Hillary Clinton: How Bergdahl disappeared 'doesn't matter'

Seems the consensus is that we should have abandoned an American prisoner to the enemy on suspicion alone. More proof conservatives despise due process.
Perhaps YOU can explain how dealing with a terror group and giving them 5 people back doesn't endanger more US troops and citizens? Perhaps you can explain why a deserter was worth the trade but none of the Americans captured and murdered by ISIS were?
Certainly, Pub dupe. Taliban is an enemy in a war- he was a POW. ISIS is a terrorist group, grabbing civilians for money, .
The Taliban are terrorists you retard.
Not according to US and Afghan gov'ts or the UN, brainwashed, our way or the highway, functional moron. Unlike Al-Qaeda, ISIS, etc etc, they haven't gone after civilians outside Afghanistan, and WERE the Afghan gov't before 2003...
Taliban went after civilian CHILDREN in a Pakistani school just recently, killed over 100.

So stick that up you ass.
 
Sorry bout that,


1. He joined the other side its plain to see, and any fucking idiot should be able to see that.
2. His comrades the muslims traded him for some of their own, and he was useful to them, and if he gets free here in America he will do something.
3. This guys a traitor for sure, and they know it.
4. The government already has evidence he wasn't a captured solider he joined up with them.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
To the looney Left, the only treason is not blindly accepting every thought and action of Obama.
 
I don't think we should elect her to office.

why the fuck do some people say "WE", i personally despise that fucking commie bitch.., if you have one CC of patriotic blood in your heart, you will stop saying "WE" and say "THEM" or "THEY", better yet, say those "LIBERSCUM" :up: .... :lmao:
 
Seems the consensus is that we should have abandoned an American prisoner to the enemy on suspicion alone. More proof conservatives despise due process.
Perhaps YOU can explain how dealing with a terror group and giving them 5 people back doesn't endanger more US troops and citizens? Perhaps you can explain why a deserter was worth the trade but none of the Americans captured and murdered by ISIS were?
Certainly, Pub dupe. Taliban is an enemy in a war- he was a POW. ISIS is a terrorist group, grabbing civilians for money, .
POWs are service men who get CAPTURED.

Servicemen who desert and try to enlist with the enemy are TRAITORS.

It's not yet been proven he deserted.
 
Seems the consensus is that we should have abandoned an American prisoner to the enemy on suspicion alone. More proof conservatives despise due process.

This is just RWnut derangement. If Hillary or Obama were Republicans they'd be falling all over themselves defending the way the Bergdahl matter has been handled.
 
Seems the consensus is that we should have abandoned an American prisoner to the enemy on suspicion alone. More proof conservatives despise due process.
Perhaps YOU can explain how dealing with a terror group and giving them 5 people back doesn't endanger more US troops and citizens? Perhaps you can explain why a deserter was worth the trade but none of the Americans captured and murdered by ISIS were?
Certainly, Pub dupe. Taliban is an enemy in a war- he was a POW. ISIS is a terrorist group, grabbing civilians for money, .
POWs are service men who get CAPTURED.

Servicemen who desert and try to enlist with the enemy are TRAITORS.

It's not yet been proven he deserted.
But Zimmerman and Darren Wilson are guilty, amirite, asswipe?
 
This is as bad as national security adviser Susan E. Rice, who said last summer that Sergeant Bergdahl had served “with honor and distinction”.

Hillary Clinton How Bergdahl disappeared doesn t matter WashingtonExaminer.com

march 25 2015
In a comment that now seems akin to her "what difference does it make" dismissal of the Benghazi, Libya, terror slayings of U.S. officials, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that how U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl ended up in Taliban hands "doesn't matter."

Clinton was interviewed last June after President Obama traded five Taliban prisoners for Bergdahl, who on Wednesday was charged with desertion.

Obama was criticized by many after the trade, with some suspecting that Bergdahl sympathized with the Taliban.

But in the interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer, Clinton defended Obama in comments that she may have to answer for on the campaign trail.

"If you look at what the factors were going into the decision, of course there are competing interests and values. And one of our values is we bring everybody home off the battlefield the best we can. It doesn't matter how they ended up in a prisoner of war situation," said Clinton.

It doesn't matter?" Sawyer asked.

"It doesn't matter," Clinton said. "We bring our people home."
Bullshit.

State Dept. defends arrest of Marine Veteran being held in Mexico on gun charge The Right Scoop -

US Marine Held in Mexico Prison for Guns The Case of Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi - Latin America news - Boston.com
 
Seems the consensus is that we should have abandoned an American prisoner to the enemy on suspicion alone. More proof conservatives despise due process.

So the terrorists we freed to get the traitor isn't even part of your equation. That's sick frankly
 
...a hundred thousand of them over there, five more is a drop of water in the ocean.

Another Taliban Enabler...

stolen from the post below yours :lmao:

How many people will the five people kill? Maybe we can tell their families that. Lots of people are killed over here by terrorists, your kid "is a drop of water in the ocean." I'm sure that will be reassuring to them
 
It was a terrible deal. Most of us knew it at the time. I have serious doubts about obama's real motives on this and the bad deal he is trying to make with Iran.

Impeach the bastard before he does more damage.
 
This is as bad as national security adviser Susan E. Rice, who said last summer that Sergeant Bergdahl had served “with honor and distinction”.

Hillary Clinton How Bergdahl disappeared doesn t matter WashingtonExaminer.com

march 25 2015
In a comment that now seems akin to her "what difference does it make" dismissal of the Benghazi, Libya, terror slayings of U.S. officials, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that how U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl ended up in Taliban hands "doesn't matter."

Clinton was interviewed last June after President Obama traded five Taliban prisoners for Bergdahl, who on Wednesday was charged with desertion.

Obama was criticized by many after the trade, with some suspecting that Bergdahl sympathized with the Taliban.

But in the interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer, Clinton defended Obama in comments that she may have to answer for on the campaign trail.

"If you look at what the factors were going into the decision, of course there are competing interests and values. And one of our values is we bring everybody home off the battlefield the best we can. It doesn't matter how they ended up in a prisoner of war situation," said Clinton.

It doesn't matter?" Sawyer asked.

"It doesn't matter," Clinton said. "We bring our people home."

He's still not guilty of desertion, at this moment.
Your support of a traitor is noted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top