Holy sh**!!! Comey: "If an FBI agent did what Hillary did they'd face 'severe consequences'!!??

[Lakhota]

Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).

"Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Funny. He stated today that he doesn't know if Hillary's private server was hacked. Pay attention...

You are certifiably stupid.

"But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence."

Funny. Is there direct evidence that you did or did not kill Jimmy Hoffa?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

So, no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case, but reasonable voters would vote for a candidate who:

REPEATEDLY LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT NOT RECEIVING OR SENDING SECRET INFORMATION...

REPEATEDLY LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT GIVING ALL THE EMAILS TO THE FBI AND FOIA ATTORNEYS....

REPEATEDLY LIED ABOUT LET PEOPLE WITHOUT CLEARANCE ACCESS TO SECRET INFORMATION...

IN ADDITION TO LYING TO THE FAMILIES OF THE BENGHAZI VICTIMS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT THE ATTACKS IN LIBYA BEING ABOUT A VIDEO...

LYING ABOUT BEING A PROGRESSIVE, THEN CHANGING TO A LIBERAL...

LYING ABOUT FOREIGN DONORS TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION...

AND THE LIST GOES ON....

GREAT CHOICE FOR PREZ. ONE WITHOUT INTEGRITY!!

Doesn't matter. Scum like ValeRati hold party above all else. The ONLY thing gutter scum like that cares about is power for her party, in hopes she will get some scraps from her master's table.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
this partisan witch hunt is based on rabid hacks putting party over country.

Yes, poor put upon Hillary, all she did was attempt to ensure that FOA requests could be thwarted. So what if top secret emails were intercepted by the Chinese, Russia, or ISIS. If American assets died because ISIS intercepted top secret drone strike information, who cares? You sure the fuck don't, the party is what matters.

I mean really, the only thing that matters is party, am I right?

Hillary is head of the party, so laws, the Constitution, all that hokey shit, that is for rubes. The party is what matters. You need to make sure that the party is protected and will not let some fucking law interfere with the party. Laws are not meant for party bosses.

Party above all, in all things - that's the Khmer Rouge democrat way!

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
No. It's because their jobs are different .

Of course, they are our rulers. We can't have laws meant for peasants be applied to rulers.

We get it, party is WAY too important to let equal justice under the law interfere.

Can an FBI agent just call a press conf and talk of the details of Hilary's investigation ?

Since it is not an ongoing investigation, absolutely.

 

[Valerie]

for all that unhinged2008 lacks in intellect, he makes up in imagination.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Funny. He stated today that he doesn't know if Hillary's private server was hacked. Pay attention...

He doesn't KNOW, ShittingBull. It is LIKELY that they did, but he doesn't know.

 

[Uncensored2008]

for all that unhinged2008 lacks in intellect, he makes up in imagination.

I shit out more IQ points every morning than you ever had.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Let her stay above the Law......just keep classified information away from her. Clearly, she cannot be trusted to handle it.

 

[Valerie]

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."




Comey staunchly defended the bureau’s decision not to pursue charges.

He also said, “We have no basis to conclude that [Clinton] lied to the FBI.”


Comey testifies Clinton email claims ‘not true’ at heated Hill hearing | Fox News



your ongoing inability to parse simple facts is displayed on this forum daily.

 

[oreo]

Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

These Reich wing dog & pony shows are backfiring on Republicans. They cost the taxpayers of this country millions of dollars to do, and if they don't stop--the Republican party will be destroyed over them.

The Bullshit that hacks use to cover for their rulers.

Judge: Did you INTEND to hit and kill that child while you were driving drunk?

Defendant: No your honor.

Judge: Well, then you are free to go, since there was no intent..

So your drunk driver is guilty if 1st degree murder? No he's not . So yes intent is part of most crimes .

It's part of that criminal law that you think HILLARY violated .
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

1st degree muderers has a definition, moron.

It's like doing 55 in a 20 zone and getting off because you didn't see the speed zone sign.

Again--you get a "careless driving ticket" for that. You don't go to jail, unless you're drunk.

Workplace BLUNDERS are never investigated or prosecuted because there is no intent to do harm.

These Republican dog & pony shows are costing the taxpayers a lot of money. And that's all they are for. They're nothing more than for political gain.

240 U.S. Marines were killed in a U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, under the Reagan administration. Only 1 investigation--and not another word mentioned about it. Democrats didn't even use it as a campaign rally cry.

 

[BlueGin]

[

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

What we see here is that leftist morons like Timmy actually demand that laws be different for rulers than for the ruled.

No. It's because their jobs are different .

Can an FBI agent just call a press conf and talk of the details of Hilary's investigation ?

Another good Democrat acknowledging they think the law should only apply to the little people.

But but but white privilege .

Democrats are such frauds.

 

[Uncensored2008]

 

[Theowl32]

Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.

Straight out of Animal Farm. All to the giggles of the proud, arrogant, lawless, idol worshipping left.

 

[OKTexas]

Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.

And her email instructing people to remove classified markings and send it nonsecure was a clear demonstration of intent. Doesn't matter if it actually happened on not.

 

[BlindBoo]

Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).

Her own IT specialist had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked.

Also, as Comey said, using personal unencrypted devices on trips to places like Tussia and China almost guarantees thise were hacked & secrets were compromised.

In reality there was some software installed that detected a hacking attempt in progress. The fastest way to stop an attack is to disable the network and shut down the computer.

 

[BlueGin]

[
this partisan witch hunt is based on rabid hacks putting party over country.

Yes, poor put upon Hillary, all she did was attempt to ensure that FOA requests could be thwarted. So what if top secret emails were intercepted by the Chinese, Russia, or ISIS. If American assets died because ISIS intercepted top secret drone strike information, who cares? You sure the fuck don't, the party is what matters.

I mean really, the only thing that matters is party, am I right?

Hillary is head of the party, so laws, the Constitution, all that hokey shit, that is for rubes. The party is what matters. You need to make sure that the party is protected and will not let some fucking law interfere with the party. Laws are not meant for party bosses.

Party above all, in all things - that's the Khmer Rouge democrat way!

Party and their vaginas. That's pretty much it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
In reality there was some software installed that detected a hacking attempt in progress. The fastest way to stop an attack is to disable the network and shut down the computer.

They didn't even have 3DES encryption enabled. Exchange is simple to turn encryption on with. She didn't do it because she wanted to use her outdated BlackBerry.

You know better than this. I've talked tech with you before.

 

[OKTexas]

Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.

That's not what he said. Your second-hand info is bullshit.
Here's the link to the hearing from the very beginning. Go in there and show us at the timeline where he said this:
FBI Director James Comey Testifies Hillary | Video | C-SPAN.org

Last night right wingers were babbling everywhere that Comey used the word "reckless" to describe Clintons' actions. That was not true, either. That was Paul Ryan's word. Fox started repeating it. It's how lies and misinformation gets started.

How would you define "extreme carelessness"?

 

[BlindBoo]

[
In reality there was some software installed that detected a hacking attempt in progress. The fastest way to stop an attack is to disable the network and shut down the computer.

They didn't even have 3DES encryption enabled. Exchange is simple to turn encryption on with. She didn't do it because she wanted to use her outdated BlackBerry.

You know better than this. I've talked tech with you before.

As such you know that there is a difference in an attempted hack and a successful hack.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

As such you know that there is a difference in an attempted hack and a successful hack.

Hack is the the wrong term, it is VERY likely her emails were intercepted. Since they were unencrypted, that is all it took. They never needed to get into her server, a quick man in the middle and they had everything she sent or received.