Hillary Clinton: Qualifications to be President

She was elected because her husband had been Pres, that's it. The Democrat machine got behind her because they wanted her in that position to help them. When she was there what the hell did she do? C'mon mr. fluffer, there's lots of Senators out there. What the hell did she do in 12 years? Name the bills she co-authored. Name the committee's she sat on and the influential decisions she helped craft. C'mon. Show us something other than her despotism derived jobs.

OK.

In 2001-2002, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 656 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 656, 161 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


In 2003-2004, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 826 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


Of those 826, 138 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

So, during George W. Bush 43's first term in office, Clinton was part of 1,482 pieces of legislation, 297 of which were directly sponsored by her.

In 2005-2006, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 895 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 895, 175 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

In 2007-2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 991 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 991, 235 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

And in 2009. the last 19 days of the Bush 43 congress, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 19, 2 were directly sponsored by her, even after the election of Barack Obama (D-IL) as our 44th POTUS and shortly before his inauguration:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


GRAND TOTAL, for Hillary Clinton's 8 years as Senator from the great state of New York, she sponsored or co-sponsored 3,387 (THREE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED and EIGHTY SEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 3,387 pieces of legislation, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton directly sponsored (meaning, she was the initiator) 711 (SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

711 / 3,387 = 20.99% (21%) of all all of the legislation that had her name on it had her name as the main-sponsor.


Committee Assignments:

United States Senate career of Hillary Rodham Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Clinton served on five Senate committees with nine subcommittee assignments:

She was also a Commissioner of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe[4] (2001-2009).[5]

She also held two leadership positions in the Senate Democratic Caucus:

  1. Chairwoman of Steering and Outreach Committee (2003–2006)[6][7]
  2. Vice Chairwoman of Committee Outreach (2007–2009)[8]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can click at the links to see EXACTLY what the legislation was. There was a ton of it.

Hillary Clinton was quite a workhorse in the US- Senate. Even her Republican colleagues were forced to admit this. She was also one of the most-in-attendance Senators in the US Senate during those 8 years and when she was not there, until the 2008 primaries, was in her home state of New York, bringing the issues to the residents of her state, which is what a Senator is supposed to do.


That is her record. People who think that she did nothing of consequence in the US Senate are total blithering idiots. They, like Westwall, are the fuckwads who are going to be completely rolled over by Steamroller Clinton in 2016.


And, just for shits and grins:

Let's compare her work record to Jim DeMint, who was also elected to two terms (did not completely serve out his second term) from 2005-2013:

Jim DeMint Congress.gov Library of Congress

His TOTAL legislation over 7.5 years: 2,032 total pieces of legislation that he sponsored or co-sponsored. Of that 2,032, Jim DeMint directly sponsored 753 piece of legislation. He directly sponsored slightly more legislation than Clinton, but his overall work record was decidedly less. Plus, she did this on top of running for President in 2008.

Any Republican out there know EXACTLY what Jim DeMint sponsored, by name?

Chuckle, chuckle.
 
The US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:

Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).


Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:

-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.

The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:

George H. W. Bush (41).


Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.

:D
 
if she decides to run, and the people go to the polls and vote, they'll decide if she's qualified to be POTUS, not the morons on this board.

RW's are trending getting their ass whopped' by the Dems ... again.
 
Of course being First Lady is an accomplishment, especially one given the access that Hillary was. She met with world leaders, cabinet members, congressional leaders and dealt with the POTUS on a day to day basis.

Does any Republican have knowledge of the day to day workings of the White House?

Just that gives her more qualifications than any current Republican






How is being a door mat an accomplishment? Do you even know what the word means?

Hillarys exposure to Washington and global politics during her time as First Lady exceeds any current Republican.

You are welcome to try to prove otherwise

The White House cleaning staff has the same exposure

Silliness. No, it does not.






You're correct. Many of the cleaning staff are far better qualified than Hillary. Thank you for making the so clear.


Well, feel free to show us their resumes. You have gone from being silly to being just plain old idiotic in this matter.
 
She was elected because her husband had been Pres, that's it. The Democrat machine got behind her because they wanted her in that position to help them. When she was there what the hell did she do? C'mon mr. fluffer, there's lots of Senators out there. What the hell did she do in 12 years? Name the bills she co-authored. Name the committee's she sat on and the influential decisions she helped craft. C'mon. Show us something other than her despotism derived jobs.

OK.

In 2001-2002, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 656 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 656, 161 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


In 2003-2004, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 826 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


Of those 826, 138 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

So, during George W. Bush 43's first term in office, Clinton was part of 1,482 pieces of legislation, 297 of which were directly sponsored by her.

In 2005-2006, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 895 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 895, 175 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

In 2007-2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 991 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 991, 235 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

And in 2009. the last 19 days of the Bush 43 congress, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 19, 2 were directly sponsored by her, even after the election of Barack Obama (D-IL) as our 44th POTUS and shortly before his inauguration:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


GRAND TOTAL, for Hillary Clinton's 8 years as Senator from the great state of New York, she sponsored or co-sponsored 3,387 (THREE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED and EIGHTY SEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 3,387 pieces of legislation, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton directly sponsored (meaning, she was the initiator) 711 (SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

711 / 3,387 = 20.99% (21%) of all all of the legislation that had her name on it had her name as the main-sponsor.


Committee Assignments:

United States Senate career of Hillary Rodham Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Clinton served on five Senate committees with nine subcommittee assignments:

She was also a Commissioner of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe[4] (2001-2009).[5]

She also held two leadership positions in the Senate Democratic Caucus:

  1. Chairwoman of Steering and Outreach Committee (2003–2006)[6][7]
  2. Vice Chairwoman of Committee Outreach (2007–2009)[8]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can click at the links to see EXACTLY what the legislation was. There was a ton of it.

Hillary Clinton was quite a workhorse in the US- Senate. Even her Republican colleagues were forced to admit this. She was also one of the most-in-attendance Senators in the US Senate during those 8 years and when she was not there, until the 2008 primaries, was in her home state of New York, bringing the issues to the residents of her state, which is what a Senator is supposed to do.


That is her record. People who think that she did nothing of consequence in the US Senate are total blithering idiots. They, like Westwall, are the fuckwads who are going to be completely rolled over by Steamroller Clinton in 2016.


And, just for shits and grins:

Let's compare her work record to Jim DeMint, who was also elected to two terms (did not completely serve out his second term) from 2005-2013:

Jim DeMint Congress.gov Library of Congress

His TOTAL legislation over 7.5 years: 2,032 total pieces of legislation that he sponsored or co-sponsored. Of that 2,032, Jim DeMint directly sponsored 753 piece of legislation. He directly sponsored slightly more legislation than Clinton, but his overall work record was decidedly less. Plus, she did this on top of running for President in 2008.

Any Republican out there know EXACTLY what Jim DeMint sponsored, by name?

Chuckle, chuckle.





Thank you. After 36 pages somebody finally posted something up we can look at. But seriously. That's it? 12 years and that's it? I see a lot of sponsoring of other peoples work. I don't see much of what SHE did.
 
RWNJ onslaught in 5.... 4..... 3.... 2..... 1......

They're still pondering Palin - who attended 5 colleges in 6 years to get a 4-year degree in sports journalism. I'm not sure how they'll handle the Glen Rice affair.


Well, we really don't even know if she ever graduated. Right-wing was so obsessed with Obama posting his grades, yet they never questioned her about posting her diploma. She first claimed she had gotten a degree in something that the school wasn't even teaching at the time she would have graduated, so then she changed her tune and said her degree was in something else, which makes it doubtful that she even graduated....if she runs, she knows that it will be disclosed, even by her own party competitors...the Rice affair won't even come up after that.......imagine a President with no college degree!:eek:
 
Since when is electability a qualification? That's just stupid.

It has always been the primary qualification


In fact, in spite of the fact that Hillary will not win quite the landslide of a Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, LBJ or FDR, she will probably be the first president-elect to have gotten the most electoral bang for the buck since William McKinley. Those who know their electoral history know what I mean. I don't expect Rrrrraging Rrrrrrighties to grasp this. Rrrrrighties, go back to your Tonka toys. Thanks.
 
The US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:

Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).


Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:

-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.

The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:

George H. W. Bush (41).


Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.

:D
A law degree is a qualification to be president? Since when? First lady of Arkansas? Being a candidate for president makes you qualified to be president?:wtf:and she did absolutely nothing as Secretary of state, or in the Senate
 
The US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:

Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).


Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:

-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.

The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:

George H. W. Bush (41).


Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.

:D

A law degree makes you qualfied?

Being married to the governor or President is a qualification?

Why didn't she run in Arkansas for Senate? Isn't that her home State?

A political appointment hardly makes one qualfied.
 

Forum List

Back
Top