It seems that the only reason for Yovanovitch's testimony was to give an opportunity to smear Trump.I just want us playing by the same set of rules.I agree. They would not. And they are not.No reasonable prosecutor would go after someone on hearsay evidence.No editing, sticking to facts. Using your logic Trump committed crimes and got away with it because he is president.You are editing history.
She was found to have committed crimes, but was allowed the "I didn't mean it" defense. Would that work for anyone else?
No reasonble prosecute would prosecute but that doesn't satisfy the blood thirst.
And I can name a lot of "lesser" people who went to jail for doing less with classified info.
and we are not.
Here is how I see the rules are "different".
Today, we have social media smearing, slamming, lying and influencing.
Today we have such extreme partisanship dividing us we can not acknowledge that wrong is wrong, and by that, today - I mean Trump.
Did you listen to Maria Yovanovitch's testimony? How did we get to the point where smear campaigns and trolls and conspiracy theories determine our foreign policy and how we treat people?
Trump canned her like Obama canned ambassadors of past administrations. No outcry
When asked if she had knowledge of bribery from Trump, her answer was no.
When asked if she had knowledge of Trump breaking the law, her answer was no.
“Do you have any information regarding the President of the United States accepting any bribes?” Republican Congressman Chris Stewart of Utah asked point blank.
“No,” Yovanovitch said.
“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?”
“No.”
Another Democratic Star Witness Admits Trump Committed No Crime
Democrats can stop and point fingers at Trump, but, as they do there is usually three fingers pointing back to them