Hillary Hacked - AGAIN !!!!

[SeniorChief_Polock]

This is becoming a weekly occurrence. What's in this batch. More on Bill's flights on "Pedophile Air?"

Hack Yields Clinton Campaign E-Mail, Records

 

[Valerie]

well, stop it! stop the hacking, chief!

 

[Valerie]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

 

[Votto]

This is becoming a weekly occurrence. What's in this batch. More on Bill's flights on "Pedophile Air?"

Hack Yields Clinton Campaign E-Mail, Records

Well Hillary is a hack, so.......

 

[Moonglow]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

 

[Votto]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

Hacking may be illegal but have they passed any no hacking zones?

I think that might be the problem.

 

[Moonglow]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

Hacking may be illegal but have they passed any no hacking zones?

I think that might be the problem.

You don't mind being data mined?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

 

[Votto]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

Why are they being briefed by Hillary with top secret information about the affairs of the US government then?

 

[Moonglow]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

They might be, just not in this nation..But I am glad to know that you think two wrongs make a right...Totally destroys your position on illegal activity..

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

They might be, just not in this nation..But I am glad to know that you think two wrongs make a right...Totally destroys your position on illegal activity..

Not really, it just shows that you think hackers from outside the country obtaining classified information from a presidential candidate is more important than said presidential candidate that let it happen. Totally destroys what little credibility you had to start with. If it wasn't for her incompetence, this wouldn't have even been a topic for discussion. People will always hack, there's no way to prevent them from doing so, what we can do is actually follow the laws that makes classified information more secure.

 

[dannyboys]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

or you lied ooops they do not have evidence of the supposed hackery of her server


Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Hillary thought her illegal server was in a 'safe server space'.
Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

Hacking may be illegal but have they passed any no hacking zones?

I think that might be the problem.

 

[Moonglow]

Clinton’s private email server may have been penetrated by the Russians, though we don’t know that. But we do know that the official State Department nonclassified email system was indeed penetrated by the Russians, along with the White House unclassified email system.

The bottom line: If she had followed the rules and used her official email address, Vladimir Putin might actually have had a leg up on reading her correspondence.

So as we head toward the general election showdown, by all means denounce Hillary Clinton’s judgment and policy positions, but let’s focus on the real issues. She’s not a saint but a politician, and to me this notion that she’s fundamentally dishonest is a bogus narrative.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?_r=0

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

They might be, just not in this nation..But I am glad to know that you think two wrongs make a right...Totally destroys your position on illegal activity..

Not really, it just shows that you think hackers from outside the country obtaining classified information from a presidential candidate is more important than said presidential candidate that let it happen. Totally destroys what little credibility you had to start with. If it wasn't for her incompetence, this wouldn't have even been a topic for discussion. People will always hack, there's no way to prevent them from doing so, what we can do is actually follow the laws that makes classified information more secure.

I am not the one constantly bickering about what Hillary has done, nor the hackers..I do not support Hillary and wish she'd just go away...
But I also am tired of the double standard used by anti-Hillary people, just like the pro-Hillary. And yes, there is a way to stop hackers, it's called anti-hacking software, I guess Hillary doesn't want to splurge for it..

 

[Valerie]

her email was used without incident while she was SoS.

she followed the rules. she did not break any laws.

her email address was widely known and interacted with government servers daily for years.

desperate and dishonest hacks try to make political hay for months drip drip drip crooked hillary squawk like a parrot now!

the email factoid was revealed via another adventure of political hackery called the benghazi witch hunt.

rethuglicans have no shame as they continue to put party over country...


cuz hillary doesn't care about dead Americans including her FRIEND and colleague, the ambassador.

yeeah that's the ticket.

just STFU benghaaaaziii eeeeemail idjit hacks!!





GOP Benghazi Committee Chairman Gowdy Admits Investigation Was a Waste of Time

GOP Benghazi Committee Chairman Gowdy Admits Investigation Was a Waste of Time


House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Funny, you're trying to make it seem like using her private email was a good thing, but what about breaking several laws in the midst of failing to forward, hiding, and destroying those emails during an FBI investigation into her? Also the fact that the person running her server had to shut it down because... it was being hacked.

Why are you not saying anything about the illegal activity of the hackers also? Is one crime less noticeable to a foreigner?

The hackers aren't running for president.

They might be, just not in this nation..But I am glad to know that you think two wrongs make a right...Totally destroys your position on illegal activity..

Not really, it just shows that you think hackers from outside the country obtaining classified information from a presidential candidate is more important than said presidential candidate that let it happen. Totally destroys what little credibility you had to start with. If it wasn't for her incompetence, this wouldn't have even been a topic for discussion. People will always hack, there's no way to prevent them from doing so, what we can do is actually follow the laws that makes classified information more secure.

I am not the one constantly bickering about what Hillary has done, nor the hackers..I do not support Hillary and wish she'd just go away...
But I also am tired of the double standard used by anti-Hillary people, just like the pro-Hillary. And yes, there is a way to stop hackers, it's called anti-hacking software, I guess Hillary doesn't want to splurge for it..

I meant there's no way to stop hackers from hacking as in, they'll always be hacking someone. I was pointing out Hillary could have helped it, and chose not to. There's no double standard here. She's a career criminal, and is being investigated by the FBI for something she clearly did.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

her email was used without incident while she was SoS.

she followed the rules. she did not break any laws.

her email address was widely known and interacted with government servers daily for years.

desperate and dishonest hacks try to make political hay for months drip drip drip crooked hillary squawk like a parrot now!

the email factoid was revealed via another adventure of political hackery called the benghazi witch hunt.

rethuglicans have no shame as they continue to put party over country...


cuz hillary doesn't care about dead Americans including her FRIEND and colleague, the ambassador.

yeeah that's the ticket.

just STFU benghaaaaziii eeeeemail idjit hacks!!





GOP Benghazi Committee Chairman Gowdy Admits Investigation Was a Waste of Time

GOP Benghazi Committee Chairman Gowdy Admits Investigation Was a Waste of Time


House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0

It didn't follow the law, she was supposed to forward her emails because they're all treated as files, and she wasn't supposed to destroy or hide them, as they're all Federal Records.