Old Rocks
Diamond Member
jc, jc. Ever proving what a dumb and ignorant fuck you truly are. Ever hear of absorption spectra?For instance, the data that shows historically that CO2 levels lag temperature was ignored. The lag was both in the increase in temperature and the decrease sides.
You fail at the basic logic, which explains how you got sucked into the denier cult. People who can use logic properly will instantly see through the scams of the denier cult.
As I've pointed out to you before, and which you had no response to, your statement is wrong on two levels.
First, new data shows CO2 and temps rather close together.
Second, it doesn't matter. The past is not constrained to act like the present if conditions in the present are very different, and they are. Forest fires used to always be natural, but humans can still cause forest fires. Warming used to always be natural, but humans can still cause warming.
Data showing that in the past the CO2 levels were ten times higher but yet the earth was much cooler and data showing that at times the CO2 levels were lower but yet the earth was warmer were mostly ignored in the computer models.
No data is being ignored, except by you, over and over. Here, the smart people understood CO2 isn't the only climate driver. You seem to think global warming theory says nothing except CO2 can change climate, but your failure to grasp such basics is only your problem.
World wide temperature data was manipulated like we saw in Al Gore's hockey stick picture where data was cherry picked. When the scientist used all the data then the picture was different.
That kind of conspiracy kookery is unworthy of a response from any ethical person, other than a snort of derision. Sure, it plays well in your conspiracy cult, but the rest of the world knows it's nonsense, and repeating your conspiracy nonsense over and over won't change that.
Rain washes out most of the CO2 in the atmosphere.
Your science is hilariously bad. Like Hutch, I'd like to see you support that strange claim. Are you up for the challenge, or will you just declare that the foundations of your religion may not be challenged?
First, new data shows CO2 and temps rather close together.
So technogeek, how is CO2 released from the ocean? is it released when surface temps are cold or warm?
And, can you prove that CO2 drives climate? You merely pointed to a correlation, not a causation. It is the trick of the left to use and think everyone just buy into that. Nope, the fact is, there are no experiments. And the fact that the last 18 years of pause while CO2 has increased in the atmosphere is but proof that your causation ploy is just that a ploy. Temperature drives CO2 and why CO2 only releases from the ocean when the surface temps are warmer. Unless of course great technogeek, you can prove otherwise.