Yazid in 680 AD. A short history of suicide bombing | AOAV


However, suicide attacks aren't exclusive to the Shi'
The rise of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia thru AL Qaeda led to suicide attacks on 911.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

More than 10% of all Muslims are radical Muslims. A large percentage of them are willing to kill over their religion. Shiites under age 30 are willing to kill themselves to get 72 virgins when they reach Heaven. This comes from the fact that most of them are unable to marry until they reach 30. This causes DSB (DEADLY SPERM BUILDUP) Those rags be crazy if they don't get any till 30.

Sure they are, and you can prove this... no, wait, you can't and you won't, but you'll still spout the same old crap every day.

1. Dissemination of a subculture of martyrdom. As pointed out by Gill[10], the concept of a "subculture of martyrdom" refers to a set of beliefs and symbolic resources that have been extracted from the political culture or the religion that insurgent groups who perpetrate suicide attacks share with a constituent community. These beliefs and symbolic resources are adapted in order to build a moral interpretation of suicide attacks as a legitimate and heroic sacrifice in favour of a certain community or social collective, or as a response to a sacred obligation (in the case of suicide violence promoted by religious groups). Obviously, the spreading of a subculture of martyrdom is frequently connected with religious indoctrination and generally speaking should be understood as the result of several activities developed to attain that goal: proselytizing, preaching, charismatic leadership, propaganda, intensive indoctrination of future suicide bombers, etc.[11] The subculture of martyrdom that promotes jihadi suicide violence adds two frequent and strong motivations for "martyrdom operations": as a way of atoning for the previous sins, or as an action that would be compensated with a rewards after death and/or some benefits to the suicide bomber's family in life (from cash bonuses to free apartments.[12]Suicide Terrorism as a Tool of Insurgency Campaigns: Functions, Risk Factors, and Countermeasures | Corte | Perspectives on Terrorism

Unlike Sunni Islam, Shi`a theology is famous for promoting a cult of martyrdom—a discursive-mythical paradigm that is symbolically rooted in the multifaceted narrative of the self-sacrifice of the Prophet Muhammad’s beloved grandson, Husayn, who is believed to have died a “noble” death at the plains of Karbala at the hands of the “evil” army of Caliph Yazid in 680 AD. A short history of suicide bombing | AOAV


However, suicide attacks aren't exclusive to the Shi'
The rise of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia thru AL Qaeda led to suicide attacks on 911.

And what is the point you are making?

The fact that countries can compete against countries like the US with Jihad, shows why poorer Muslim countries use Jihad.

When the British went into Afghanistan, they got kicked out and the ONLY way the Afghans could find to defeat the British was with Jihad, because they didn't have the weaponry or training to compete with the trained British soldiers. So, they get their troops to be devoted to their religion, and as such make much better soldiers.

If you go round fucking with weaker oil rich countries because you think it'll be easy to pick on then, then you get kicked in the balls by them, don't go around complaining. The US caused the rise of Jihad, caused many Muslims to become radicalized. The US WANTED this and got it.

 

[mudwhistle]

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

The right is "smart" enough to be able to ignore most things that aren't convenient to their narrative, and pretend like everything works in their favor.

Most of the world knows that the US is the biggest threat to global security right now. The right in the US has "cowboy 'n' injun" syndrome, where the Cowboys were the good guys committing genocide and the injuns were the bad guys protecting their homelands from invasion.

Well, yes, the US isn't willing to kill people for just religious reasons, the US requires there to be oil or something similar. Are you saying killing for religion is worse than killing for oil?

Yes, if 10% of the Muslims population were suicidal, it would cause us a massive problem, but clearly 10% aren't suicidal, in fact the number is probably closer to 0.0001%. But then people like you will ignore this math and pretend that Muslims are much more of a threat than the US govt.

Without the US govt extremist Islam wouldn't have been much of an issue today. But the US lost its common enemy in 1990 and didn't know what to do. So you make problems knowing full well that Muslims would fight back, and you got your wish, instability, terrorism, reasons to take people's rights away and so you can elect "strong" leaders who talk about killing people. You can't get enough of this fucking bullshit.

More than 10% of all Muslims are radical Muslims. A large percentage of them are willing to kill over their religion. Shiites under age 30 are willing to kill themselves to get 72 virgins when they reach Heaven. This comes from the fact that most of them are unable to marry until they reach 30. This causes DSB (DEADLY SPERM BUILDUP) Those rags be crazy if they don't get any till 30.

Sure they are, and you can prove this... no, wait, you can't and you won't, but you'll still spout the same old crap every day.

1. Dissemination of a subculture of martyrdom. As pointed out by Gill[10], the concept of a "subculture of martyrdom" refers to a set of beliefs and symbolic resources that have been extracted from the political culture or the religion that insurgent groups who perpetrate suicide attacks share with a constituent community. These beliefs and symbolic resources are adapted in order to build a moral interpretation of suicide attacks as a legitimate and heroic sacrifice in favour of a certain community or social collective, or as a response to a sacred obligation (in the case of suicide violence promoted by religious groups). Obviously, the spreading of a subculture of martyrdom is frequently connected with religious indoctrination and generally speaking should be understood as the result of several activities developed to attain that goal: proselytizing, preaching, charismatic leadership, propaganda, intensive indoctrination of future suicide bombers, etc.[11] The subculture of martyrdom that promotes jihadi suicide violence adds two frequent and strong motivations for "martyrdom operations": as a way of atoning for the previous sins, or as an action that would be compensated with a rewards after death and/or some benefits to the suicide bomber's family in life (from cash bonuses to free apartments.[12]Suicide Terrorism as a Tool of Insurgency Campaigns: Functions, Risk Factors, and Countermeasures | Corte | Perspectives on Terrorism

Unlike Sunni Islam, Shi`a theology is famous for promoting a cult of martyrdom—a discursive-mythical paradigm that is symbolically rooted in the multifaceted narrative of the self-sacrifice of the Prophet Muhammad’s beloved grandson, Husayn, who is believed to have died a “noble” death at the plains of Karbala at the hands of the “evil” army of Caliph Yazid in 680 AD. A short history of suicide bombing | AOAV


However, suicide attacks aren't exclusive to the Shi'
The rise of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia thru AL Qaeda led to suicide attacks on 911.

And what is the point you are making?

The fact that countries can compete against countries like the US with Jihad, shows why poorer Muslim countries use Jihad.

When the British went into Afghanistan, they got kicked out and the ONLY way the Afghans could find to defeat the British was with Jihad, because they didn't have the weaponry or training to compete with the trained British soldiers. So, they get their troops to be devoted to their religion, and as such make much better soldiers.

If you go round fucking with weaker oil rich countries because you think it'll be easy to pick on then, then you get kicked in the balls by them, don't go around complaining. The US caused the rise of Jihad, caused many Muslims to become radicalized. The US WANTED this and got it.

You asked me to prove it...so I proved it.
The US as a whole didn't want it. It is possible that the warmongering Establishment insiders in Washington wanted it. I know Hillary and Obama wanted it.

 

[Issa]

It doesn't matter what YOU think their beliefs are based on.

99% of the America right now just accepts what they're told by someone or other. The fact that you bring up "corrupt media" is ironic because you basically got some guy to come along and stick that in your head. Like in Monty Python's The Life of Brian. "You're all individuals" "Yes, we're all individuals" they all say robotically.

Yes, blacks have been told their whole lives that whites hate them, then you come on forums like this and find plenty of whites who hate blacks. Oh, what a fucking surprise.

So you figure that a blanket condemnation of the country as a whole is due because of a few assholes?
Isn't that not only pigheaded, childish, but racist as well?
Maybe I should have just condemned all of Germany when I lived there because a few of them are ignorant Nazis.

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

Very bigoted and short sided view. There are over 7 millions Muslims in the US...of what you said was true, you will here about US killing others like you said at least 2 times day....but it's not happening. You know why? Because we are busy making America stay great as it always was. We are businessmen and women, doctors, engineers, congressman , nurses, athletes, ect....we are the least to commit crimes in the US.

 

[mudwhistle]

So you figure that a blanket condemnation of the country as a whole is due because of a few assholes?
Isn't that not only pigheaded, childish, but racist as well?
Maybe I should have just condemned all of Germany when I lived there because a few of them are ignorant Nazis.

I'm trying to find the link between what I said and what you said. It's not coming to me. Maybe you can explain.

Question: What did I mean

Answer: Blacks don't deserve special consideration just because you want their votes


They shouldn't be allowed to make sweeping stereotypes about America as a whole just because of the acts of a few individuals. That is what they're doing here. Their own actions led us to this.

Wait. First, there are elections and people get to vote. The whole point of this is so that candidate can appeal to voters.

As for making sweeping stereotypes, the right doesn't have a problem with this when it comes to Muslims, does it? I mean, Trump does it all the time. So..... why shouldn't blacks?

The right is smart enough to know that Muslims are the only group that seems to have so much of a problem with the rest of the world that they're willing to kill people they don't know for no reason other than religion. Not all Muslims do this, but enough of them to make them a security risk. If only 10% of them are suicidal and homicidal, since 22% of the worlds population is Muslim, 2.2% of the world is going to try to kill the rest of us in the name of Muhammad. That's 165,000,000 potential murderers walking among us. The more of these people you bring here the more killing they will do. The only way you can change this is if you either stop them from coming here or change the religion. It's easier to stop them from coming here because you can't change an entire life of brainwashing.

Very bigoted and short sided view. There are over 7 millions Muslims in the US...of what you said was true, you will here about US killing others like you said at least 2 times day....but it's not happening. You know why? Because we are busy making America stay great as it always was. We are businessmen and women, doctors, engineers, congressman , nurses, athletes, ect....we are the least to commit crimes in the US.

I figure most Muslims in America are moderates.

Then Obama starts bringing thousands of them from Syria and other countries that hate us.

We just had a murder this weekend up here in Nashville this weekend. Guy was an immigrant from SUDAN. Walked into a church and murdered a woman before an armed deacon stopped him.

Shooter kills one, wounds 7 at Tennessee church - CNN

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEVvYKiMpZP44AYKc3nIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByMG04Z2o2BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw--/RV=2/RE=1506474122/RO=10/RU=http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/24/deadly-tennessee-church-shooting-sudanese-immigrant-arrested-fbi-to-launch-civil-rights-investigation.html/RK=1/RS=yMkQrpGjI8GeJT4PETx2emL3a1E-

 

[ColonelAngus]

I'm skipping all NFL this weekend...not college, though.

 

[Pogo]

I'm skipping all NFL this weekend...not college, though.

That's a good plan. You could definitely use more college.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes they are, and the solution to those problems are simple, it's just that the left will never accept simple solutions because they don't involve violence or controversy.

Perhaps, but we are talking about it aren’t we? I personally don’t like how they protested but I can’t deny it’s legality or it’s effectiveness to ignite a conversation

Talk is cheap and doesn't solve the problem. Just like riots don't solve the problem, protests don't solve the problem, anti-Ameircan displays don't solve the problem. The only thing they do is cost a lot of people a lot of money.

I’ll bite... What solves the problem?

Very well:

Issue: football players protesting police brutality of black suspects.

Common denominator: all black suspects killed didn't listen to the orders of the police officers.

Solution to stop suspects from being killed: Obey all commands by a police officer.

Results: problem of blacks (armed and unarmed) getting killed by police officers stops.

Haha. Ray you can’t list “obey the law” as a solution. Of course that’s a solution but there are no action items on how to get that desired result. Want to try again?

Sure there are. Why don't some of these NFL billionaires fund a program that hires police officers to do assemblies in school gymnasiums? While we're at it, lets see those kneelers put some of their money where their mouth is as well.

The police can teach children how to interact with police officers if they are ever in that situation. Teach the kids how they were trained and why they make commands that they make. Teach them some of our laws that are frequently misconstrued. Teach them that no police officer wants to kill anybody; they do so because of no other choice. Their friends and family lie to them when they say that the white police are out to kill as many black folks as they can get away with.

Now if we had programs like that, would those programs likely save more black people getting killed by police or kneeling when the National Anthem is being played?

 

[Slade3200]

Perhaps, but we are talking about it aren’t we? I personally don’t like how they protested but I can’t deny it’s legality or it’s effectiveness to ignite a conversation

Talk is cheap and doesn't solve the problem. Just like riots don't solve the problem, protests don't solve the problem, anti-Ameircan displays don't solve the problem. The only thing they do is cost a lot of people a lot of money.

I’ll bite... What solves the problem?

Very well:

Issue: football players protesting police brutality of black suspects.

Common denominator: all black suspects killed didn't listen to the orders of the police officers.

Solution to stop suspects from being killed: Obey all commands by a police officer.

Results: problem of blacks (armed and unarmed) getting killed by police officers stops.

Haha. Ray you can’t list “obey the law” as a solution. Of course that’s a solution but there are no action items on how to get that desired result. Want to try again?

Sure there are. Why don't some of these NFL billionaires fund a program that hires police officers to do assemblies in school gymnasiums? While we're at it, lets see those kneelers put some of their money where their mouth is as well.

The police can teach children how to interact with police officers if they are ever in that situation. Teach the kids how they were trained and why they make commands that they make. Teach them some of our laws that are frequently misconstrued. Teach them that no police officer wants to kill anybody; they do so because of no other choice. Their friends and family lie to them when they say that the white police are out to kill as many black folks as they can get away with.

Now if we had programs like that, would those programs likely save more black people getting killed by police or kneeling when the National Anthem is being played?

Those are all good ideas that I would support. I think if you took the time to look at the community outreach that both the NFL and many of its players do, you would be surprised. They put a tremendous amount of time and money into their communities and towards youth programs. Hopefully this discussion stirs support for more of the interactions that you mentioned between cops and the community. I think those efforts would definatey make a difference. The only way to get there is by voicing a demand for it or electing leaders who support those efforts. Wouldn’t you agree?