- Thread starter
- #461
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
She was elected because her husband had been Pres, that's it. The Democrat machine got behind her because they wanted her in that position to help them. When she was there what the hell did she do? C'mon mr. fluffer, there's lots of Senators out there. What the hell did she do in 12 years? Name the bills she co-authored. Name the committee's she sat on and the influential decisions she helped craft. C'mon. Show us something other than her despotism derived jobs.
OK.
In 2001-2002, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 656 pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 656, 161 were directly sponsored by her:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
In 2003-2004, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 826 pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 826, 138 were directly sponsored by her:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
So, during George W. Bush 43's first term in office, Clinton was part of 1,482 pieces of legislation, 297 of which were directly sponsored by her.
In 2005-2006, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 895 pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 895, 175 were directly sponsored by her:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
In 2007-2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 991 pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 991, 235 were directly sponsored by her:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
And in 2009. the last 19 days of the Bush 43 congress, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 19, 2 were directly sponsored by her, even after the election of Barack Obama (D-IL) as our 44th POTUS and shortly before his inauguration:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
GRAND TOTAL, for Hillary Clinton's 8 years as Senator from the great state of New York, she sponsored or co-sponsored 3,387 (THREE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED and EIGHTY SEVEN) pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
Of those 3,387 pieces of legislation, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton directly sponsored (meaning, she was the initiator) 711 (SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVEN) pieces of legislation:
Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress
711 / 3,387 = 20.99% (21%) of all all of the legislation that had her name on it had her name as the main-sponsor.
Committee Assignments:
United States Senate career of Hillary Rodham Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Clinton served on five Senate committees with nine subcommittee assignments:
She was also a Commissioner of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe[4] (2001-2009).[5]
- Committee on the Budget (2001-2003)[1]
- Committee on Armed Services (2003-2009)[2]
- Committee on Environment and Public Works (2001-2009)[1]
- Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (2001-2009)[1]
- Special Committee on Aging.[3]
She also held two leadership positions in the Senate Democratic Caucus:
- Chairwoman of Steering and Outreach Committee (2003–2006)[6][7]
- Vice Chairwoman of Committee Outreach (2007–2009)[8]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can click at the links to see EXACTLY what the legislation was. There was a ton of it.
Hillary Clinton was quite a workhorse in the US- Senate. Even her Republican colleagues were forced to admit this. She was also one of the most-in-attendance Senators in the US Senate during those 8 years and when she was not there, until the 2008 primaries, was in her home state of New York, bringing the issues to the residents of her state, which is what a Senator is supposed to do.
That is her record. People who think that she did nothing of consequence in the US Senate are total blithering idiots. They, like Westwall, are the fuckwads who are going to be completely rolled over by Steamroller Clinton in 2016.
And, just for shits and grins:
Let's compare her work record to Jim DeMint, who was also elected to two terms (did not completely serve out his second term) from 2005-2013:
Jim DeMint Congress.gov Library of Congress
His TOTAL legislation over 7.5 years: 2,032 total pieces of legislation that he sponsored or co-sponsored. Of that 2,032, Jim DeMint directly sponsored 753 piece of legislation. He directly sponsored slightly more legislation than Clinton, but his overall work record was decidedly less. Plus, she did this on top of running for President in 2008.
Any Republican out there know EXACTLY what Jim DeMint sponsored, by name?
Chuckle, chuckle.
Thank you. After 36 pages somebody finally posted something up we can look at. But seriously. That's it? 12 years and that's it? I see a lot of sponsoring of other peoples work. I don't see much of what SHE did.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.
I'm sure you meant to say "would've" which is "would have" not "would of" - and it should be "run" not "ran" - where did you learn your English?Obama was a one term senator of Illinois who wouldn't have even won that if mike Ditka would of ran against him.that year (which he was thinking to do)
Lincoln was a one term senator also and obozo has more degrees than him , but other then that there is no comparison between the two, Obama is a fucking moron politically
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
What the fuck is this shit?
Ihe only qualifications you need to be president is 45 years old and a U.S. Citizen
35 years old, not 45.
It's in a document called the US Constitution.
A law degree is a qualification to be president? Since when? First lady of Arkansas? Being a candidate for president makes you qualified to be president?and she did absolutely nothing as Secretary of state, or in the SenateThe US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:
Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).
Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:
-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.
The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:
George H. W. Bush (41).
Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
"between her ear".
Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.
What the fuck is this shit?
Ihe only qualifications you need to be president is 45 years old and a U.S. Citizen
35 years old, not 45.
It's in a document called the US Constitution.
And, he doesn't know the English language, either........
A law degree is a qualification to be president? Since when? First lady of Arkansas? Being a candidate for president makes you qualified to be president?and she did absolutely nothing as Secretary of state, or in the SenateThe US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:
Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).
Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:
-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.
The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:
George H. W. Bush (41).
Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.
You are obviously totally ignorant of the fact of how many of our Presidents had law degrees.
Conservative ignorance = redundant term.
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
"between her ear".
Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
"between her ear".
Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.
There was nothing about that retarded posting of yours that was important.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.
She can lie real good.
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
"between her ear".
Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.
There was nothing about that retarded posting of yours that was important.
Not to someone that thinks having a vagina is a qualification.
Two assholes.Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.
Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.