History Channel To Portray Hannibal Accurately

[Asclepias]

Even with the altered painting he looks like he is part Black. Thanks

According to the "one drop rule", we're all black. So what's the problem?

There is no problem. I love being Black.

 

[Divine Wind]

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop.

What hurt feelings? Feel free to post a quote from my posts where I've done anything except express purely intellectual curiosity here? You're the racist, my young friend. If you want to make all of us "black" based on the "one drop rule", fine. We're all black.

Happy now? Do you feel better about yourself? Will you finally believe you are a worthy human being and accept all men and women as your brothers and sisters or will you continue on this rampage of hate and a search for self-worth?

 

[Asclepias]

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop.

What hurt feelings? Feel free to post a quote from my posts where I've done anything except express purely intellectual curiosity here? You're the racist, my young friend. If you want to make all of us "black" based on the "one drop rule", fine. We're all black.

Happy now? Do you feel better about yourself? Will you finally believe you are a worthy human being and accept all men and women as your brothers and sisters or will you continue on this rampage of hate and a search for self-worth?

Pick any number of your emotional posts and try again to convince me it was "intellectual curiosity".

Saying thanks for the History Channel portraying Hannibal as he truly was is not a "rampage of hate". See? Youre being emotional and dramatic again.

 

[Divine Wind]

There is no problem. I love being Black.

Dude, no one who spreads hate loves themselves. The reason they are spreading hate is because they are miserable.

Example: Homophobes. Many studies have shown homophobes have homosexual feelings and express feelings through hatred of others even though the basis is self-loathing.

 

[Divine Wind]

Pick any number of your emotional posts and try again to convince me it was "intellectual curiosity"....

LOL. Answering a question with a question is a sign of both spinelessness and lack of intellectual acumen. Have a nice day, kid.

 

[Asclepias]

There is no problem. I love being Black.

Dude, no one who spreads hate loves themselves. The reason they are spreading hate is because they are miserable.

Example: Homophobes. Many studies have shown homophobes have homosexual feelings and express feelings through hatred of others even though the basis is self-loathing.

Youre being a drama queen again. Black people loving themselves doesnt equal Black people hating everyone else.

 

[Asclepias]

Pick any number of your emotional posts and try again to convince me it was "intellectual curiosity"....

LOL. Answering a question with a question is a sign of both spinelessness and lack of intellectual acumen. Have a nice day, kid.

Crying and being a drama queen because Hannibal is Black is not intellectual curiosity. Its white boy butt hurt to the max.

So you are calling BOEDICCA spineless? He answered my question with a question and you supported him. Face it. Your hypocrisy proves to everyone you are butthurt and emotional. Practically everyone can see that.

 

[Kondor3]

...Old white definitions hold no credibility. The indigenous Berbers were Black and this has been verified via DNA. Haplogroup E1B1 Sorry man...

Whatever in the world are you babbling about?

Berbers are - and have been, back into time immemorial, a 'mutt' mixed-breed race...

Is there a strain of Central African blood in them?

Yep.

Does that mean that they are not - or were not - largely White?

Nope.

 

[Asclepias]

...Old white definitions hold no credibility. The indigenous Berbers were Black and this has been verified via DNA. Haplogroup E1B1 Sorry man...

Whatever in the world are you babbling about?

Berbers are - and have been, back into time immemorial, a 'mutt' mixed-breed race...

Is there a strain of Central African blood in them?

Yep.

Does that mean that they are not - or were not - largely White?

Nope.

Anyone with at least a 5th grade education knows that is false. The indigenous Berber were and still are Black.

 

[Kondor3]

Yes they are still Black but not as Black as the indigenous Berbers.

The Askanazis jews are not Black. The original Hebrews are Black.

Well, according to the "one drop rule", we're all black, so what's the problem?

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop. No wonder you have argued with me for pages Hannibal was not Black when you have not shred of proof he wasnt.

Do you have a shred of proof that he was?

Has a descendant of Hannibal been identified?

Which tribe did he hail from?

My guess is, he hailed from a tribe we call Phoenicians.

As did the founders of Carthage, and the ruling families that sprang from that collection of founders.

And they were just a wee bit lighter skinned than the feral Blacks of that long-ago hinterland to the south of Carthage.

You modern-day Black Revisionists are off your rockers, but you DO make for good entertainment.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes they are still Black but not as Black as the indigenous Berbers.

The Askanazis jews are not Black. The original Hebrews are Black.

Well, according to the "one drop rule", we're all black, so what's the problem?

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop. No wonder you have argued with me for pages Hannibal was not Black when you have not shred of proof he wasnt.

Do you have a shred of proof that he was?

Has a descendant of Hannibal been identified?

Which tribe did he hail from?

My guess is, he hailed from a tribe we call Phoenicians.

As did the founders of Carthage, and the ruling families that sprang from that collection of founders.

And they were just a wee bit lighter skinned than the feral Blacks of that long-ago hinterland to the south of Carthage.

You modern-day Black Revisionists are off your rockers, but you DO make for good entertainment.

I submitted all the proof already.

Why do you want to know?

The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoenicians" which I have already pointed out were Black being a Hamitic people. Thanks for reiterating that though.

 

[Divine Wind]

Crying and being a drama queen because Hannibal is Black is not intellectual curiosity. Its white boy butt hurt to the max...

Quote a single post where I did as you claim and I'll never bother you again.

 

[Asclepias]

Crying and being a drama queen because Hannibal is Black is not intellectual curiosity. Its white boy butt hurt to the max...

Quote a single post where I did as you claim and I'll never bother you again.

You dont have to stop discussing the issue. You dont bother me. Youre actually funny. However, here you are being a drama queen.

Correct. Like your assertions that Hannibal was "black" based on a TV show,

 

[Kondor3]

Yes they are still Black but not as Black as the indigenous Berbers.

The Askanazis jews are not Black. The original Hebrews are Black.

Well, according to the "one drop rule", we're all black, so what's the problem?

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop. No wonder you have argued with me for pages Hannibal was not Black when you have not shred of proof he wasnt.

Do you have a shred of proof that he was?

Has a descendant of Hannibal been identified?

Which tribe did he hail from?

My guess is, he hailed from a tribe we call Phoenicians.

As did the founders of Carthage, and the ruling families that sprang from that collection of founders.

And they were just a wee bit lighter skinned than the feral Blacks of that long-ago hinterland to the south of Carthage.

You modern-day Black Revisionists are off your rockers, but you DO make for good entertainment.

I submitted all the proof already.

Why do you want to know?

The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoenicians" which I have already pointed out were Black being a Hamitic people. Thanks for reiterating that though.

No, I don't believe that the Canaanites, Phoenicians nor Hebrews were Black.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes they are still Black but not as Black as the indigenous Berbers.

The Askanazis jews are not Black. The original Hebrews are Black.

Well, according to the "one drop rule", we're all black, so what's the problem?

There is no problem except with your hurt feelings. You just have a smaller amount of that drop. No wonder you have argued with me for pages Hannibal was not Black when you have not shred of proof he wasnt.

Do you have a shred of proof that he was?

Has a descendant of Hannibal been identified?

Which tribe did he hail from?

My guess is, he hailed from a tribe we call Phoenicians.

As did the founders of Carthage, and the ruling families that sprang from that collection of founders.

And they were just a wee bit lighter skinned than the feral Blacks of that long-ago hinterland to the south of Carthage.

You modern-day Black Revisionists are off your rockers, but you DO make for good entertainment.

I submitted all the proof already.

Why do you want to know?

The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoenicians" which I have already pointed out were Black being a Hamitic people. Thanks for reiterating that though.

No, I don't believe that the Canaanites, Phoenicians nor Hebrews were Black.

I didnt ask you what you believe. I just informed you that they were Black.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I always thought Hannibal would have been like an olive or something. From the sculptures I have seen from ancient carthage and surrounding areas, they looked neither "black" nor "white".
I think its pretty much just a useless pissing match anyways. No one knows for sure.

Those coins that Asclepias provided make a compelling argument that Hannibal was a negro. Look at the exaggerated lips. What other Black would have coins made for them?

Not really...

If you take a look here he cherry picked one coin....
coins with Hannibal Barca image - Google Search

 

[abu afak]

I submitted all the proof already.
Why do you want to know?
The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoenicians" which I have already pointed out were Black being a Hamitic people. Thanks for reiterating that though.

Black Pistory Garbage with Yo Ignorance/Lies thrown in for extra sleazy Measure.
Both semites and hamites were a subgroup of Caucasoids.
What an IDIOT to assert early Jews were black too, when ALL genetics say otherwise.
Actually, besside being related to Palestinians, Jews were thought to have originated in the Northern Fertile Crescent (legend of Abraham the same), and are most closely related to the Kurds in some genetics testing.
IAC...

Hamitic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hamitic (from the biblical Ham) is a historical term in ethnology and linguistics for a division of the Caucasian Race and the group of related languages these populations spoke. "Hamitic" was applied to non-Semitic languages in the Afroasiatic family, which was thus formerly labelled "Hamito-Semitic".

The Hamitic languages were classified as including the Berber, Cushitic and Egyptian branches. However, since these branches have not been shown to form an exclusive (monophyletic) phylogenetic unit of their own, separate from other Afroasiatic languages, linguists no longer use the term in this sense. Each of these branches is instead now regarded as an independent sub-group of the larger Afroasiatic family.

In the 19th century, various writers classified the Hamitic race as a sub-group of the Caucasian race, along with the Semitic race – thus grouping the non-Semitic populations native to North Africa and the Horn of Africa, including the Ancient Egyptians. According to the Hamitic theory, this "Hamitic race" was superior to or more advanced than Negroid populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. In its most extreme form, in the writings of C. G. Seligman, this theory asserted that virtually all significant achievements in African history were the work of "Hamites" who migrated into central Africa as pastoralists, bringing new customs, languages, technologies and administrative skills with them. In the early 20th century, theoretical models of Hamitic languages and of Hamitic races were intertwined.

These paradigms gradually fell out of favour between the 1960s and 1980s, in large part due to their perceived association with colonial paternalism. Towards the end of the millennium, Hamitic theory received renewed scholarly interest, following the discovery of ancient skeletons in areas where such old "Hamitic" remains were previously assumed to have been mythical or otherwise non-existent. Excavations of cairns associated with the Savanna Pastoral Neolithic culture yielded the skeletons of tall individuals of "Caucasoid" type, whose physical traits appeared to Confirm the traditions of Hamitic Migrants entering the area...."
`
There is a desperate effort to incorporate North Africans/Meds/Arabs as black, because otherwise, reaL Afros are stuck with NO-accompishment sub-Saharan Africa.
​

 

[Asclepias]

I submitted all the proof already.
Why do you want to know?
The Greeks called the Canaanites "Phoenicians" which I have already pointed out were Black being a Hamitic people. Thanks for reiterating that though.

Black Pistory Garbage with Yo Ignorance/Lies thrown in for extra sleazy Measure.
Both semites and hamites were a subgropup of Caucasoids.
What an IDIOT to assert early Jews were black too, when ALL generics say otherwise.

Hamitic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hamitic (from the biblical Ham) is a historical term in ethnology and linguistics for a division of theCaucasian race and the group of related languages these populations spoke. "Hamitic" was applied to non-Semitic languages in the Afroasiatic family, which was thus formerly labelled "Hamito-Semitic".

The Hamitic languages were classified as including the Berber, Cushitic and Egyptian branches. However, since these branches have not been shown to form an exclusive (monophyletic) phylogenetic unit of their own, separate from other Afroasiatic languages, linguists no longer use the term in this sense. Each of these branches is instead now regarded as an independent sub-group of the larger Afroasiatic family.

In the 19th century, various writers classified the Hamitic race as a sub-group of the Caucasian race, along with the Semitic race – thus grouping the non-Semitic populations native to North Africa and the Horn of Africa, including the Ancient Egyptians. According to the Hamitic theory, this "Hamitic race" was superior to or more advanced than Negroid populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. In its most extreme form, in the writings of C. G. Seligman, this theory asserted that virtually all significant achievements in African history were the work of "Hamites" who migrated into central Africa as pastoralists, bringing new customs, languages, technologies and administrative skills with them. In the early 20th century, theoretical models of Hamitic languages and of Hamitic races were intertwined.

These paradigms gradually fell out of favour between the 1960s and 1980s, in large part due to their perceived association with colonial paternalism. Towards the end of the millennium, Hamitic theory received renewed scholarly interest, following the discovery of ancient skeletons in areas where such old "Hamitic" remains were previously assumed to have been mythical or otherwise non-existent. Excavations of cairns associated with the Savanna Pastoral Neolithic culture yielded the skeletons of tall individuals of "Caucasoid" type, whose physical traits appeared to Confirm the traditions of Hamitic migrants entering the area.​

Looks like someone edited Wiki again.

THE DESCENDANTS OF NOAH - Genesis Ten

"

• 
  THE DESCENDANTS OF HAM
  Genesis 10:6-20
  Ham's descendants settled towards the south west along the Mediterranean into North Africa and southward into the rest of the continent. Ham had four sons, but grandsons are listed for only three.
  
  
  
  THE CUSHITES
  The Cushites settled in south Arabia, southern Egypt, the Sudan and northern Ethiopia. Seba is associated with Upper Egypt. Havilah, meaning "sea land" could refer to northern Arabia on the Persian Gulf or Ethiopia. Raamah and Sabtechah were in southern Arabia. Sheba, home of the Queen of Sheba, of I Kings 10, was in southwest Arabia and Dedan in the north. Various tribes in these areas trace their heritage back to Shem, which would indicate some mixing of the tribes.(1)
  
  
  NIMROD
  Verse 9:8-10, refer to Cush's son Nimrod. Nimrod's name means "to rebel" or "let us rebel". Nimrod, is called a "mighty hunter". This is in sharp contrast to the prophecy of Noah, that Ham's descendants would be servants to Shem and Japheth. Nimrod built and apparently ruled the first great city after the Floor, Babylon. Afterward he extended his rule into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth and Calah. Nimrod was the first world ruler. The Bible does not say that Nimrod was responsible for the Tower of Babel, but it seems logical that he was being the founder and ruler of the city. The Babylonians invented the first false religion which was a worship of the stars, astrology. Babylon is infamous in Scripture as being a wicked city openly rebelling and fighting against God. The people of these great cities were major enemies of Israel throughout history. Nimrod was not a servant as Noah had prophesied, but the opposite a "mighty hunter".(2)It seems Nimrod's goal in life was to disprove the prophecy of his grandfather and it is possible Ham's resentment of his father Noah was kindled in his grandson.
  
  
  
  MIZRAIM
  Ham's son Mizraim's descendants are associated with North Africa to the island of Crete. The note in verse 14, states that from Casluhium came the Philistim or Philistines.
  
  
  
  THE CANAANITES
  The origin of the hated and sinful Canaanite who lived in Palestine came for the lineage of Ham. The Canaanites practiced probably the most sordid and evil religions based on murder and sexual perversion. The idol Baal, was the son of El, the head of a pantheon of decadent deities. Their civilizations was so corrupted that God commanded the Children of Israel to completely destroy them including their animals. Other descendants of the Canaanites were the Chinese, from the Sinites, verse 10:17. Further, the Sinites were probably the ancestors of all the Mongoloid peoples including the people of the South Sea Islands and the Americas.
  "

 

[Asclepias]

I always thought Hannibal would have been like an olive or something. From the sculptures I have seen from ancient carthage and surrounding areas, they looked neither "black" nor "white".
I think its pretty much just a useless pissing match anyways. No one knows for sure.

Those coins that Asclepias provided make a compelling argument that Hannibal was a negro. Look at the exaggerated lips. What other Black would have coins made for them?

Not really...
View attachment 77889
View attachment 77891
If you take a look here he cherry picked one coin....
coins with Hannibal Barca image - Google Search

Thats been debunked at least 3 times on this very thread. Thats the god Merqal. Try again and this time not with something thats already been debunked.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I always thought Hannibal would have been like an olive or something. From the sculptures I have seen from ancient carthage and surrounding areas, they looked neither "black" nor "white".
I think its pretty much just a useless pissing match anyways. No one knows for sure.

Those coins that Asclepias provided make a compelling argument that Hannibal was a negro. Look at the exaggerated lips. What other Black would have coins made for them?

Not really...
View attachment 77889
View attachment 77891
If you take a look here he cherry picked one coin....
coins with Hannibal Barca image - Google Search

Thats been debunked at least 3 times on this very thread. Thats the god Merqal. Try again and this time not with something thats already been debunked.

Whats been debunked? That you obviously cherry picked the one coin that shows some black dude on it out of the dozen or so that dont?