Holder (and Obama) Get Their Wish

xzc9NGF.jpg
If that is what he does, he is badly needed in Quebec.

Gladly TRADE the obomanation for your PM!
 
Do you have any real news sources?


Don't like NYTimes, Daily Caller, or Investor's Business Daily?

Seems to be the strategy of morons who can't find any way to deny the facts.

That's what I said: facts!

Holder, Obama and Sharpton, the racial axis, are responsible for the toxic climate.



And you know it.

What has Obama actually done that supports your claim?
What a dumb question. You might as well ask what has ISIS done to support the wish to defeat them ?
geez.gif
This sisone of those questions you feel silly even responding to.

EARTH TO NYC: There's no question that the ludicrous DOJ "report" accusing the Ferguson, MO Police Dept of racism, is part of an overall political SCAM. And the scammers are Mr. Community Organizer-Scammer himself Barrack Obama, and his lap dog Erratic Eric Holder. And those being scammed ? Primarily Black people in America, with a few mindless whites mixed in.

The idea is to get Blacks upset, aroused, disturbed, pissed-off, and most of all, to VOTE DEMOCRATIC, in the next election. If just 1000 votes could be generated in each state, from this manipulation campaign, that could be enough to swing an election from one side to the other. It should be noted that elections, in recent years, have been very close contests.
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.
 
"Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.
"

Yeah cuz there has never ever been racism on Planet Earth until President Obama was elected.

True, but I for one had high hopes his presidency would yield progress on America's race relations. Pity.
Me too but he will have the legacy as The Great Divider.
 
Do you have any real news sources?


Don't like NYTimes, Daily Caller, or Investor's Business Daily?

Seems to be the strategy of morons who can't find any way to deny the facts.

That's what I said: facts!

Holder, Obama and Sharpton, the racial axis, are responsible for the toxic climate.



And you know it.
Moonpie and Friends would never consider reading the Wall Street Journal. Too many truthful facts.
 
Do you have any real news sources?


Don't like NYTimes, Daily Caller, or Investor's Business Daily?

Seems to be the strategy of morons who can't find any way to deny the facts.

That's what I said: facts!

Holder, Obama and Sharpton, the racial axis, are responsible for the toxic climate.



And you know it.
Moonpie and Friends would never consider reading the Wall Street Journal. Too many truthful facts.
Considering I don't live in NY, why would I??
 
Do you have any real news sources?


Don't like NYTimes, Daily Caller, or Investor's Business Daily?

Seems to be the strategy of morons who can't find any way to deny the facts.

That's what I said: facts!

Holder, Obama and Sharpton, the racial axis, are responsible for the toxic climate.



And you know it.
Moonpie and Friends would never consider reading the Wall Street Journal. Too many truthful facts.
Considering I don't live in NY, why would I??


Are you serious????


OK....time to continue your education: the WSJ, like the NYT, is a global publication.

Do you live on this globe?


"Nation's newspapers report that they suffered slight declines in total circulation, but are benefiting from an increase in digital subscriptions; Wall Street Journal has the highest circulation, at 2,378,827; New York Times reports circulation of 1,865,318, a 17.6 percent rise over a year earlier."
Wall Street Journal News - The New York Times
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.
 
How things change, depending on which party is the topic.

Remember this:

"Sarah Palin's 'Crosshairs' Ad Dominates Gabrielle Giffords Debate
In the stunned aftermath of the Tucson massacre, Sarah Palin has found herself in the crosshairs of the ensuing political debate with opponents suggesting she may have fueled the gunman's rage and her supporters saying it is "grotesque" to blame her and to politicize the tragedy.

Crosshairs is a political phrase that emerged from Palin's political action committee SarahPac that targeted congressional districts for the Tea Party campaign in the last election, including the district of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

Although Palin later denied she meant the graphic over the districts to look like a gun sight, it is part of the hunting lexicon that critics say she prefers."
Sarah Palin s Crosshairs Ad is Focus of Gabrielle Giffords Debate - ABC News



But when Holder, Obama and Sharpton put police 'in the cross-hairs,' and police are killed and maimed....

...the silence is deafening.

 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?
 
"Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.
"

Yeah cuz there has never ever been racism on Planet Earth until President Obama was elected.

:dance:

The Tea Party was holding protests featuring these sorts of themes:

tea party racist - Google Search

not long after Obama had taken office.

The RWnuts can always find a looney line of propaganda that will please their cult, no matter what the issue.
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:


 
Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.


 

Forum List

Back
Top