Huntsman slams Perry on global warming

With all the problems facing the US, I believe that global warming would be the least of our worries.

If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.

If it turns out to be true,

IF not not a certainty. You can't make truth out of falsied documents.

What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tatic.
 
With all the problems facing the US, I believe that global warming would be the least of our worries.

If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.

If it turns out to be true,

IF not not a certainty. You can't make truth out of falsied documents.

What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tatic.

Not 'the warmers.' 'The whole world except American Republicans.'

Your post should read:

What we do know for certain is that the whole world except American Republicans want to control...
 
Huntsman needs to stop supporting junk science and thinking our politics should be determined by it
 
If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.



IF not not a certainty. You can't make truth out of falsied documents.

What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tatic.

Not 'the warmers.' 'The whole world except American Republicans.'

Your post should read:

What we do know for certain is that the whole world except American Republicans want to control...

So you want to control what I write?

Nope here's what I wrote
What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tactic.

Thanks for proving me right warmmer.
 
IF not not a certainty. You can't make truth out of falsied documents.

What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tatic.

Not 'the warmers.' 'The whole world except American Republicans.'

Your post should read:

So you want to control what I write?

Nope here's what I wrote
What we do know for certian is that the warmmers want to control everybody's life by using a scare tactic.

Thanks for proving me right warmmer.

Not sure how you figure that's proving you right...

But anyway... Those you call 'warmmers' (with 2 m's for some reason) encompass everyone in the world except American republicans...

They're the ones that fund the junk science and propaganda that convince ne'er-do-wells like yourself that the entire world scientific community is 'Wrong,' and possibly part of some BIIIIIIIGGGG conspiracy...

Do you know how nuts that sounds?
 
You guys want to win again, right? Listen to Huntsman, it sounds like he’s smart enough to know the TPM nitwits and rightist ideologues need to be kicked to the backseat and allow the grown-ups to run things again.


You mean the Republican grown-ups the left blame for the mess we're in?
 
With all the problems facing the US, I believe that global warming would be the least of our worries.

If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.

I would take that a lot more seriously if you guys weren't changing your story every five minutes.

Heck you all stopped calling it "Global Warming" and started calling it "Climate Change", probably when all the things you said didn't happen and the world started cooling.

Remember when you guys blamed the 2005 Hurricane season on Global Warming and predicted that 2006 would be even worse. (2006 was actually a pretty mild hurricanse season).

Hey, remember when the predicted that all life in the seas would die in 1995?

Here's a list of 8 climate predictions from 1970. None of them have happened.

Eight Botched Environmental Forecasts | FoxNews.com

Did they ever tell you guys the story about the boy who cried wolf?
 
With all the problems facing the US, I believe that global warming would be the least of our worries.

If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.

I would take that a lot more seriously if you guys weren't changing your story every five minutes.

Heck you all stopped calling it "Global Warming" and started calling it "Climate Change", probably when all the things you said didn't happen and the world started cooling.

Remember when you guys blamed the 2005 Hurricane season on Global Warming and predicted that 2006 would be even worse. (2006 was actually a pretty mild hurricanse season).

Hey, remember when the predicted that all life in the seas would die in 1995?

Here's a list of 8 climate predictions from 1970. None of them have happened.

Eight Botched Environmental Forecasts | FoxNews.com

Did they ever tell you guys the story about the boy who cried wolf?

I glanced at your story, I'm sure some or all of them are taken out of context and could be easily dismantled (a-la "Obama promised UE would not exceed 8%," et al).

I just don't have the energy, I honestly do not.

It's like arguing with religious people. Got an answer for everything; It's exhausting.

Perhaps later I'll pore it over a bit.
 
Last edited:
It has to be said that Huntsman and Romney are too intelligent to be republicans today. Reagan and Goldwater could not be republicans today. Eisenhower would be called a socialist and Lincoln accused of being from another planet. The party is so backward, Perry, Bachmann, and Palin added all together have the IQ and experience of a three year old. No offence meant to three year olds.

If your guy is so smart, why are we still in the worst recession in 80 years?

Huntsman's problem is that he's a lib in a state where Democrats can't get elected, so he called himself a Republican and made some headway for a while.

He really needs to run as a Democrat, and challenge Obama. I think, though, he's just running to spite Romney, and there's some LDS inside baseball I'd rather not think about.
Too much time spent sucking up to urban SLC libs.
 
If it turns out to be true, ya know, like virtually everyone with a brain says it will, it will quickly become the number one issue worldwide. Of course, by then it will likely be too late, as it may already be.

I would take that a lot more seriously if you guys weren't changing your story every five minutes.

Heck you all stopped calling it "Global Warming" and started calling it "Climate Change", probably when all the things you said didn't happen and the world started cooling.

Remember when you guys blamed the 2005 Hurricane season on Global Warming and predicted that 2006 would be even worse. (2006 was actually a pretty mild hurricanse season).

Hey, remember when the predicted that all life in the seas would die in 1995?

Here's a list of 8 climate predictions from 1970. None of them have happened.

Eight Botched Environmental Forecasts | FoxNews.com

Did they ever tell you guys the story about the boy who cried wolf?

I glanced at your story, I'm sure some or all of them are taken out of context and could be easily dismantled (a-la "Obama promised UE would not exceed 8%," et al).

I just don't have the energy, I honestly do not.

It's like arguing with religious people. Got an answer for everything; It's exhausting.

Perhaps later I'll pore it over a bit.

Well, please do.

Frankly, I'm probably not entirely against you. But the alarmism of the environmental movement, which I've been watching pretty much my entire life (I'm nearly 50), has reduced the credibility of your side on these issues.

You guys have hit us with one scare after another, and none of it actually happens.
 
Oddball, it's so good to hear from one of my biggest fans. Hope all is well with you, did mommy got finally you that dictionary we talked about. Are you using it? All this vulgarity isn't going to help your career. I do realize you are repeating the fifth grade again, but you keep trying and let me know in June how you did. I'll help when I can.


Oddball said:
Hi, you have received -573 reputation points from Oddball.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
fucking snob

Regards,
Oddball

Note: This is an automated message.


It has to be said that Huntsman and Romney are too intelligent to be republicans today. Reagan and Goldwater could not be republicans today. Eisenhower would be called a socialist and Lincoln accused of being from another planet. The party is so backward, Perry, Bachmann, and Palin added all together have the IQ and experience of a three year old. No offence meant to three year olds.

How can the first elected Republican President be called a plant?

You are right todays GOP is yeaterdays Democrats. Reagan and Goldwater would be a member's of the TEA party.
Hell, Hubert Humphrey and William Proxmire would be "extreme right-wingers" to today's liberoidal wackaloons.


Could this man be a republican today?

"Reagan Raised Taxes At Least 7 Times, Including the Biggest Corporate Tax Hike Ever

Republican former Sen. Alan Simpson — who was a friend of Pres. Ronald Reagan and who was conservative enough to be elected to the Senate three times by voters in Wyoming, Dick Cheney’s home state — is fed up by what the called the “myths and misconceptions and the distortions” about Reagan’s record on raising taxes.

Simpson, who serves on the federal commission charged with finding solutions to lowering the national debt, spoke out during a recent public hearing."

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KInQbzHqQ-g]Simpson Takes Down The Reagan Myth - YouTube[/ame]
 
Oddball, it's so good to hear from one of my biggest fans. Hope all is well with you, did mommy got finally you that dictionary we talked about. Are you using it? All this vulgarity isn't going to help your career. I do realize you are repeating the fifth grade again, but you keep trying and let me know in June how you did. I'll help when I can.


Oddball said:
Hi, you have received -573 reputation points from Oddball.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
fucking snob

Regards,
Oddball

Note: This is an automated message.


How can the first elected Republican President be called a plant?

You are right todays GOP is yeaterdays Democrats. Reagan and Goldwater would be a member's of the TEA party.
Hell, Hubert Humphrey and William Proxmire would be "extreme right-wingers" to today's liberoidal wackaloons.


Could this man be a republican today?

"Reagan Raised Taxes At Least 7 Times, Including the Biggest Corporate Tax Hike Ever

Republican former Sen. Alan Simpson — who was a friend of Pres. Ronald Reagan and who was conservative enough to be elected to the Senate three times by voters in Wyoming, Dick Cheney’s home state — is fed up by what the called the “myths and misconceptions and the distortions” about Reagan’s record on raising taxes.

Simpson, who serves on the federal commission charged with finding solutions to lowering the national debt, spoke out during a recent public hearing."

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KInQbzHqQ-g]Simpson Takes Down The Reagan Myth - YouTube[/ame]
No, Reagan, Simpson, Eisenhower, none of them would be electable by republicans today.
 
Reagan would get the nomination and beat Obama in 55 or 56 of the 57 States Obama claims to have visited in 2008
 
Huntsman slams Perry on global warming, Fed chief

"When we take a position that isn't willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science has said about what is causing climate change and man's contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position," Huntsman told ABC's "This Week."

Read more: Huntsman slams Perry on global warming, Fed chief

Exactly why Huntsman is no Republican.... he is an idiot, and should run against Obama. He'd make a better POTUS by far, but he is NO Republican.
 
Huntsman slams Perry on global warming, Fed chief

"When we take a position that isn't willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science has said about what is causing climate change and man's contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position," Huntsman told ABC's "This Week."

Read more: Huntsman slams Perry on global warming, Fed chief

Exactly why Huntsman is no Republican.... he is an idiot, and should run against Obama. He'd make a better POTUS by far, but he is NO Republican.

Because Republicans are too smart to fooled by stupid lying scientists who bring nothing to the US. Every Republican knows that to be true.
 
Reagan would get the nomination and beat Obama in 55 or 56 of the 57 States Obama claims to have visited in 2008

Today's Republicans would drive Reagan out of the Republican Party as too liberal. Eisenhower would be considered a socialist. Even Charlie McCarthy would be considered too elitist and too much of an "intellectual". Republicans would nominate "Mortimer Snerd".

Charlie-Det.jpg
 
Perry doesn't believe in evolution or global warming.

Republicans hate science because it involves truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top