Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, I'm stupid. Let's lay up my outside information against what you've provided. Which is nothing.
I never said sex between underaged kids was always illegal. I said sex with 11 year olds is illegal, as I believe it is in every state. I also said the assertion that sex between kids is a non-issue, thus making the fact that condoms are being distributed at schools is a non-issue, was faulty, based upon the premise that if an 11 year old kid is having sex, we shouldn't be giving them condoms, we should be investigating a crime.
And Shogun, the link and the information from the CDC is right here in this thread. Your carping that it isn't pretty much invalidates anything you have said or will ever say about me not proving anything. Again.
The age which determines a child varies from state to state.
But every state has a law that states it's illegal to have sex with a child.
Moron.
The age which determines a child varies from state to state.
But every state has a law that states it's illegal to have sex with a child.
Moron.
Title 11 § 761. Definitions generally applicable to sexual offences. (j) A child who has not yet reached his or her sixteenth birthday is deemed unable to consent to a sexual act with a person more than 4 years older than said child. Children who have not yet reached their twelfth birthday are deemed unable to consent to a sexual act under any circumstances.
You blooming idiot.
"Children who have not yet reached their twelfth birthday are deemed unable to consent to a sexual act under any circumstances."
As I said, it is illegal I believe anywhere, for a child of 11 to have sex. With anyone. Will it be prosecuted? Who knows. The point is, it's illegal.
The point is moot, at any rate, because there is so little of this going on it doesn't even apply. But you go ahead and use it to justify your encouragement of young kids going at it, and to justify your willingness to ignore the fact that it's not young kids having sex with young kids you're sticking up for, it's child molesters.
Bravo.
ahh.. NOW it's a moot point..
NOW the percentage of applicable cases are so small that it doesn't matter.
anyone else find it COINCIDENTAL that she decides to eject now that she's been thoroughly spanked?
Yeah, and that's about the fourth time I've made that point, starting early on. I still completely negated it, but was being nice.
rolleyes: )
Again, the USA Today article. And remember, just because it was posted on a catholic site doesn't mean it was written by them.
The Dirty Secret Behind Teen Sex Numbers
Contrary to the common perception that teenage sex and pregnancy typically stem from two teenagers getting caught up in the heat of the moment, new research reveals that many teenage girls are being sexually exploited and impregnated by adult men.
In fact, a recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that adult men fathered two-thirds of the infants born to school-aged mothers in California in 1993. On average, these men were 4.2 years older than the senior-high mothers and 6.7 years older than the junior-high mothers.[1]
Again, the USA Today article. And remember, just because it was posted on a catholic site doesn't mean it was written by them.
The Dirty Secret Behind Teen Sex Numbers
Contrary to the common perception that teenage sex and pregnancy typically stem from two teenagers getting caught up in the heat of the moment, new research reveals that many teenage girls are being sexually exploited and impregnated by adult men.
In fact, a recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that adult men fathered two-thirds of the infants born to school-aged mothers in California in 1993. On average, these men were 4.2 years older than the senior-high mothers and 6.7 years older than the junior-high mothers.[1]
Here's some more goodies:
http://www.peterborough.nhs.uk/docu...le_Under_18.pdf?preventCache=30/05/2007+16:14
"Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, children under the age of 13 are considered of insufficient age to give consent to any form of sexual activity. Therefore penetrative sex with a child under the age of 13 is classed as rape."
http://www.prevent-abuse-now.com/stats.htm
"Reported cases of child sexual abuse reached epidemic proportions, with a reported 322 percent increase from 1980 to 1990.
Source: Sorensen & Snow, 1991."
Gee, another coincidence that happens to point to increased sex ed and relaxed attitudes about sex and children, and increased suffering for kids. I'm sure it means nothing...
Same site:
"In the adult retrosptective study, victimization was reported by 27 percent of the women and 16 percent of the men. The median age for the occurrence of reported abuse was 9.9 for boys and 9.6 for girls. Victimization occurred before age eight for 22 percent of boys and for 23 percent of girls. Most of the abuse of both boys and girls was by offenders 10 or more years older than their victims. Girls were more likely than boys to disclose the abuse. Forty-two percent of the women and thirty-three percent of the men reported never having disclosed the experience to anyone.
Source: Finkelhor et al., 1990"
Bottom line. If a kid's having sex, dollars to donuts, they're not having it with another kid. But if thinking that makes you feel better about helping make the molesters' lives easier, good for you.
Acutally, I posted a variety of stuff, from a variety of sources (including the CDC). Which you know. But I'm not dragging it to every thread.
No, you posted a link to the CDC that showed increases in different demographics BUT AT NO TIME DID THAT SOURCE SAY ANYTHING ABOUT A CORRELATION BETWEEN SEX ED AND TEEN SEX. WHICH, im betting, you were hoping that no one clicked on the link so you didn't have to explainwhy your SOURCE did NOT say what you suggested it did.
and, you posted a supposed article from supposed USA TODAY that can't be found on anything other than CATHOLIC ANTI-SEX ED BLOGS.. Indeed, your variety is different shades of shit brown.
Don't cry on my shoulder just because you don't understand what makes viable evidence.
All you have to do was prove me wrong by posting a link to the CDC that makes ANY correlation between teen sex and sex ed like YOU INSISTED YOU HAD. Or, find the actual USA TODAY article from some location other than an obviously biased source. But you wont. Because you CANT. and dont like it when I call you out on bullshit "evidence".
hey, any time now you can prove me wrong! I DOUBLE FUCKING DOG DARE you to do so.
I guess you were lying when you said I hadn't posted anything.
It showed the correlation. I'm sorry, I thought you were smarter than apparently you are, because I figured you understood that the years with the huge jump were the years that sex education began to be pushed in the schools. We do agree that the heyday of sex education was between 1976-1990, don't we? Or are you going to claim that there's no evidence that sex education became a standard part of the curriculum during those years?
