Horrible… Obama to Young People: “The Republicans Are Radical… Their Vision Is Radica

Obama is a Radical
Tea parties are Radical

Which type of radical do you support? If I had to go one way or the other i'd take the tea party radicalism over the Obama party radicalism
 
CON$ are pathological liars!!!!!!!!!

The Dems didn't have 60 votes until Al Franken was sworn in July 7, 2009 and went back down to 59 votes the day Scott Brown was sworn in, February 4, 2010. But in CON$ervoFascistLand, 7 months is "two full years." :cuckoo:

Did the democrats have a super majority at anytime between 2009 and 2011?

No. The question is based on false premise anyhow.
You two need to get your opinion fixed before you give out anymore as facts.
CON$ are pathological liars!!!!!!!!!

The Dems didn't have 60 votes until Al Franken was sworn in July 7, 2009 and went back down to 59 votes the day Scott Brown was sworn in, February 4, 2010. But in CON$ervoFascistLand, 7 months is "two full years." :cuckoo:

Did the democrats have a super majority at anytime between 2009 and 2011?
Is 7 months "TWO FULL YEARS?"
 
Did the democrats have a super majority at anytime between 2009 and 2011?

No. The question is based on false premise anyhow.
You two need to get your opinion fixed before you give out anymore as facts.
Did the democrats have a super majority at anytime between 2009 and 2011?
Is 7 months "TWO FULL YEARS?"

Mine is fact.

There is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority based on party designation alone. It is a myth.
 
Most of Obama's deficits were the result of Bush policies he got stuck with and lower tax revenues caused by the recession.

LOL, now who didn't SEE this coming.:eusa_hand:

It's a fact:

Bush's 2008 deficit = 458 billion. Obama inherited that.

Loss of tax revenue 2009 versus 2008 = 421 billion

That's about 880 billion dollars worth of deficit that Obama had nothing to do with. The 2009 deficit was 1.4 trillion.

Therefore, yes, what I stated was a fact. Most of the Obama deficit in 2009 was Bush's or the economy's. That's without even calculating how much mandatory spending went up because of increased unemployment, food stamps, Medicaid, etc., all of which were caused by the recession and not Obama policies.

Oops, once again I have shut Stephanie up.

lol, she's off pouting on the couch, drowning her sorrows in a mixing bowl full of Pringles.
 
LOL, now who didn't SEE this coming.:eusa_hand:

It's a fact:

Bush's 2008 deficit = 458 billion. Obama inherited that.

Loss of tax revenue 2009 versus 2008 = 421 billion

That's about 880 billion dollars worth of deficit that Obama had nothing to do with. The 2009 deficit was 1.4 trillion.

Therefore, yes, what I stated was a fact. Most of the Obama deficit in 2009 was Bush's or the economy's. That's without even calculating how much mandatory spending went up because of increased unemployment, food stamps, Medicaid, etc., all of which were caused by the recession and not Obama policies.

Oops, once again I have shut Stephanie up.

lol, she's off pouting on the couch, drowning her sorrows in a mixing bowl full of Pringles.

lol, wrong bucko, but don't break your arm patting yourself on the back.
 
Not surprising, when you have no positive accomplishments to support your campaign you use the next best format, put on a dog and pony shows and throw as much misinformation, lies and mud at your opposition as you can.
 
Stephanie Teabirther, shame on you. Take the 3 trillion for two wars, the 2.4 trillion in tax cuts and Part D, the last two passed through reconciliation, and Obama is "worse"?

And Republicans gave Bin Laden a 10 year "head start". Shameful.

You should have "Mr. Teabirther explain to you how things work.

Your numbers are all made up.

You obviously can't defend your messiah without lying.

Hilarious!
 
No. The question is based on false premise anyhow.
You two need to get your opinion fixed before you give out anymore as facts.
Is 7 months "TWO FULL YEARS?"

Mine is fact.

There is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority based on party designation alone. It is a myth.

So what do you base it on?
I see now the meme is that Obama couldn't really do what he needed because the GOP was obstructing him. Never mind Obama had a larger majority of Dems in COngress than any other Democratic president in history. That isn't important to this fantasy. IN this fantasy everything would be hunky-dory now if it were not for that evil Party of No.

Do people really buy this bullshit? I don't think the average Joe out there does. THey know better.
 
No. The question is based on false premise anyhow.
You two need to get your opinion fixed before you give out anymore as facts.
Is 7 months "TWO FULL YEARS?"

Mine is fact.

There is no such thing as a filibuster proof majority based on party designation alone. It is a myth.

WOW^^^^^^^^^^^^ amazed at the utter incompatance and stupidity of this post.
So is that how you're going to spin the reason obama did not get all his agenda passed?

Overnight, focus shifts to possible filibuster-proof Senate majority
Overnight, focus shifts to possible filibuster-proof Senate majority - Sunday, Oct. 26, 2008 | 2 a.m. - Las Vegas Sun
 
Obama is just as radical as the tea parties.....I dont get it, is he saying we shouldn't listen to him either or is it just people who are radical with values that aren't the same as his?
 
Obama is just as radical as the tea parties.....I dont get it, is he saying we shouldn't listen to him either or is it just people who are radical with values that aren't the same as his?

How do you figure the Tea Party is radical??? They are no more radical than the Founders of this country.
 
Last edited:
Socialism is a philosophy of failure,the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy it's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill
 
This is like being pissed because a drunk acts like a drunk.

Obama's a nobody with a resume that fits in a thimble leaving room for finger. He'll be gone soon enough.. what with his record of $14,000,000,000,000 debt, record deficits, 35,000,000 unemployed, $5 gas, inflation, Obamacare, no foreign policy, etc.

Blaming it on Bush ain't flying except with the few remaining enchanted followers of the boy-king. Let's not fixate on him being who he is.
 
I guess you can't take the COMMUNITY AGITATOR out of him even as President. total disgrace. you all who voted for him should be ASHAMED

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, April 21, 2011, 5:03 AM
Worst. President. Ever.
The most radical far left president in American history yesterday told an audience of (unemployed?) young Americans that, “Republicans are radical…. Their vision is radical.”
Via The Blaze:
YouTube - Obama Calls GOP Budget 'radical, Not Courageous'

He also told the (unemployed?) kids that Republicans will reduce the deficit “on your backs.”
What a horrible leader.

Barack Obama is the biggest spender in the history of earth. He tripled the deficit in one year, he increased the debt by nearly $4 trillion in two years and Obama and democrats increased the budget by $1 trillion in the three years.

read the rest and comments.
Horrible… Obama to Young People: “The Republicans Are Radical… Their Vision Is Radical” (Video) | The Gateway Pundit

Obama's SPOT on!!!

:clap2: :clap2:
 
I guess you can't take the COMMUNITY AGITATOR out of him even as President. total disgrace. you all who voted for him should be ASHAMED

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, April 21, 2011, 5:03 AM
Worst. President. Ever.
The most radical far left president in American history yesterday told an audience of (unemployed?) young Americans that, “Republicans are radical…. Their vision is radical.”
Via The Blaze:
YouTube - Obama Calls GOP Budget 'radical, Not Courageous'

He also told the (unemployed?) kids that Republicans will reduce the deficit “on your backs.”
What a horrible leader.

Barack Obama is the biggest spender in the history of earth. He tripled the deficit in one year, he increased the debt by nearly $4 trillion in two years and Obama and democrats increased the budget by $1 trillion in the three years.

read the rest and comments.
Horrible… Obama to Young People: “The Republicans Are Radical… Their Vision Is Radical” (Video) | The Gateway Pundit

Obama's SPOT on!!!

:clap2: :clap2:

Obama failed to mention that he's increasing the deficit on their backs.

:clap2::clap2:
:lol::lol:
 
Actually there are some valid critcisms of President Obama and the problem basically is..Conservatives are not making them. In fact they are buttressing his agenda. The American people are left to decide between a party that backs corporate interests but helps the common folk..and a party that backs corporate interests and destroys the common folk.

Who do you think they are going to pick?

Ya, Democrats help the COMMON FOLKS, BY stealing money FROM OTHERS who WORK and give to those WHO DON'T.... how charitable of them.

And that's the pickle..right there. This whole idea by conservatives that "taxation" is somehow stealing. The government is constitutionally mandated to tax..that's how it keeps going. Otherwise, there won't be a government.

And this whole notion of the way labor is rewarded in this country is way out of whack. So really..you guys are speaking to a very small part of the population. Personally, I wish Ron Paul wasn't such a nut job..because I agree with most of what he says. But then there is the whacky stuff like eliminating the Fed that totally turns me off.

Why do you think we need a federal reserve?
 
OMG...is this idiot serious. Radical.....What about Obumba himself, radical left wing communist and his ilk, starting with Pelosi, Hitlary and Co.
2012 can't come quick enough to be rid of this pestilence and anti American govt headed by a "Token of the left".
 

Forum List

Back
Top