RWNJ
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2015
- 4,287
- 639
- 275
- Banned
- #801
For one thing, there were not nearly as many diseases back then. We know they didn't have aids. That's a recent development. In fact, new diseases are popping up all over the place.so Adam and Eve- and their children--were immune from all disease/etc?How many died from the plague? Do you know how that affected population growth? One little virus could wipe out the majority of humans, and there's not a damn thing we could do about it.hahahah--that's just it!!Don't know why they think they can predict population growth. After all, it only takes one virus to completely throw the numbers off.animal survival rates
https://www.quora.com/Nature-Are-an...ilar-to-that-of-humans-before-modern-medicineDepends on the animal. In some cases I'd say (pre-medicine) humans actually have it worse
World Population Growth - Our World in Data
chances of survival were much lower only decades ago without medicine/etc--not to mention at the time of creation/evolution
..babies were more likely to die--from disease/starvation/BIRTH--per the article/etc
it is a fact human life expectancy is higher now
now you are arguing with statistics--where are yours to back up your theory??