Hillary claims the Bible is her "biggest influence"

[occupied]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

With that kind of defense it needs no enemies.

 

[jknowgood]

She's full of shit. Again.

Her biggest influence was Saul Alinsky's "Rule for Radicals.

The Hillary Letters Washington Free Beacon

Does she not realize what her party thinks of people influenced by the Bible? Calls them "clingers".

That's your version of the Bible, the one that hates faggots, not her version, which follows the teachings of that rarely mentioned fellow named Jesus.

Your girl is influenced by it, you call people like her weak minded. Lol

Christianity is for fools, slaves, and children, but we don't elect the irreligious in this country, and she is just another pol, who can have my vote, since it hardly matters, if she makes it that far.

Your supporting a Christian, your political beliefs are weakening your ability to think?

 

[Valerie]

She's full of shit. Again.

Her biggest influence was Saul Alinsky's "Rule for Radicals.

The Hillary Letters Washington Free Beacon

“Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?”

Hillary is a piece of sh*t.

her thesis was a fundamental disagreement with his methods...




The senior thesis of Hillary D. Rodham, Wellesley College class of 1969, has been speculated about, spun, analyzed, debated, criticized and defended. But rarely has it been read, because for the eight years of Bill Clinton’s presidency it was locked away.

As forbidden fruit, the writings of a 21-year-old college senior, examining the tactics of radical community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, have gained mythic status among her critics...



The confident young student took her thesis title — “There Is Only the Fight...” — from T.S. Eliot:

"There is only the fight to recover what has been lost and found and lost again and again."





In formal academic language, Rodham offered a “perspective” or muted critique on Alinsky's methods, sometimes leaving unclear whether she was quoting his critics or stating her own opinion. She cited scholars who claimed that Alinsky's small gains actually delayed attainment of bigger goals for the poor and minorities.

...


Her options after graduation were attending law school at Harvard or Yale, traveling to India on a Fulbright scholarship, or taking the job with Alinsky's new training institute, which would have allowed her to live in Park Ridge with her parents, Hugh and Dorothy Rodham, and commute into Chicago.

“His offer of a place in the new institute was tempting,” she wrote in the end notes to the thesis, “but after spending a year trying to make sense out of his inconsistency, I need three years of legal rigor.” She enrolled at Yale that fall, a year ahead of a charming Rhodes Scholar from Arkansas.

“I agreed with some of Alinsky's ideas,” she explained in “Living History,” her 2003 biography, “particularly the value of empowering people to help themselves. But we had a fundamental disagreement. He believed you could change the system only from the outside. I didn't.”


...


Can a college research paper really be the Rosetta Stone to deciphering a candidate's politics or character?

“It's a moronic statement,” said Hillary Rodham's thesis adviser, Alan Schechter, now an emeritus professor at Wellesley, as well as a friend and campaign contributor to Sen. Clinton.

“The notion that a 21-year-old idealist somehow remains a 21-year-old idealist their whole life — she's not a radical at all. I think she's very mainstream. She's a pragmatist. She's a much more thoughtful, cautious, careful, pragmatic person...


Reading Hillary Clinton s hidden thesis - politics - Decision 08 - Hillary Clinton News NBC News

 

[occupied]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

With that kind of defense it needs no enemies.

People who have their religion and politics all mixed together are terribly easy to be led away from the path of righteousness.

 

[jknowgood]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

 

[Moonglow]

"Her own made Liberal up version of reality you mean."

Liberals will defend The Vagina to the bitter end won't they?

I wouldn't vote for her, but you are in position to judge her religion anymore than she does yours...
There is also no religious test for the office, which makes this a moot subject anyhow...

Its not a religious test. Its an honesty test, or more specifically, a hypocrisy test.

She fails both rather miserably.

.

There is no way to judge someone religion...since many on this forum claim religion yet act worse than the ones that claim they don't...

 

[Moonglow]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

So with the hate I have seen you extol, you are a non-believer..

 

[Stephanie]

Well the Democrat voters don't seem to mind their politicians lie to them. look at Obama's made up life. He was a poor black child who just stumbled into his white grandparents riches.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Yes, there's no "Religious Test" but there IS a "Truthfulness Test".

 

[jknowgood]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

With that kind of defense it needs no enemies.

People who have their religion and politics all mixed together are terribly easy to be led away from the path of righteousness.

Won't argue there.

 

[jknowgood]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

So with the hate I have seen you extol, you are a non-believer..

Hate? No hate sometimes the truth just hurts.

 

[occupied]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

The only difference between social conservatives and the Westboro baptist church is a matter of degree.

 

[JoeMoma]

 

[kiwiman127]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

Right. And that explains all the angry threads and posts directed at Pope Francis when he uses the Bible and it's passages as he addresses the poor, inequality, racism and pollution. Screams of "communist/socialist" directed at the Pope are quite common from the far right.
That's defending the Bible?

 

[Mad Scientist]

"I proudly declare my Christianity!"
"Where do you worship at?"
"Er.. um... the Washington D.C. Mosque! Yeah!"
"That's for practitioners of Islam."
"Well I meant, uh... the D.C. Synagogue!"
"That's where Jews go"

Liberals only know "Love thy Neighbor" and a miss understanding of Romans 13. They don't know sh*t else.

See, questioning people about their Religion isn't a "Religious Test", it's merely finding out if they're full of sh*t or not. Liberals always resist any form of questioning.

 

[jknowgood]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

The only difference between social conservatives and the Westboro baptist church is a matter of degree.

Oh bull, the baker was friends with the queers. So why did the queers want her to cater their wedding knowing about her beliefs? So they could force her to go against her beliefs. The queers are the haters.

 

[Moonglow]

Republicans think they own exclusive rights to the bible.

No, but we are the ones that defend it.

You defile it when you use it to get votes for hypocrites who love war and hate people.

Don't love war, but sometimes you need to do it. Christianity doesn't teach hate. It's the non believers that do the hating.

So with the hate I have seen you extol, you are a non-believer..

Hate? No hate sometimes the truth just hurts.

So you hate no one, why your not even biased..

 

[Wildman]

“I still find it a source of wisdom, comfort and encouragement,”

the reality of this tale is she really is reading the Koran and does not know the difference...., or she knows she is reading the Koran and calls it her "Bible"

what a fucking lying liberslut she has been ALL her life.

she deserves my ultimate salute....., bitch

 

[Stephanie]

The left hates Christians until one of their own Claims they are one and loves them their bible. All we need now is how she clings to guns