Holy crap!! Arctic ocean almost totally ice covered!!

From NSIDC -- It's a late summer up in the Arctic this year.




N_stddev_timeseries.png
 
From NSIDC -- It's a late summer up in the Arctic this year.




N_stddev_timeseries.png
Air temps are falling, not rising. this is late fall behavior.

Aren't we talking about the ARCTIC? You know -- Northern Hemi ^^^ Southern Hemi vvvvvv
Southern should be solid cold....

Funny thing is, the northern hemisphere is acting the same way by being -6 deg F cooler than average along with polar lows decreasing in pressure (indicating strengthening) when the opposite should be happening this time of year.:04:
 
From NSIDC -- It's a late summer up in the Arctic this year.




N_stddev_timeseries.png
Air temps are falling, not rising. this is late fall behavior.

Aren't we talking about the ARCTIC? You know -- Northern Hemi ^^^ Southern Hemi vvvvvv
Southern should be solid cold....

Funny thing is, the northern hemisphere is acting the same way by being -6 deg F cooler than average along with polar lows decreasing in pressure (indicating strengthening) when the opposite should be happening this time of year.:04:

The Russian climate scientists were right....ice age upon us!
 
From NSIDC -- It's a late summer up in the Arctic this year.




N_stddev_timeseries.png
Air temps are falling, not rising. this is late fall behavior.

Aren't we talking about the ARCTIC? You know -- Northern Hemi ^^^ Southern Hemi vvvvvv
Southern should be solid cold....

Funny thing is, the northern hemisphere is acting the same way by being -6 deg F cooler than average along with polar lows decreasing in pressure (indicating strengthening) when the opposite should be happening this time of year.:04:
gfs_nh-sat1_t2anom_1-day.png


Another Silly Billy stinky 'fact' straight from his ample ass. LOL Northern Hemisphere +0.4 warmer, Arctic, +0.3 warmer than average.
 
Now Frankie boi, why can you not read a simple chart? Both show the ice, one shows the extent of the ice coverage, by percentage of water showing, the other, the thickness of the existing ice. Note the very thin areas are the same areas that show less than 15% coverage, therefore, don't show on the extent map. Most of where the purple is, you would have a hard time locating any ice.
 
Now Frankie boi, why can you not read a simple chart? Both show the ice, one shows the extent of the ice coverage, by percentage of water showing, the other, the thickness of the existing ice. Note the very thin areas are the same areas that show less than 15% coverage, therefore, don't show on the extent map. Most of where the purple is, you would have a hard time locating any ice.

Yes, we know your chart is faked data to cover up that the Arctic is nearly completely iced over. It's like the imaginary heat "trapped" in the deep ocean or the Arctic "Warming" from -25 to -23F. You're hiding the decline, actually in the increase - in ice. Your theory fails so you keep adding new altered data points.

Want to convince me? Show me one experiment that demonstrates the difference in temperature between a 280PPM and 400PPM CO2 environment
 
Now Frankie boi, why can you not read a simple chart? Both show the ice, one shows the extent of the ice coverage, by percentage of water showing, the other, the thickness of the existing ice. Note the very thin areas are the same areas that show less than 15% coverage, therefore, don't show on the extent map. Most of where the purple is, you would have a hard time locating any ice.

Which means their operational definition of "ice" is makey-uppey. Ghey....these frauds are fucking with basic science to promote an agenda.

Fake:coffee:
 
Now Frankie boi, why can you not read a simple chart? Both show the ice, one shows the extent of the ice coverage, by percentage of water showing, the other, the thickness of the existing ice. Note the very thin areas are the same areas that show less than 15% coverage, therefore, don't show on the extent map. Most of where the purple is, you would have a hard time locating any ice.

Yes, we know your chart is faked data to cover up that the Arctic is nearly completely iced over. It's like the imaginary heat "trapped" in the deep ocean or the Arctic "Warming" from -25 to -23F. You're hiding the decline, actually in the increase - in ice. Your theory fails so you keep adding new altered data points.

Want to convince me? Show me one experiment that demonstrates the difference in temperature between a 280PPM and 400PPM CO2 environment

Cant deal seriously with these people. They promote their own "facts" which dont correlate with accepted facts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top