Holy sh**!!! Comey: "If an FBI agent did what Hillary did they'd face 'severe consequences'!!??

What was Comey's roll in republican Scooter Libbey conviction. That's what I would ask.

Comey consulted with no one. They could have used that answer against him So it sounds like he didn't consult with that many FBI agents either, even the ones the interviewed Hillary

This guys a hack.
 
She lied to Congress and the American public. And was not under oath when she was interviewed by the FBI, nor was it recorded, nor was Comey there.
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....


So, you support one law for commoners, and a VERY different law for the ruling elite?

Did Hillary lie to the FBI?

Yes, or no?
 
COMEY:
- Yes I added wilfully to the statute even thought it's not part of it
- Yes if some random govt employee did what she did there'd be severe consequences

That sums it up.

If you or I did it....we'd be fucked (Comey said so)
The law doesn't include intent....so Comey just added it to clear Hillary (Comey said so)


The modern day Benedict Arnold.....James Coward Comey.
 
So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

Point out the part of the law she so dastardly violated ? Have u even looked at the elements of the law ?

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
 
So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

Point out the part of the law she so dastardly violated ? Have u even looked at the elements of the law ?

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

She's perjured herself...Congress is a sending referral to the FBI to begin the investigation.
 
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg


These Reich wing dog & pony shows are backfiring on Republicans. They cost the taxpayers of this country millions of dollars to do, and if they don't stop--the Republican party will be destroyed over them.
 
Last edited:
By his words, because she is no longer employed by the govt, there can be no consequences.
 
Honey, look at this statute, and do remember she signed a statement acknowledging how to handle records upon taking office-

18 U.S.C. § 1924: Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Material
The same charge Sandy Berger was found guilty of

(a)

Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documentsor materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.


So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

Point out the part of the law she so dastardly violated ? Have u even looked at the elements of the law ?

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....
Wait a minute. So a person was careless when he intended to commit espionage? If someone is poised to commit espionage, I doubt if he is going to be careless.

"Intent" is not a marker for an FBI agent doing the same thing as Clinton did. "Mishandling TS material, or being extremely careless would be punished by firing or security clearance withdrawn."
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....



exactly. just goes to show the typical gaping whole in their everyday attempts at logic.

newsflash: "the average American" is not acting as Secretary of State of the U.S.A. until maybe they are, in which case the end result of these same circumstances would be the very same non prosecution.

so sorry rabid hacks, the U.S.A. doesn't take prosecuting our SoS frivolously.



"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."
 
Last edited:
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg
Comey is not a Republican. To argue that because he was once appointed by Bush to a job is voided with the fact he is the FBI Director appointed by Obama.
 
Comey: Hillarys server was "less secure than a Gmail account"

Wow. Just unreal.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....



exactly. just goes to show the typical gaping whole in their everyday attempts at logic.

newsflash: "the average American" is not acting as Secretary of State of the U.S.A. until maybe they are, in which case the end result of these same circumstances would be the very same non prosecution.

so sorry rabid hacks, the U.S.A. doesn't take prosecuting our SoS frivolously.



"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."
Openly admitting the elite 1% should be above the law. How Democrat of you.
 
Anyone watching this shit???

Comey just got cornered and said if an FBI agent had done what Hillary did he would face "severe consequences"......then 2 minutes later said everyone would be treated equally of they committed this same crime.

He's also rewritten the law. House asked him "what does it take"???

He said that it requires 2 things: Mishandling of classified info (which he bluntly agreed Hillary did).....and INTENT.

No sir Mr. Comey. These laws do NOT require intent. Countless legal experts have declared this and the law does not say that.


Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg
Comey is not a Republican. To argue that because he was once appointed by Bush to a job is voided with the fact he is the FBI Director appointed by Obama.

If anything its shown George W. Bush was very fair in appointing a non-partisan FBI director. Too bad the left isn't capable of this type of integrity in their actions.
 
[

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

What we see here is that leftist morons like Timmy actually demand that laws be different for rulers than for the ruled.
 
Now the Democrat from New Jersey has decided to use her time to grill Comey on how bad American police are treating blacks haha. Wow.
 
in the 99 years since the espionage act was created, only 1 person was prosecuted for gross negligence and that person was careless and had intent to commit espionage....

It's you, who want to change the law and precedence on this issue....

exactly. just goes to show the typical gaping whole in their everyday attempts at logic.

newsflash: "the average American" is not acting as Secretary of State of the U.S.A. until maybe they are, in which case the end result of these same circumstances would be the very same non prosecution.

so sorry rabid hacks, the U.S.A. doesn't take prosecuting our SoS frivolously.



"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."
Openly admitting the elite 1% should be above the law. How Democrat of you.


you're openly admitting your inability to comprehend simple concepts?




here is what facing up to "the law" actually concluded:

"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."
 

Forum List

Back
Top