If republicans want to learn the truth about climate change and accept it, they just need to...

[Billy000]

...follow some very simple steps to start off with:

1) Avoid any bullshit rightwing media shit spewers that spin the truth on the matter like Fox News, Forbes.com, Rush Limbaugh, Heritage, National Review, Blaze, etc.

2) Seek out independent scientific sources (environmental science, geology, etc) with PEER-REVIEWED studies on climate change. It's easy to find small studies that are not peer-reviewed that distort their data to suggest fossil fuels have not caused changes to our climate. ANY scientific study you read needs to be peer-reviewed. Peer-reviewed means the study was examined by independent experts not associated with the team that created the study. The vast majority of peer-reviewed studies from around the world provide concrete evidence human activity such as the use of fossil fuels has influenced our climate. I encourage you to read these articles written by experts with no political biases toward their work.

3) Accept that the debate is over and that you were wrong about this issue. I know it's hard for you big, tough men and women to swallow your pride, but you need to accept it.

Yes, the debate on climate change has gone through some controversy. Sure, some climatologists fudged data in the past but that didn't happen because they were trying to hide some ridiculous, elaborate conspiracy. They just did it for their OWN work to be recognized. This will be attempted in any scientific field but luckily they have the peer reviewed system.

What needs to happen now is action. We need to do something about this issue TODAY.

Start with this:

"Scientists need to back up their opinions with research and data that survive the peer-review process. A Skeptical Science peer-reviewed survey of all (over 12,000) peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'globalclimate change' and 'global warming' published between 1991 and 2011 (Cook et al. 2013) found that over 97% of the papers taking a position on the subject agreed with the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of the project, the scientist authors were emailed and rated over 2,000 of their own papers. Once again, over 97% of the papers taking a position on the cause of global warming agreed that humans are causing it."

Is there a scientific consensus on global warming

 

[hortysir]

In other words blindly accept what is told to us.
That's not gonna happen.
It's why we're not called Democrats

 

[Mr. H.]

...follow some very simple steps to start off with:

1) Avoid any bullshit rightwing media shit spewers that spin the truth on the matter like Fox News, Forbes.com, Rush Limbaugh, Heritage, National Review, Blaze, etc.

2) Seek out independent scientific sources (environmental science, geology, etc) with PEER-REVIEWED studies on climate change. It's easy to find small studies that are not peer-reviewed that distort their data to suggest fossil fuels have not caused changes to our climate. ANY scientific study you read needs to be peer-reviewed. Peer-reviewed means the study was examined by independent experts not associated with the team that created the study. The vast majority of peer-reviewed studies from around the world provide concrete evidence human activity such as the use of fossil fuels has influenced our climate. I encourage you to read these articles written by experts with no political biases toward their work.

3) Accept that the debate is over and that you were wrong about this issue. I know it's hard for you big, tough men and women to swallow your pride, but you need to accept it.

Yes, the debate on climate change has gone through some controversy. Sure, some climatologists fudged data in the past but that didn't happen because they were trying to hide some ridiculous, elaborate conspiracy. They just did it for their OWN work to be recognized. This will be attempted in any scientific field but luckily they have the peer reviewed system.

What needs to happen now is action. We need to do something about this issue TODAY.

Is this how Liberals assess hydraulic fracturing, Keystone XL , drilling in ANWR, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and the OCS?

Brotch off.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ain't gonna happen. They are so deeply imbedded in cement, they're simply not able to open their minds to anything but what they're told to blindly believe.

 

[Mr. H.]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

 

[washamericom]

what's this sudden push of global warming. i've seen it all over, starting w/ the sotu.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

All we have to do is ignore science and real climate numbers. Then we can all be onboard for not really a climate thing but a tax to pay for...nothing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Drink the agw koolaid

Snort it straight from the can

 

[Missouri_Mike]

what's this sudden push of global warming. i've seen it all over, starting w/ the sotu.

It's more left wing bullshit. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. If you like your insurance you can keep your insurance. If you like your global warming you can keep your globull warming while freezing your ass off

 

[Billy000]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

 

[Billy000]

Drink the agw koolaid

Snort it straight from the can

Ok, so I am getting the vibe you are one of those douches who believes climate science is secretly an elaborate, global conspiracy theory to control the masses.

Lol people like you never get old.

So who runs this global conspiracy? Who are they? What do they want? Where is the evidence?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You know what can cure climate change? Taxes. Yep the only way to fight globull warming is taxes. Paying taxes makes everything just fine. If the tax is high enough we can actually not change the climate but we can sure as hell relieve you of your money because...climate!

 

[Billy000]

Ain't gonna happen. They are so deeply imbedded in cement, they're simply not able to open their minds to anything but what they're told to blindly believe.

I honestly think at this point in the debate it is a matter of denial. They aren't capable of swallowing their pride and just admitting they were wrong.

 

[OKTexas]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Of course you have something written by actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry to refute it, right? Yet you didn't post it, I wonder why. Is it that nothing exist to support your position? The people who do it know it's safe.

 

[Billy000]

what's this sudden push of global warming. i've seen it all over, starting w/ the sotu.

It's more left wing bullshit. If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. If you like your insurance you can keep your insurance. If you like your global warming you can keep your globull warming while freezing your ass off

That's what you aren't understanding. There is nothing leftwing or rightwing about the evidence of man made climate change. Nothing political. It is a scientific issue with a global consensus.

 

[Billy000]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Of course you have something written by actual scientist affiliated with the energy to refute it, right? Yet you didn't post it, I wonder why. Is it that nothing exist to support your position? The people who do it know it's safe.

Would you prefer it if I linked you to one of the many thousands peer reviewed studies the world over that support what I am saying? I'm willing to bet you would only whine more.

 

[Porker]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Dying is not a lot of fun, you dumbass. If you, a dimocrat, want to learn about Global warming here is an article from the LIBERAL/democrat website...the HUFFINGTON POST about 49 former NASA astronauts and scientists who claim the following:

"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."
​

If you don't mind I'll go along with these guys. Hell, I'll go along with these guys BECAUSE you mind. Get lost dumbass.

 

[Billy000]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Dying is not a lot of fun, you dumbass. If you, a dimocrat, want to learn about Global warming here is an article from the LIBERAL/democrat website...the HUFFINGTON POST about 49 former NASA astronauts and scientists who claim the following:

"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."
​

If you don't mind I'll go along with these guys. Hell, I'll go along with these guys BECAUSE you mind. Get lost dumbass.

Lol you people never cease to amaze me. Wow. Just wow. Your response to this thread is a link to a grand total of 49 ASTRONAUTS who don't believe in climate change? This is too much fun lol.

 

[OKTexas]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Of course you have something written by actual scientist affiliated with the energy to refute it, right? Yet you didn't post it, I wonder why. Is it that nothing exist to support your position? The people who do it know it's safe.

Would you prefer it if I linked you to one of the many thousands peer reviewed studies the world over that support what I am saying? I'm willing to bet you would only whine more.

Sure go ahead, I know we have been fracking in Texas for more than 60 years with no problems and the newer techniques are better and safer than the older ones.

 

[Billy000]

California Ban Fracking Rally No Science All Stunts

Fucking morons.

Ok this is what I am talking about. Lol you people kill me. Your response to this thread is linking an article not written by an actual scientist affiliated with the energy industry.

Bravo, H. You make things so much clearer for the rest of us about rightwing bullshit.

Of course you have something written by actual scientist affiliated with the energy to refute it, right? Yet you didn't post it, I wonder why. Is it that nothing exist to support your position? The people who do it know it's safe.

Would you prefer it if I linked you to one of the many thousands peer reviewed studies the world over that support what I am saying? I'm willing to bet you would only whine more.

Sure go ahead, I know we have been fracking in Texas for more than 60 years with no problems and the newer techniques are better and safer than the older ones.

How about this?

Is there a scientific consensus on global warming

"Scientists need to back up their opinions with research and data that survive the peer-review process. A Skeptical Science peer-reviewed survey of all (over 12,000) peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'globalclimate change' and 'global warming' published between 1991 and 2011 (Cook et al. 2013) found that over 97% of the papers taking a position on the subject agreed with the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of the project, the scientist authors were emailed and rated over 2,000 of their own papers. Once again, over 97% of the papers taking a position on the cause of global warming agreed that humans are causing it."