JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,756
- 2,220
When I first read about Kyle's accusations, I just thought that they were over the top. Why would a media personality like Ventura slam on Navy SEALS whose reputation in part Ventura based his own media persona on? That is like cutting off your own feet; didn't make sense. Then to say that Ventura would say something as heinously evil as 'some of them deserved to die' at the WAKE of a fellow Navy SEAL is just preposterous.
Well the jury agreed with Ventura and decided that Kyle lied, but what are the damages and who should pay them? Though Ventura publicly stated that he would drop the lawsuit if Kyle would just retract his statements about him and apologize, Kyle refused. This was causing and is still causing Ventura damage to his reputation and career, so what was Kyle's reason for continuing the bullshit? His story totally fell apart in court and the jury gave a unanimous verdict; NO ONE believed Kyle after hearing both sides.
But when Kyle died, the lawsuit continued against Kyle's estate, which is normally what is done. I don't know how Tara could have repaired the damage her husband did to Ventura's rep and career, but I think settling out of court would have been the smart thing to do. But for some bizarre reason, SHE KEPT THE SUIT GOING REFUSING TO SETTLE.
Now she lost $1.8 million, which will come out of her husbands book sales money, and we are all supposed to feel sorry for her? Why didn't she settle out of court?
Here is a full article that takes Ventura's side of the story; we still do that in this great country, don't we? Try to get BOTH sides to a story before engaging in slander and verbal attacks?
Justice for Jesse: Ventura Was Right in His Lawsuit | National Review Online
Some interesting quotes form the article:
So the whole story would seem to be that Kyle lied about Ventura to dive up sales of his book and he made about$7 million off Ventura's reputation, which was ruined. Kyle dies and his widow, Tara, who could have settled out of court refuses to do so and eventually loses a long legal battle. The court is so outraged by the scope and flagrance of the lies told about Ventura that it not only gives him $500,000 in damages but adds another 1.3 million for unjust enrichment (meaning that Kyle and his estate wrongly profited from said defamation).
Well the jury agreed with Ventura and decided that Kyle lied, but what are the damages and who should pay them? Though Ventura publicly stated that he would drop the lawsuit if Kyle would just retract his statements about him and apologize, Kyle refused. This was causing and is still causing Ventura damage to his reputation and career, so what was Kyle's reason for continuing the bullshit? His story totally fell apart in court and the jury gave a unanimous verdict; NO ONE believed Kyle after hearing both sides.
But when Kyle died, the lawsuit continued against Kyle's estate, which is normally what is done. I don't know how Tara could have repaired the damage her husband did to Ventura's rep and career, but I think settling out of court would have been the smart thing to do. But for some bizarre reason, SHE KEPT THE SUIT GOING REFUSING TO SETTLE.
Now she lost $1.8 million, which will come out of her husbands book sales money, and we are all supposed to feel sorry for her? Why didn't she settle out of court?
Here is a full article that takes Ventura's side of the story; we still do that in this great country, don't we? Try to get BOTH sides to a story before engaging in slander and verbal attacks?
Justice for Jesse: Ventura Was Right in His Lawsuit | National Review Online
Some interesting quotes form the article:
CNNs Anderson Cooper got in on the outrage game, tweeting: I cannot believe that Jesse Ventura successfully sued the widow of a fallen Navy SEAL. Has he no shame?
Whoa, there. Ventura sued Kyle in 2012. Kyle died, tragically, about a year later. The lawsuit then shifted to Chris Kyles estate, for which his wife, Taya, is the executor. It is utterly normal for a lawsuit to shift onto the estate, especially when the estate has profited from the issue in dispute. Considering Taya herself has profited from the book (earnings are estimated at a whopping $6 million, thanks to royalties and rights), it stands to reason that the shift is appropriate.
Consider this: A decorated veteran publishes a book saying he fought with someone in a bar after hearing the man say he worshiped the devil and/or thinks child molesters are fine. During the book tour, the author is asked to identify the monster and names you. It makes headlines, helping propel the books sales. You file a defamation suit and, roughly a year later, the author/veteran unexpectedly dies. His multimillion dollar estate goes to his wife, an estate largely consisting of profits from the book that defamed you. Do you drop the suit?
Of course not.
Ms. Kyle is a multimillionaire. With the $500,000 defamation portion of the award covered by libel insurance, only $1.3 million will come out of the Kyle estate (and thats assuming the judge even upholds that portion of the award). In light of the reported $6 million profits, not to mention potential profits from future book royalties (once the movie releases in 2015, the book is sure to rocket in sales again), and Kyles no doubt robust life-insurance policies, to claimthat this is cruel or a hardship on a destitute widow is ill informed and disingenuous.
Ventura noted on CBS This Morning Wednesday: Taya Kyle had all of her attorney fees paid by insurance. I did not. I incurred two and a half years of lawyer fees that I have to pay to clear my name, and she had insurance paying everything for her. It was me against an insurance company. Ventura added that he will use the winnings to pay off his attorneys fees.
MYTH: Even if Kyle lied about Ventura, his book sales werent significantly increased by that story, so Kyle did not profit from the defamation.
Wrong! In fact, the book made national headlines largely and probably only because of the salacious story about Ventura. Dont believe me? No worries take Kyles publicists word for it. At the time, the publicist remarked that the story was making the books sales go crazy.
Apart from the logical flaw in inferring that only Venturas witnesses would lie for him and not Kyles, consider the testimony of Bill and Charlene DeWitt, two witnesses who were at the bar the night of the fight:
Bill DeWitt has known Ventura since the two underwent Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training together in 1969. . . . The DeWitts, Ventura and other BUD/S classmates . . . convened at McPs bar the night before the ceremony the same night Kyle and his colleagues were at the bar for the wake of slain SEAL Michael Monsoor. . . . I was eavesdropping on Jesse, [Charlene DeWitt] said. She heard him criticize the war in Iraq but didnt hear him badmouth fallen soldiers or argue with younger servicemen. She said she didnt see him get into a fistfight or sport a black eye or bruised face in the following days. . . . Bill DeWitt also testified that he hadnt seen or heard any of the events described in the book.
Ventura may have been considered nutty and a crackpot by some (personally, I dont appreciate his 9/11 theories and strongly disagree with them), but he was not a hated figure. After Kyles story got national attention, Ventura was not only despised by many Americans but even hated by his own fellow veterans:
A petition circulated in 2013 seeking to have Ventura removed from the Underwater Demolition Team-SEAL Association, citing the events described in Kyles book and Venturas pursuit of the lawsuit after Kyles death. Dozens of military personnel signed it.
So the whole story would seem to be that Kyle lied about Ventura to dive up sales of his book and he made about$7 million off Ventura's reputation, which was ruined. Kyle dies and his widow, Tara, who could have settled out of court refuses to do so and eventually loses a long legal battle. The court is so outraged by the scope and flagrance of the lies told about Ventura that it not only gives him $500,000 in damages but adds another 1.3 million for unjust enrichment (meaning that Kyle and his estate wrongly profited from said defamation).