Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
- 280
- Banned
- #2,441
Now, as luck would have it, on today's Front Page of "The Blaze" is an article which demonstrates the classic Fascist nature of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.
This article demonstrates in no uncertain terms the "THREAT" posed by Sexual Abnormality, and why Nature requires the Sexually Abnormal to be stripped of their lives and why the Founders of the United States complied with nature's law.
Here we find a person who owns a printing business, who refused to print upon t-shirts, language which promotes the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality. The Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality sued him, the Leftists jurists who heard the case, 'decided' that he was discriminating against the Sexually Abnormal by not assisting them in their March to the Sea, burning down decency and cultural viability as they go. The court them 'required' that this business man, pay to 're-train' himself and his employees, so that they could be reformed as good National Socialists, comporting themselves with the ideals of the Party or face bankruptcy, the destruction of his business and to avoid prison.
This businessman is appealing the decision and is determined to sue 'em back! Defending his God-given rights, protected by the Constitution of the United States to freely practice his religion.
Christian Printer Was Punished After Refusing to Print Gay Pride T-Shirts and Now He 8217 s Fighting Back TheBlaze.com
Posted by a Talibanie of unknown national allegiance, but for certain not one who believes in the American ethos, best sourced in these hollowed words, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
ROFLMNAO!
So, you feel that being equal before their Creator, provides for the sexually abnormal to be provided with the superior standing which would force others to publish, in approval, and otherwise promote behavior which the Creator himself has published law, requiring that such behavior should result in the execution of those engaging in that behavior?
How could behaving in defiance of natural law, in ANY WAY lead to life, or liberty or the pursuit of happiness?
"published by the Creator". Keys is daft.
Seems arrogant assholes presume to know who or what makes one free, and what provides each individual happiness.
Organized religions are no different than organized political parties, they need numbers to be successful. Thus, "go forth and multiply", and the use of contraceptives is a sin, are utilitarian and best enforced by the threat of punishment (going to hell, wherever that may be).
Someone recently posted this sagacious comment, "Freedom FROM Religion" and Rousseau made the observation that man is born free but is everywhere in chains; chains held by Monarchs and Clerics!
So you can't say if your citation reasonably provides for the superior standing of the sexually abnormal over those who recognize sexual abnormality as abhorrent?
WOW~ That's odd, considering that such was a central component of your implication. Didn't seem like it was that much of a step to simply admit it.
But... I guess if you'd admitted it, you'd have to be honest and honesty is a component of truth, which requires objectivity and objectivity is axiomatically rejected by the Ideological Left, which is a species of reasoning that rests entirely in Relativism. So I suppose it was unlikely, after all.
You would't recognize honesty. Being an arrogant asshole and dishonest I don't care what you post about me.
I doubt very much Jefferson's words supported the sort of bigotry inherent in Keys' thread, though its clear the ethos of the 18th Century are much different than those of the 21st. Does that mean I reject the arguments and support moral/ethical relativism? Not necessarily, I simply want evidence that the Natural Laws argument isn't a beard for bigotry.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Folks, do you SEE how easy this is? Try it yourselves, simply encourage the Leftist closest to you to speak. In short order they'll make some ludicrous assertion; such as that by the above imbecile, wherein she claimed that the Declaration of Independence provided for the Sexually Abnormal to force those who hold their behavior as abhorrent, in servitude and where they refuse to drive them into bankruptcy and prison. When asked how that might work...; to sustain their reasoning: "You're an asshole!".
ROFL! You can't BUY that sort of refutation... THAT, ya gotta earn!)