Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
The hacker was from the Ukraine he was not he Ukraine. The e-mails were put up for bid, Obama was offered the sale for $500,000, he refused to deal with a terrorist. So the answer to your question is money, the Ukrainian hacker sold this info to the highest bidders for money. Are you saying that this is not real? Because the FBI has all of this in possession. Hillary Clinton's 'hacked' Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
You think she is still qualified to be president?She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
An FBI A-Team, 17 DOJ Judges are hardly several Republican candidates, in fact these are all non partisan, furthermore the contents of the e-mails that were retrieved from the Ukraine has not been revealed as of yet, so your saying that all is well is pure nonsense. Now if you want to argue with the Washington Post of Watergate fame, be my guest, because you are in LA LA land Hacked e-mails indicate that Hillary Clinton used a domain registered the day of her Senate hearings
When the Pentagon gets hacked, a Navy Seal team can be sent to investigate, with explosives. When Hilary Clintons network was hacked, no one knew, except for the hackers. If it were me, I would stick with the Seal team, but Hilly just can't understand how the government works.
Next
,
You think she is still qualified to be president?She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
In IT Security speak, it is all about the forensics, not the evidence. You people are somewhere caught between a state of Hope and Denial......not a good mindset for IT Security.
Anything top secret was given to her in hard copy when she was in her secure gvt office, and if being discussed among several in mail form, it was done only on a secure IN HOUSE mail system and not sent on the net or through .gov email system.She used her private email account to receive classified information. Which is a felony. To bad that part goes over your head. She should've used a secure government email for that.Yeah we could run on the average united states citizen. Is more important than Hillary as secretary of state Clinton, because ordinary people's email gets hacked everyday. But Hillary's couldn't. Lol, yeah she is the smartest y'all have.You Liberals are in such a state of denial when it comes to the security posture of the Clintoon private email server. Your partisanship is blinding any common sense whatsoever. Any of you Liberals on this thread have an IT Security background or do you think that by simply putting the private email server and storage in the hands of a Colorado outhouse is going to escape the eyes of the motivated hackers who want to get their hands on Clinton's email? Perhaps you are in denial that they the hackers left Clinton alone once they realized it was a private personal server? God help us if you loons are ever in charge of It Security. Your Security policy will be Hope of No Change.
---
"IT Security" is an oxymoron.
Snowden's NSA leaks and the Chinese hacks on the OPM Classified records demonstrate that.
We also know that Russia's cyber hacking abilities are very sophisticated.
The cons are simply trying to make Hillary's emails an election issue for their ignorant voter base.
.
---
Looks like my post went over your head. ALL email across the Internet domains can be hacked. Get it?
Some systems are more secure than others (top secret) and I'll bet Hillary knows that.
Compared to the Repub baffoons running for POTUS, doesn't Hillary have a lot more experience in the Executive Branch?
.
---
Too bad you cannot support your partisan allegations.
Here is PolitiFact's recent assessment:
Our conclusion
We’ve noticed several Republican candidates claiming that Clinton negligently handled classified information. But they’re jumping the gun. There isn’t enough evidence to prove that. Some evidence suggests Clinton and her team went to some trouble to keep classified information out the email system.
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
.
she didn't use an email service of anyone's, so exactly how could she have been hacked or anything sent to the Ukraine...?According to the neocon right, the Ukraine is our friend. What's the problem?
lolol
this op, in this thread, says that a Company that hillary used as secretary of state for her email was hacked back in 2010?, and because this company was hacked, the hillary's email sent while secretary of state was hacked and sent to the ukraine.All of you Left loons are all of the sudden IT security experts when it comes to Clintoon's email server. Ok, since you hit shits are so secure in your thinking that nothing was compromised, tell us what you know about the following when it comes to the server;
- was it single factor or two factor authentication?
- when the data was in transit, was the transmission 256 AES? Was the storage 256 AES encrypted?
- was the hardware running the server FIPS 140-2 certified?
- were the software protections Common Criteria certified? If so, what level?
- how many security audits were done annually? If so who did it and what was the criteria?
- what/ who were the vendors that provided firewall, IPS, VPN, Content Filter, application control, zero day malware protection?
- did she POP and SMTP communications to her email server from her mobile device? What where the protections used on the device?
The only thing worse than losing sensitive information is some grub publishing itThe hacker was from the Ukraine he was not he Ukraine. The e-mails were put up for bid, Obama was offered the sale for $500,000, he refused to deal with a terrorist. So the answer to your question is money, the Ukrainian hacker sold this info to the highest bidders for money. Are you saying that this is not real? Because the FBI has all of this in possession. Hillary Clinton's 'hacked' Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE
So you believe everything she says?as said before. TOP SECRET INFO was handled IN HOUSE and in house only, with NO emails on .gov over the internet for anyone with info in hand, nor on her server.... it was sent via hard copy to her, or via a completely separate IN HOUSE ONLY, TOP SECRET inter office mail system that the gvt has specifically for top secret info....that does not go out in to the cyber world.
