Hillary Clinton: Qualifications to be President

She was elected because her husband had been Pres, that's it. The Democrat machine got behind her because they wanted her in that position to help them. When she was there what the hell did she do? C'mon mr. fluffer, there's lots of Senators out there. What the hell did she do in 12 years? Name the bills she co-authored. Name the committee's she sat on and the influential decisions she helped craft. C'mon. Show us something other than her despotism derived jobs.

OK.

In 2001-2002, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 656 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 656, 161 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


In 2003-2004, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 826 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


Of those 826, 138 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

So, during George W. Bush 43's first term in office, Clinton was part of 1,482 pieces of legislation, 297 of which were directly sponsored by her.

In 2005-2006, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 895 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 895, 175 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

In 2007-2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 991 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 991, 235 were directly sponsored by her:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

And in 2009. the last 19 days of the Bush 43 congress, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) sponsored or co-sponsored 19 pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 19, 2 were directly sponsored by her, even after the election of Barack Obama (D-IL) as our 44th POTUS and shortly before his inauguration:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress


GRAND TOTAL, for Hillary Clinton's 8 years as Senator from the great state of New York, she sponsored or co-sponsored 3,387 (THREE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED and EIGHTY SEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

Of those 3,387 pieces of legislation, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton directly sponsored (meaning, she was the initiator) 711 (SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVEN) pieces of legislation:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Congress.gov Library of Congress

711 / 3,387 = 20.99% (21%) of all all of the legislation that had her name on it had her name as the main-sponsor.


Committee Assignments:

United States Senate career of Hillary Rodham Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Clinton served on five Senate committees with nine subcommittee assignments:

She was also a Commissioner of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe[4] (2001-2009).[5]

She also held two leadership positions in the Senate Democratic Caucus:

  1. Chairwoman of Steering and Outreach Committee (2003–2006)[6][7]
  2. Vice Chairwoman of Committee Outreach (2007–2009)[8]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can click at the links to see EXACTLY what the legislation was. There was a ton of it.

Hillary Clinton was quite a workhorse in the US- Senate. Even her Republican colleagues were forced to admit this. She was also one of the most-in-attendance Senators in the US Senate during those 8 years and when she was not there, until the 2008 primaries, was in her home state of New York, bringing the issues to the residents of her state, which is what a Senator is supposed to do.


That is her record. People who think that she did nothing of consequence in the US Senate are total blithering idiots. They, like Westwall, are the fuckwads who are going to be completely rolled over by Steamroller Clinton in 2016.


And, just for shits and grins:

Let's compare her work record to Jim DeMint, who was also elected to two terms (did not completely serve out his second term) from 2005-2013:

Jim DeMint Congress.gov Library of Congress

His TOTAL legislation over 7.5 years: 2,032 total pieces of legislation that he sponsored or co-sponsored. Of that 2,032, Jim DeMint directly sponsored 753 piece of legislation. He directly sponsored slightly more legislation than Clinton, but his overall work record was decidedly less. Plus, she did this on top of running for President in 2008.

Any Republican out there know EXACTLY what Jim DeMint sponsored, by name?

Chuckle, chuckle.





Thank you. After 36 pages somebody finally posted something up we can look at. But seriously. That's it? 12 years and that's it? I see a lot of sponsoring of other peoples work. I don't see much of what SHE did.



Well, that was stupid of you. Shows how little you know about the legislative branch. She personally sponsored 711 pieces of legislation and HELPED to WORK ON the others, making a massive total of +3,300 pieces of legislation. So, no, she didn't just sponsor other peoples' work. Good Lord, are you REALLY that daft? Plus, she is one of the only freshmen Senators ever to get some of those choice committee assignments, it is no small deal.

We have not even started on her tenure as Secretary of State, but that will be harder, since most of her acclaim will come out in 100 years or so when secret files will be opened. Who knows what kind of catastrophes she averted as SOS, burt I am sure she put out a number of political and military forest fires. She was unbelievably loved and respected there, FAR MORE than Colin Powell (whom I liked) and Condoleeza Rice (whom I also liked).

Hillary Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next POTUS. No Republican can even get close to her.
 
Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Two assholes.

Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.


Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.
 
Obama was a one term senator of Illinois who wouldn't have even won that if mike Ditka would of ran against him.that year (which he was thinking to do)
I'm sure you meant to say "would've" which is "would have" not "would of" - and it should be "run" not "ran" - where did you learn your English?

Lincoln was a one term senator also and obozo has more degrees than him , but other then that there is no comparison between the two, Obama is a fucking moron politically



Actually, Obama served two years as a US Senator.....and 6 as a State Senator....after teaching law....so the moron is you, who can't even speak the language. I suppose you are one of those that insists that we speak only English here in America, maybe you should learn it.
 
Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Two assholes.

Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.


Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.

BTW, I believe she has "two" ears.
 
The US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:

Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).


Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:

-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.

The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:

George H. W. Bush (41).


Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.

:D
A law degree is a qualification to be president? Since when? First lady of Arkansas? Being a candidate for president makes you qualified to be president?:wtf:and she did absolutely nothing as Secretary of state, or in the Senate


You are obviously totally ignorant of the fact of how many of our Presidents had law degrees.

Conservative ignorance = redundant term.
 
The US Constitution says that the eligibility requirements for the presidency are:

Natural born US citizen.
Age of 35 (or above).


Hillary Rodham Clinton is EMINENTLY qualified to be the next President of the USA:

-Law degree
-First Lady of the State of Arkansas
-First Lady of the USA
-Senator from New York
-first serious female candidate for President (2008)
-Secretary of State.

The only candidate in the last FOURTY years to have a resume deeper than hers was:

George H. W. Bush (41).


Rrrrraging Rrrrrighties, beware what you ask for, you just may get it. The more you bitch about what you think is her lack of qualifications, the more they will be thrown into your faces.

:D
A law degree is a qualification to be president? Since when? First lady of Arkansas? Being a candidate for president makes you qualified to be president?:wtf:and she did absolutely nothing as Secretary of state, or in the Senate


You are obviously totally ignorant of the fact of how many of our Presidents had law degrees.

Conservative ignorance = redundant term.

I am very aware that many did. Having one and that being a qualification aren't the same thing.
 
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.


"between her ear".


Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.


:rofl:
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.


There was nothing about that retarded posting of yours that was important.
 
Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Two assholes.

Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.


Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.

A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.
 
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.


"between her ear".


Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.


:rofl:
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.


There was nothing about that retarded posting of yours that was important.

Not to someone that thinks having a vagina is a qualification.
 
Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Two assholes.

Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.


Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.

A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.

Another one that focuses on the missing "s" rather than the point of the post. Who know, maybe you think if you vote for her she'll give you a piece.
 
She can lie real good.

If she is such a bad candidate, I'm sure your party will have no problem coming up with any number of candidates who could easily beat her. Who do you think those candidates might be, and if any of them survive the crazies of the nominating process, what makes you think they would then be acceptable to sane people?
 
Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.


"between her ear".


Let's see if he gets the fuck-up.


:rofl:
So you focus on leaving off an "s" while ignoring the important part of the post. Typical.


There was nothing about that retarded posting of yours that was important.

Not to someone that thinks having a vagina is a qualification.


Hint: the only morons who are referring to Hillary Clinton's genitals are Rrrrrrraging Rrrrrighties.
 
Hillary and Bill: Two for the price of one!
Two assholes.

Apparently you're ignoring their approval ratings - both during and after they left office.


Just another ignorant Conservative who has absolutely no idea what kind of steamroller is coming at the GOP in 2016. Ignorance is bliss. Let's let him just stay blissful.

Just another retarded Liberal that will vote for her because of what's between her legs rather than what's between her ear. By the way, the latter isn't very much.

A whole lot more than what's behind your ear! (Most of us have two ears, so does Hillary, but I gather you only have one). And, Libs aren't the ones calling women candidates "the Babe" like conservatives.....so just because all you are interested in is a pretty face for a leader, doesn't mean everyone else is.

Which party is engaging in the "war on women"? Hint: it ain't Democrats/Liberals - it's deranged NaziCons!
 

Forum List

Back
Top