timslash
Active Member
Really, why? Why now, people trying to find racism everywhere? Why now, kid which wacth Redskins game few years ago, now, shouts about racism. And why these people can't find racism in hings that they still like?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because Black horse has nothing to do with race?Really, why? Why now, people trying to find racism everywhere? Why now, kid which wacth Redskins game few years ago, now, shouts about racism. And why these people can't find racism in hings that they still like?
Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
'By the consent of black people.' I wonder where that poll was conducted. How many black people need to consent?Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
It is still not racist and the idea that it is is ignorant.If the Redskins' mascot was a peanut, it would not be racist. But it is a picture of an Amerind instead.
Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
How many YEARS has this football them been called the, Redskins?
and now all of a sudden it has become offensive. Our freedoms are being wiped out everyday by this political correctness bs.
And we have terrorist attacking around the world and this is what YOUR President finds the most important thing to get involved in
SNIP:
Obama lawyers go to court to fight Redskins over team name
ByStephen Dinan- The Washington Times - Friday, January 9, 2015
TheObamaadministration joined a lawsuit opposing theWashington Redskins‘ team trademark on Friday, filing court papers to defend the federal law that gives the government the power to deny recognition to trademarks it believes to be disparaging.
The Patent and TrademarkOffice’sappeals board had revoked the NFL team’s trademarks last year, finding that they were offensive and so they weren’t protected under federal law. TheJustice Departmentsaid it agrees with them, and will fight a lawsuit by the team’s owners seeking to overturn the federal Lanham Act as a violation of free speech.
ALL of it here:
Read more:Obama lawyers go to court to fight Redskins over team name - Washington Times
Follow us:@washtimes on Twitter
How many YEARS has this football them been called the, Redskins?
and now all of a sudden it has become offensive. Our freedoms are being wiped out everyday by this political correctness bs.
And we have terrorist attacking around the world and this is what YOUR President finds the most important thing to get involved in
SNIP:
Obama lawyers go to court to fight Redskins over team name
ByStephen Dinan- The Washington Times - Friday, January 9, 2015
TheObamaadministration joined a lawsuit opposing theWashington Redskins‘ team trademark on Friday, filing court papers to defend the federal law that gives the government the power to deny recognition to trademarks it believes to be disparaging.
The Patent and TrademarkOffice’sappeals board had revoked the NFL team’s trademarks last year, finding that they were offensive and so they weren’t protected under federal law. TheJustice Departmentsaid it agrees with them, and will fight a lawsuit by the team’s owners seeking to overturn the federal Lanham Act as a violation of free speech.
ALL of it here:
Read more:Obama lawyers go to court to fight Redskins over team name - Washington Times
Follow us:@washtimes on Twitter
IF the court system is anything it should throw out Obama and his legacy lawsuit since Obama has no standing in the case, if there were a case. He isn't anywhere near an native American. Now if Warren filed suit she could argue she has standing because she has high cheek bones.
There was no poll. If there was an issue Black people would have made it known.'By the consent of black people.' I wonder where that poll was conducted. How many black people need to consent?Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
Neither. We dont require official edicts.Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
does that ruling come from the NAACP or the Congressional Black Caucus?
Being offended at the name redskins is not the same as being offended at anything. Your assumption that if someone is offended at one issue then they must be offended at another is puerile and simplistic.It is still not racist and the idea that it is is ignorant.If the Redskins' mascot was a peanut, it would not be racist. But it is a picture of an Amerind instead.
Being offended at virtually anything must be really tiring and it is getting really old.
Exactly. And neither do red skinned potatoes. What an idiot the OP is.Because Black horse has nothing to do with race?Really, why? Why now, people trying to find racism everywhere? Why now, kid which wacth Redskins game few years ago, now, shouts about racism. And why these people can't find racism in hings that they still like?
If the Redskins' mascot was a peanut, it would not be racist. But it is a picture of an Amerind instead.
Good thing its not a cave man.If the Redskins' mascot was a peanut, it would not be racist. But it is a picture of an Amerind instead.
Good thing it isn't a water melon.
Because calling something Blackish by the consent of Black people is not racist?What isn't the TV show "Blackish" racist?
If the Redskins' mascot was a peanut, it would not be racist. But it is a picture of an Amerind instead.