Holder (and Obama) Get Their Wish

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.
 
The out of context queen strikes again!

Stirring the shit pot.


Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

A story only a hard line Romney fan could believe.

Obama’s “you didn’t build that” line, in context, refers to the fact that business owners generally did not build the roads on which they ship their good to market.
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.
 
Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

A story only a hard line Romney fan could believe.

Obama’s “you didn’t build that” line, in context, refers to the fact that business owners generally did not build the roads on which they ship their good to market.

The simpletons like Political C in the rightwing cult only believe what makes them feel good.

Rightwing lies are the opiate of the rightwing masses.
 
When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.



PC, you have to remember that when a puking liberal makes a comment and is quoted, he will come back and say, "You're lying." When confronted he will say he was misquoted. When shown a video he will say, "What I meant was..............." When pressed further he will say, "Fox lies." When even further pressed she will say, "At this point in time, what difference does it make?" We all need to take a course in Democreep Speak.
 
"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.




I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.
 
Time and again, when folks realize political infatuations have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at the truth that you are unable to deny leaks out as vulgarity.

That is why I never have to do the same.

When you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them, it is hardly the truth. It is all you do. Stirring the shit pot is completely representative of that.


"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

A story only a hard line Romney fan could believe.

Obama’s “you didn’t build that” line, in context, refers to the fact that business owners generally did not build the roads on which they ship their good to market.



A story only a hard line Stalinist could believe.
 
Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.




I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


All sane people who are familiar with what the President said know what he said and what it meant,

and it's NOT what you and the rest of ODS'ers claim.

But keep denying irrefutable fact. It pleases me when you do.
 
Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.




I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.

See what I told you in Post #45? Unbelieveable!
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


Then it shouldn't be hard for you to produce numerous quotes from any of the three that prove they advocated violence.

Hell, give us ONE quote and we'll go from there.
 
"...you take quotes out of context and assign a different meaning to them,..."

But you didn't provide any such,...just your opinion, and the vulgarity.

And you are a Democrat lap-dog, and major wind-bag......

....so, you opinion is taken for what it's worth: zero.

Anyone with an once of integrity can take one look at your post(s) and determine their disingenuous nature.




Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.



PC, you have to remember that when a puking liberal makes a comment and is quoted, he will come back and say, "You're lying." When confronted he will say he was misquoted. When shown a video he will say, "What I meant was..............." When pressed further he will say, "Fox lies." When even further pressed she will say, "At this point in time, what difference does it make?" We all need to take a course in Democreep Speak.


You only have to understand the English language to know what he meant, because he says what he meant.

Now PC's understanding of plain English is comically deficient probably because it's not her first language...

...what's your excuse?
 
Yet you can't find any examples to support your lies.....

You must be a Liberal, right wind-bag?



I can find examples of you swearing to lies.....remember how you said that the fake in the White House didn't really mean to support the collectivist communist ideology when he attacked successful entrepreneurs with "you didn't build that.'


He can always count on you reliable Democrat voters, huh.


Reliable....re-lie-able

He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.




I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.

See what I told you in Post #45? Unbelieveable!




Yup.

NYLiar does what he does best.
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


Then it shouldn't be hard for you to produce numerous quotes from any of the three that prove they advocated violence.

Hell, give us ONE quote and we'll go from there.




And once again, Queen Ann hits the nail on your head.

"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?

They retreat from argument, burning the English language as they go." - Ann Coulter
 
He did no such thing. Liar.


You know I never lie.




Which proves he did no such thing, Liar. Thank you for the proof.




I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.

See what I told you in Post #45? Unbelieveable!




Yup.

NYLiar does what he does best.


Hardly. What you like to call 'your side' is unequaled in dishonesty:

Error US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

see post 28
 
Turns out that there are race-card croupiers even more adept than Al Sharpton.....

Eric Holder and Barack Obama



1. Let's begin with this reminder of the racist-in-chief urging the Ferguson protesters to continue:

"...Obama told national civil rights leaders he wanted to see protests in Ferguson, Mo., “staying on course” ....
When Obama met with a group of civil rights activists including Rev. Al Sharpton at the White House on Nov. 5, the day after his party’s defeat in the midterm elections, he expressed his commitment to keeping the protests in Ferguson “on course.”....according to the 21st paragraph of a New York Times article."
Sharpton said Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama Told Activists To Keep Ferguson Protests On Course The Daily Caller



2. And what is that 'wish' that Holder, Obama, and Sharpon yearned for?
"An Open War On Police Officers

3. The latest casualties in Eric Holder's anti-cop race war are two Ferguson, Mo., officers shot at a protest rally. The ambush follows the attorney general smearing the entire Ferguson police force as racist.

4. "It's time for the (people) to finally fight back against these racist ass pigs!" another protester tweeted.
Just hours earlier, Ferguson's police chief stepped down in response to Holder's 100-page report claiming Ferguson police engaged in systemic racism against local blacks."Holder Gets His Wish An Open War On Police Officers - Investors.com




And what is true about the report which incited the ambush of police?

5. "Nothing in this travesty of a report proves that, and the fact that Justice produced a report so buffoonish, so replete with conclusions unsupported by facts, so lacking in basic methodological rigor, is an embarrassment," blasted U.S. Commission on Civil Rights member Peter Kirsanow, who is black.
...."the report has accomplished its objective," Kirsanow added.



6. Holder excused anti-cop violence that broke out after the Brown shooting, suggesting it was justified by his overall findings.

"Members of the community may not have been responding only to a single isolated confrontation, but also to a pervasive, corrosive and deeply unfortunate lack of trust — attributable to ... abuses, unreasonable searches and seizures, and excessive and dangerous use of force ... against African Americans," he said, only encouraging more violence against cops.



7. The first casualties in Holder's war on cops were the two New York Police Department officers assassinated in December by a young black man seeking revenge for what Holder claimed were racially motivated police shootings of black men.



8. ...Holder personally egged on anti-cop protesters in St. Louis and New York with his race rhetoric. He even huddled with racial arsonist Al Sharpton to coordinate an agitation campaign as he did in Sanford, Fla., after the Trayvon Martin shooting.

9. Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.....Blacks have good reason to distrust police, he said, given the history of discrimination in America.

10. ....the blood of these victims is on Holder's hands. It's clear he has a personal grudge against cops and that he wrote his specious report to confirm his own biases."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/031215-743192-ferguson-police-officers-shot.htm#ixzz3UHJPZkRy



Let us never forget who put Obama and Holder in power.
They are the ones truly responsible for the state of affairs in race relations.

Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


Then it shouldn't be hard for you to produce numerous quotes from any of the three that prove they advocated violence.

Hell, give us ONE quote and we'll go from there.

Of course from obama or holder there isnt one. It would have been right on the tip of her dullard spear if there were.
 
Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


Then it shouldn't be hard for you to produce numerous quotes from any of the three that prove they advocated violence.

Hell, give us ONE quote and we'll go from there.




And once again, Queen Ann hits the nail on your head.

"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?

They retreat from argument, burning the English language as they go." - Ann Coulter


I asked you to defend your accusation with evidence.

You can't. You never can. You're a retard.

One quote is all I ask. ONE QUOTE of Obama, Holder, or Sharpton calling for violence.
 
Since the end result of the Ferguson affair has been that the Justice Department found rampant racist corruption going on in the local government, especially in the police department,

wasn't 'staying the course' a proper strategy?




Here's the course, dope:




Neither Obama, Holder, or Sharpton EVER encouraged, justified, excused, or condoned the violence in Ferguson.




The facts suggest otherwise.
I love it when you reveal the reason you're known a NYLiar.

Don't ever change.


Then it shouldn't be hard for you to produce numerous quotes from any of the three that prove they advocated violence.

Hell, give us ONE quote and we'll go from there.

Of course from obama or holder there isnt one. It would have been right on the tip of her dullard spear if there were.


She's a rightwing pundit groupie. She just parrots what they say, usually having no idea, nor care, that it's not true, and frequently having no idea what it even means.
 

Forum List

Back
Top