How Obama Compares - Historic Presidential Approval Ratings

[Esmeralda]

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

 

[Mertex]

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than any of the others

So Obama was almost not the lowest high since WWII? Wow, then he really is beloved by the people. Thanks for pointing that out

Bwahahaha....trying to cover up your ignorant faux pas?

 

[Redfish]

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

Idiot....he has had one of the "highest lows" than GW Bush, GHW Bush, Reagan, and Ford..........and you're the idiot, if he had the "lowest high" on his first month.....that would only be because Bush had put the country in the toilet and it's pretty hard to recover in one month. Geez!

Read it again idiot......this is what the OP said:

"President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows" - so, no only can you not read.....you can't read the chart...........

yes, wytchey posted the chart, and she is correct. obozo had the highest low and the lowest high. All that says is that over time the people have not changed their opinions of him very much.

Having the media in your pocket is certainly a factor in how those 1200 people rated him.

It means nothing, but get all worked up over it if it helps you forget what a massive failure obama has been.

 

[Mertex]

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

 

[Redfish]

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

wrong, the data is always meaningless, but it give us something to waste time arguing about.

 

[Esmeralda]

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

wrong, the data is always meaningless, but it give us something to waste time arguing about.

Who you think you're foolin' kiddo? LOL

 

[mudwhistle]

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than any of the others.

You talk like Obama is gone already. Its unfair to compare an entire presidency with an incomplete presidency. Obama still has plenty of time to fuck things up. I don't think he's reached his low point , although last year was pretty damned bad for him.

 

[Mertex]

whoever the GOP runs will beat hilllary.

Bwahahahaha.....you are delusional....aside from inane!

care to put your money where your mouth is? Say a wager of 5K?

You wouldn't want to bet your whole worth, would you.....I'd be terribly guilty of making you homeless, besides, I don't bet.....but you probably wouldn't pay up anyway.

 

[Redfish]

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

 

[Mertex]

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

wrong, the data is always meaningless, but it give us something to waste time arguing about.

Who you think you're foolin' kiddo? LOL

Bwahahaha.....now he's trying to cover up his idiotic mistake...........

 

[Esmeralda]

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

George W. Buffoon Bush was the absolute worst president in American history: no contest.

 

[Mertex]

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

Bwahahaha.....trying to deflect from your idiotic mistake? You want to explain how to read the chart again?

 

[Seawytch]

yes, wytchey posted the chart, and she is correct. obozo had the highest low and the lowest high. All that says is that over time the people have not changed their opinions of him very much.

Having the media in your pocket is certainly a factor in how those 1200 people rated him.

It means nothing, but get all worked up over it if it helps you forget what a massive failure obama has been.

The polling methods were the same for all the presidents so you pointing out your ignorance of polling has no bearing on the results.

Everytime President Obama's rating has gone down, it's a media circus...but when it goes up, not a peep from the "liberal media". What the opening thread and chart pointed out is that he hasn't fallen anywhere near the historic lows of some past presidents and yet the media storyline is always "Obama's failing numbers".

 

[Redfish]

whoever the GOP runs will beat hilllary.

Bwahahahaha.....you are delusional....aside from inane!

care to put your money where your mouth is? Say a wager of 5K?

You wouldn't want to bet your whole worth, would you.....I'd be terribly guilty of making you homeless, besides, I don't bet.....but you probably wouldn't pay up anyway.

5K is an amount that I can easily put at risk, How about you? But if you are worried about me, I will put your money and mine in an account until after the election. PM me and I will tell you where to send it. Trust me "if you like your plan you can keep it"

 

[Mertex]

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

The "liberal media" loves to seize on stories of a falling Obama approval rating (and completely ignore it when his approval goes up) but with only two years left in his 2nd term, President Obama is on his way to have one of the highest lows...3rd behind Kennedy and Eisenhower.

LOL, so you just posted that Obama has the lowest high of any President since WWII and that was his ... wait for it ... first month in office. Wow, great argument...

Are you ignorant or have you been in a coma? Obama has been president since 2009.....(the rating is as of Jan 11, 2015.......that hardly makes it "one month"!......

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than any of the others.

You talk like Obama is gone already. Its unfair to compare an entire presidency with an incomplete presidency. Obama still has plenty of time to fuck things up. I don't think he's reached his low point , although last year was pretty damned bad for him.

And yet, his low wasn't as low as some of the Republicans on the chart........

 

[Esmeralda]

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

more liberal ignorance on display, you don't even know how to read the chart. He said the "lowest high". Obozo had his high point at 64. the lowest high of any president on the chart.

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

You are so wrong about Obama being considered the worst president in US history. I live in an international environment and travel internationally regularly. People do not think about Obama in those terms. However, people in other countries absolutely loathed GW Bush. In fact, that is why Obama got the Nobel Prize: the international world was so thrilled Bush would be gone and hope would spring again with Obama. He got the Nobel Prize because he replaced the most hated US president in history.

 

[Redfish]

And Reagan's highest was 68, only 4 points higher than Obama. Reagan's lowest was 35, 6 points lower than Obama. They are very close, with Reagan sinking lower than Obama. Obama's high and low point scale is closer to Reagan's than anyone of the others.

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

Bwahahaha.....trying to deflect from your idiotic mistake? You want to explain how to read the chart again?

you misread the chart, not us. You cannot back away from your ignorance . you own it

 

[Redfish]

yes, wytchey posted the chart, and she is correct. obozo had the highest low and the lowest high. All that says is that over time the people have not changed their opinions of him very much.

Having the media in your pocket is certainly a factor in how those 1200 people rated him.

It means nothing, but get all worked up over it if it helps you forget what a massive failure obama has been.

The polling methods were the same for all the presidents so you pointing out your ignorance of polling has no bearing on the results.

Everytime President Obama's rating has gone down, it's a media circus...but when it goes up, not a peep from the "liberal media". What the opening thread and chart pointed out is that he hasn't fallen anywhere near the historic lows of some past presidents and yet the media storyline is always "Obama's failing numbers".

come on wytchey, you are smarter than that. Polling is a game. designed to influence opinion, not to report on it.

 

[Mertex]

whoever the GOP runs will beat hilllary.

Bwahahahaha.....you are delusional....aside from inane!

care to put your money where your mouth is? Say a wager of 5K?

You wouldn't want to bet your whole worth, would you.....I'd be terribly guilty of making you homeless, besides, I don't bet.....but you probably wouldn't pay up anyway.

5K is an amount that I can easily put at risk, How about you? But if you are worried about me, I will put your money and mine in an account until after the election. PM me and I will tell you where to send it. Trust me "if you like your plan you can keep it"

You really are a nutjob is all I can say.

 

[Mertex]

So by that comparison you conclude what?

what all this really means is that some pollster asked about 1200 americans (out of 330,000,000) if they approved of what the president was doing at the time. Sorry, but none of this proves anything about the job that any president did. Its a silly game to make money for the pollsters.

LOL You guys are funny. When you want to point how out the data makes Obama look bad, you are all for it. When I can point out how it looks similar to Reagan's stats, you say the poll is meaningless. LMAO

Not only that..........they didn't even comprehend the OP....."highest low" - means that Obama's low wasn't even as low as most of the Republicans on the chart - but Fish is trying to argue that Obama is the worst President........only in his tiny mind.

obama is the worst president in our history. in the minds of millions of americans, and in the minds of millions of people in other countries. He has been a failure, accept that reality and move on.

Bwahahaha.....trying to deflect from your idiotic mistake? You want to explain how to read the chart again?

you misread the chart, not us. You cannot back away from your ignorance . you own it

No, idiot.....the chart gives the highs and lows.....the OP was pointing out the "lows" - go back to school........elementary.